Google App Engine vs Virtuozzo Application Platform comparison

Google and Virtuozzo are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Google is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4, while Virtuozzo is ranked #21. Google holds a 2.4% mindshare in PSP, compared to Virtuozzo’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Virtuozzo users who would recommend it.

Google App Engine

Read 36 Google App Engine reviews

1,646 Views
1,498 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Read 7 Virtuozzo Application Platform reviews

688 Views
571 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google App Engine

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Google App Engine and Virtuozzo Application Platform compete in cloud application hosting. Virtuozzo has the upper hand thanks to its feature set and value for advanced deployment scenarios, while Google App Engine excels in support quality, making it ideal for businesses prioritizing assistance.

Features: Google App Engine offers automatic scaling, easy integration with IDEs, and seamless scalability for web applications. Virtuozzo Application Platform supports container orchestration, provides a multi-cloud environment, and grants granular resource management. Google App Engine focuses on ease of use for developers, while Virtuozzo handles complex deployments with robust resource control.

Room for Improvement: Google App Engine can be restrictive in customization and lacks flexibility for equivalent service use. Its pricing predictability may not match advanced scenarios, and it could improve detailed operational controls. Virtuozzo can benefit from simplifying its setup requirements, enhancing real-time resource adjustment, and refining user interface elements for better user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google App Engine eases deployment with automated scaling but limits customization options. It offers comprehensive customer support for integration. Virtuozzo requires more setup knowledge but provides flexible configuration for tailored solutions, along with efficient technical support for detailed guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Google App Engine presents a predictable pay-as-you-go model, making ROI calculation straightforward based on usage. Virtuozzo, with its complex pricing for advanced features, offers higher ROI for multi-cloud implementations. Businesses seeking budget-friendly solutions may prefer Google, while those seeking comprehensive features might find Virtuozzo worthwhile.

To learn more, read our detailed Google App Engine vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google App Engine vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google App Engine

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

21st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Google App Engine is 2.4%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Virtuozzo Application Platform is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Google App Engine	2.4%
Virtuozzo Application Platform	1.2%
Other	96.4%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Rajesh Kadyan

Senior Engineer at Brillio

Have managed resources seamlessly thanks to robust platform capabilities

The areas of Google App Engine that I would to improve or enhance include its allowance for complete end-to-end deployment and scalability; however, it is manageable only for a few languages. For instance, it doesn't support languages C and C++, only basic support for Node.js, Java, and Ruby. It's not a comprehensive solution for all scenarios. Moreover, the security feature is based on IAM roles, but it should ideally be based on Active Directory (AD) roles. For IAM-based roles, we need to add the proper users and provide all security permissions manually. In an AD-based model, we would simply add users to a specific group, and all permissions would be inherited.

Read full review

Miguel Maloney Thompson

IC Director at a printing company with 11-50 employees

A scalable and stable solution that has good scalability and is easy to setup

It is a scalable solution. I have yet to have a scenario regarding automatic scale and if there's an increase in resource requirement or need. We have yet to have that scenario. We have yet to test that. The scalability was more than manually adjusting and increasing whatever I had to do. I rate it eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Google App Engine is highly scalable and can integrate easily with other applications."

"Google App Engine's most valuable feature is self-management. You do not have to manage the infrastructure underneath where all the functions are happening, such as load balancing deployment and version management, they are managed by the system itself."

"I've found that all of the features are valuable, especially the shared drive and the ability for multiple people to use their documents at the same time."

"The most valuable features of Google App Engine include the ease of rolling back deployments when failures occur, the ability to track deployment times, and the feature to split traffic between different instances."

"What I appreciate most about Google App Engine is that the deployment is significantly easier compared to a conventional Linux platform."

"Its ability to integrate with most devices helps users who have different or old devices."

"What I appreciate most about Google App Engine is that the deployment is significantly easier compared to a conventional Linux platform."

"Administering App Engine is simple; it has intuitive UIs and a very scalable app engine."

More Google App Engine pros

"The control is valuable. It's really easy to use and you have good control of your solutions."

"Technical support from Jelastic is very good."

"The solution is scalable, and that is what we are looking at. There is no learning curve as we have not done much research."

"The advanced level of production-ready Docker hosting, one-click application deployment, and the truly flexible pricing."

"The dynamic vertical scaling is a unique feature."

Cons

"There is limited customization because the sandbox environment restricts it."

"The documentation and community are lacking for this product."

"Currently, we have to use Google CLI and utilize Google App CLI SDKs for deployment. If options were available to enable these SDKs for Terraform and CloudFormation, it would be more helpful for executing one-click deployments."

"Google Cloud support for Google App Engine is very poor, with unresponsive and unaware agents. It took them almost a month to inform me that SSH is not possible with private instances."

"The only concern is that there is a number of the offerings which are built on their own proprietary technologies. With some of the offerings in Google Cloud, it's difficult to have a path to migrate to other cloud providers."

"I would like a simpler deployment tool on laptops. It is a bit complicated at the moment. We know how to do it, but it could be easier to deploy it on laptops."

"Difficult to assess how pricing is managed."

"The main drawback with Google App Engine's standard environment was its restrictions. We could not work with file systems, run shell scripts from the environment, or use WebSockets."

More Google App Engine cons

"Lacks better integration into enterprise storage products."

"For now, some customers are requesting support of Docker containers for Windows."

"The backup functionality needs to be improved."

"The security layers also need to be improved because there is no clear layer or tier of security in the solution."

"The backup features need improvement, or rather it should be added, as I could not find it."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would like to have more free application with it. Some of the applications, I am paying more for them. I think that they must be free."

"If we don't know how to work with the tool, we might have some spikes in price."

"We pay the license yearly. It's about $6 a month, which is $72 a year per person, so it's about $500."

"I would rate the cost 3 out of 5. There are additional costs other than licensing fees."

"Pricing for providers is revenue-shared based. Providers should invest in hardware to set up the Jelastic cluster."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

University

10%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google App Engine?

The product's setup and deployment phases are easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google App Engine?

I believe it is reasonably priced. I've never heard anyone express that the licenses are too expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google App Engine?

The error logging system in Google App Engine could be enhanced. While there are troubleshooting documents with Google-defined error logs, identifying the exact root cause can be challenging. Often...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure vs Google App Engine

Compared 21% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Google App Engine

Compared 18% of the time

Heroku vs Google App Engine

Compared 13% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Google App Engine

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon Lightsail vs Google App Engine

Compared 6% of the time

More Google App Engine Competitors

Red Hat OpenShift vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 20% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 14% of the time

Heroku vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 14% of the time

Engine Yard Cloud vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 10% of the time

More Virtuozzo Application Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google App Engine

January 2026

Download Google App Engine product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

January 2026

Download Virtuozzo Application Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Jelastic

Overview

Google App Engine is a Platform-as-a-Service (Paas) provider that equips web application developers with all the resources and tools that they need to develop, test, and run their applications on Google's infrastructure. Everything is built into the kit, so with one download of the SDK, you'll be well on your way to first-rate apps.

Google

Your Platform as a Service solution for DevOps hosting!

An elastic, high performance PaaS solution for cloud and hosting providers. The easy way to sell cloud hosting to DevOps-focused SaaS companies.

Turnkey application hosting for DevOps.

Sell PaaS alongside your existing products. The Virtuozzo Application Platform runs on the infrastructure you have today – even virtualized in your cloud or hosting platform.

It makes DevOps hosting fast, easy and cost-effective – and with true consumption-based billing, it gives you a real competitive advantage over hyperscale clouds.

Platform as a Service opens up new markets for your business: you can sell hosting to any company that depends on DevOps for internal or customer-facing IT.

Virtuozzo

Sample Customers

Khan Academy, Best Buy, Gigya, MetOffice, Getaround, Mimiboard, NewsLimited, WebFilings, and CloudLock.

Hosting Providers: Hidora, Elastx, eApps, SaveInCloud, Infomaniak, Layershift, Valtti, Dogado, Locaweb, Planeetta, dogado, ServInt, Hostnet, Info.nl, Innofield, Lunacloud, Reg.ru, Websolute Private Cloud and Integrators: Joe's Datacenter, Croc, Ciklum, Vergence, Centerprise, GMV Soluciones

Buyer's Guide

Google App Engine vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

December 2025

Free Report: Google App Engine vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Google App Engine vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google App Engine vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.