Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is HAProxy?

Featured HAProxy reviews

HAProxy mindshare

As of December 2025, the mindshare of HAProxy in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category stands at 10.4%, down from 12.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
HAProxy10.4%
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)15.4%
NetScaler13.8%
Other60.4%
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

PeerResearch reports based on HAProxy reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Delivery Controllers (ADC)Dec 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonHAProxy vs NetScalerDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonHAProxy vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)Dec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonHAProxy vs Microsoft Azure Application GatewayDec 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Imperva Application Security Platform4.3N/A95%133 interviewsAdd to research
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway3.77.2%79%49 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Dec 7, 2025

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business278
Midsize Enterprise187
Large Enterprise496
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
University
7%
Government
6%
Educational Organization
5%
Healthcare Company
4%
Insurance Company
3%
Retailer
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Transportation Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Non Profit
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Construction Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%

Compare HAProxy with alternative products

Learn more about HAProxy

HAProxy customers

Related questions

 
HAProxy Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Head of DevOps at TripFactory5.0I've used HAProxy for over a decade to efficiently manage web traffic, and it's excelled in performance, scalability, and reliability. Its simplicity, logging features, and reverse proxy capabilities have significantly improved our infrastructure over previous Apache setups.
Principal Engineer Manager at a manufacturing company with 501-1,000 employees4.0I used HAProxy primarily as a Kubernetes ingress controller for scalable, cost-effective routing and WAF needs, but configuration management, UI, and support could improve to better support multi-environment setups and API gateway functionality.
Junior System Administrator & DevOps at a tech services company with 11-50 employees4.5I've found HAProxy to be a stable, high-performing load balancer with strong SSL and health check capabilities, though its complex setup and limited built-in cloud integration could be improved for easier onboarding and better cloud-native support.
Co-Founder, CEO at a tech services company with 1-10 employees5.0I use HAProxy as a scalable and efficient load balancer for our high-traffic e-commerce platform, and it reliably handles concurrency with minimal latency. Its open-source version saved us significant time, money, and staffing with minimal maintenance.
DevOps engineer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees4.0I've used HAProxy for a year to manage internal traffic across a Proxmox HA cluster, appreciating its simple setup, clear configuration, and stable performance, though I'd like a GUI and better alerting for backend failures.
Co-Founder at tenekit4.0I use HAProxy primarily for quick, small load-balancing tasks, appreciating its simplicity and speed. It's straightforward to configure, integrates well with Docker, and efficiently manages basic tasks, though enhanced documentation with diverse scenarios would improve its usability.
Manager server admin and security at Vivaconnect3.5In my company, I use HAProxy for TCP streams, specifically handling SMTP, SMPP, and POP3 services. While effective for traffic forwarding, it lacks robust logging and monitoring. HAProxy is cost-effective compared to high-end alternatives like DNS Made Easy.
Manager - IT Infrastructure and Network at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5I use HAProxy for load balancing and find it effective but challenging to implement and troubleshoot. The dashboards and reports need improvement to compete better with F5, HAProxy's main competitor in the market.