Google App Engine Reviews

Enterprise users find Google App Engine's pricing competitive at low usage tiers, but costs can escalate with increased usage or inadequate management. While some rate pricing as affordable, others find it expensive compared to alternatives, especially under the standard environment. The pay-as-you-go model offers free tiers for F1 usage, while F2 and F4 tiers are billed based on memory and CPU. Licensing is typically a yearly cost, with potential financial impact from currency fluctuations.

• "If we don't know how to work with the tool, we might have some spikes in price."
• "We pay the license yearly. It's about $6 a month, which is $72 a year per person, so it's about $500."
• "I would like to have more free application with it. Some of the applications, I am paying more for them. I think that they must be free."

Organizations primarily use Google App Engine for software development, business purposes, migrating to the cloud, and learning. They deploy web applications, utilize serverless solutions, and implement front-end rendering with platforms like React and Next.js. Users apply it for industrial maintenance, communication, collaboration, and documentation. They leverage autoscaling benefits, log monitoring with Stackdriver, and integration with other Google services. Many deploy APIs using Flask and Firestore, engaging it for wide-ranging applications, including CRM systems and procurement tools.

Customer service and support for Google App Engine vary widely among users. Some report responsive and effective assistance, while others encounter challenges with attention to detail or speed. Several users note good experiences with third-party support or find the documentation helpful. Others face delays and unawareness from support agents. Ratings for technical assistance fluctuate from satisfactory to poor, with some relying on Stack Overflow for additional help.

Users mostly found Google App Engine's initial setup straightforward and efficient, with some completing it in under an hour. Several found it easy due to good documentation, while others appreciated its simplicity in deploying web applications. However, some faced challenges with complex applications and an awkward IDE plugin requirement, which created a learning curve. Collaborative efforts often expedited the setup process, and many valued the seamless integration with Google's cloud services.

Many users find Google App Engine scalable. Configurations and scaling costs require little concern. Users appreciate its ability to handle traffic automatically in the standard environment, though some find deployment times longer in flexible instances. Integration with third-party applications has been smooth. Users have reported mostly smooth experiences without significant difficulties. There is an allowance for more storage, and users occasionally meet minor issues but think improvements could still be made.

Google App Engine exhibits high reliability, with users reporting minimal disruptions and quick resolution of issues. Many rate its dependability highly, though some note occasional slowness with large scripts and longer deployment times in flexible instances. Over years of usage, users have experienced only a few disruptions, suggesting strong consistency. While performance with expansive codebases is slightly less robust, overall feedback suggests a stable environment fit for various applications.