Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is a secure web gateway (SWG) tool that provides multiple forms of protection against malware, including blocking categories of websites, inline scanning of downloaded files, and zero trust-based advanced threat protection. The solution monitors and controls any interaction with any website, including blocking access to websites based on category and risk score, blocking download of malware, blocking upload of sensitive data to personal file sharing accounts, and detecting shadow IT.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway | 4.6% |
| Cisco Umbrella | 16.7% |
| Zscaler Internet Access | 14.5% |
| Other | 64.2% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Secure Web Gateways (SWG) | Aug 28, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Aug 28, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs Cisco Umbrella | Aug 28, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs Fortinet FortiGate SWG | Aug 28, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks | Aug 28, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco Umbrella | 4.4 | 16.7% | 97% | 121 interviewsAdd to research |
| Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks | 4.2 | 10.8% | 92% | 64 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 25 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 130 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 84 |
| Large Enterprise | 260 |
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway Features
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are that it has strong reporting capabilities, good URL filtering, and can retrieve and analyze lost data when necessary.
Shipra G., Service Delivery Manager at Paramount Computer Systems, says, “The reporting part of it is pretty awesome. With the reporting, you can drill down effectively. It gives us a lot of power to really look into what we are looking for. That is one very crucial feature. In the remote filtering part, the agent that they have on Forcepoint is pretty light. That also is a very, very good feature that we look into and sell.”
Mohammed S., Security Engineer at Futuretec, writes, "The most valuable feature for me in Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is URL filtering, though all other features of the product are okay as well."
Arvind K., Director at Foresight Software Solutions Pvt Ltd., says, “They have well-integrated web security. They have the enterprise DLP included in the cloud as well.”
An Ict Help Desk Administrator Individual Contributor at a transportation company states, “The most valuable feature of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is the ability to retrieve and analyze lost data. It also allows us to detect and prevent the release of all messages and to take appropriate actions in consequence.”
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway was previously known as Forcepoint SWG, Websense Web Security, Forcepoint TRITON.
Adventist Health, Alphawest, Amadori, Anoka County, Compartamos Banco, Davies Turner, EverBank, iGATE, Karlstad Municipality, Lake Michigan Credit Union, Scavolini, Smurfit Kappa, Toyota
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Works | 3.5 | I use Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway mainly for DLP and content filtering. Its robust on-premises solution is valuable, but improvements like SaaS offerings and enhanced CASB are needed. Competitors include Netskope and Zscaler, with better cloud support. |
| Network and Security Engineer at a government with 201-500 employees | 4.5 | I use Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway to block unnecessary sites like social media to enhance productivity. It ensures smooth traffic flow, unlike Bluecoat or Symantec, which caused network issues. However, the dashboard needs improvement for better user usage insights. |
| Vice President Cloud Security Architect at Reliance Industries Ltd | 4.5 | We utilize Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway for malware protection and content filtering, valuing its content and URL filtering features. Although it requires improvements in scalability and occasionally faces performance issues, we chose it for our available skill set after evaluating Zscaler and Palo Alto. |
| Director of cyber security at GlobalLogic | 2.5 | In my company, I use Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway to address proxy-related slowness. However, it lacks detailed generative AI category updates, necessitating improvements due to potential security risks. I've also evaluated Netskope and Zscaler as alternatives. |
| Director Market Growth and Development at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 4.5 | I use Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway for secure traffic redirection and appreciate its easy configuration and policy customization. While similar to McAfee in functionality, Forcepoint plans to enhance offerings with a cloud-based platform for integrated security solutions. |
| Manager, Strategic Alliances at Softcell Technologies Limited | 4.0 | We used Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway for scalable, secure internet access without hardware limitations. It delivered good speed and data loss prevention. However, the reporting needs improvement for complete visibility. Despite this, the ROI is strong, reducing hardware and staffing needs. |
| Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees | 3.5 | I’ve found Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway effective for web filtering and data protection, though it’s pricey and lacks multi-tenancy. It’s stable, integrates well with other Forcepoint tools, and meets most functionality needs despite room for enterprise-level improvements. |
| Lead Integration Architect at DXC Technology | 4.5 | No summary available |
