

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway and Check Point Harmony SASE are competing in the secure web gateway category. Forcepoint appears to have the upper hand with its detailed content filtering and monitoring capabilities, while Check Point offers a more integrated cloud solution.
Features: Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is distinguished by extensive URL filtering, policy customization, and seamless integration with other security solutions. It provides robust categorization capabilities and simplifies policy setup. Check Point Harmony SASE features user-centric design and advanced threat prevention, including Zero Trust Network Access and Citrix SD-WAN integration, enhancing secure remote access.
Room for Improvement: For Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway, users point out areas of improvement including AD authentication, reporting, and policy enforcement delays. The deployment process is perceived as complex, often requiring support intervention. Check Point Harmony SASE could improve integration capabilities, SIEM support, and management of policies and logs. Users also desire more user-friendly alerts and faster client setup.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway primarily offers an on-premises solution with hybrid cloud capabilities, though technical support quality varies, and customer service needs improvement. Check Point Harmony SASE supports deployment across private, public, and hybrid clouds, receiving generally positive feedback for technical support, yet suggesting the need for faster customer service response times.
Pricing and ROI: Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is seen as expensive but competitive, needing significant investment to balance user-based licensing and additional features. Check Point Harmony SASE, positioned at a higher price point, justifies its cost through robust security features and integration capabilities. Both solutions promise good returns with their cloud-based architecture reducing hardware needs, but Check Point’s licensing threshold may not suit users with fewer licenses.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) blocked access to those URLs at the network level before users could click through.
We are saving 40% of our time, which is good.
I would rate support 10 out of 10.
People working really hard, listening to every issue and request, and replying within hours.
There are instances where both the response time and technical support quality need improvement.
The cloud-native model ensures we are not tied to any specific location or hardware, which has been a great game changer in terms of agility.
I would rate it nine out of ten for scalability.
Check Point Harmony SASE's scalability is good; it can handle growth easily, allowing me to easily add another region and gateway to have more people join in.
There are some lags and glitches with connectivity, so I would rate the stability as between seven or eight out of ten.
After the last improvement, I can say it is much more stable now.
Check Point Harmony SASE is stable most of the time, but there are still some issues that are hard to troubleshoot.
A local data center in Turkey would enhance the product, as currently, our Internet traffic goes to another country, which is problematic for us.
One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers.
The product is lacking features that other competitors have, making it quite challenging to migrate customers to this solution because it feels very much unfinished.
They need to enhance their CASB solutions since currently, the cloud index support is low compared to competitors.
The setup process is complex.
Cost efficiency is a consideration, as SASE products are not the cheapest security products.
The cost is a bit expensive for most users.
It is a bit expensive.
It's really expensive.
The firewall management is the most valuable feature for me.
The Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) feature is a major highlight as it gives users seamless and secure access to internal resources without requiring a full-blown VPN, which improves both security and user experience.
The Zero Trust and segmentation have helped my team and our customers significantly because we are able to protect every scope and allow the work-from-home users to access internal resources while passing through a threat prevention gateway, ensuring that everything is safe.
As organizations move away from legacy applications and data centers, the SASE architecture and ZTNA-based operations become essential.
If you have the complete Forcepoint solution, it can integrate with other Forcepoint products, such as DLP solution and email gateway.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) | 4.5% |
| Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway | 2.8% |
| Other | 92.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 53 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers robust security features like split tunneling, MFA, and Zero Trust Network Access focused on secure remote access and optimized connectivity for remote teams.
Check Point Harmony SASE delivers advanced security through a user-friendly interface, efficient VPN connections, and a centralized management console. It enhances security with real-time threat intelligence from ThreatCloud and traffic management via built-in optimization. Firewall as a Service and Secure Web Gateway safeguard against unauthorized access and phishing. While users seek enhanced networking customizations and better integration with identity providers, there's an emphasis on improving reporting, real-time analytics, and policy management. Requests also include a Chrome extension, traffic balancing, and simplified configuration to address some resource-intensive aspects.
What are the key features of Check Point Harmony SASE?
How can organizations benefit from using Check Point Harmony SASE?
Check Point Harmony SASE is used across industries for secure remote access and connectivity, protecting sensitive data, and managing access to corporate resources. It is ideal for those with hybrid cloud models and requires comprehensive security measures combined with existing IT infrastructures to meet specific industry demands.
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway ensures secure internet access with features like URL filtering and real-time analytics. It's known for robust security, scalability, and integration capabilities, making it ideal for managing web traffic and preventing data loss.
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is designed to provide comprehensive protection for web traffic while enabling organizations to maintain security and productivity. By integrating well with Forcepoint offerings like DLP and CASB, it offers added functionality. The gateway equips users with tools such as SSL inspection and Shadow IT visibility. Despite its complex setup and challenges with updates, the platform is recognized for its flexibility, performance reliability, and ability to deliver granular policy control. Customers in demanding environments benefit from its extensive IP-based protection and robust report customization capabilities.
What are the standout features?Government agencies and professional services deploy Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway in on-premises and hybrid cloud setups for enhanced web security. By monitoring and controlling user activity, these entities maintain productivity and protect sensitive data. The gateway effectively manages internal and external web traffic, ensuring cyber threats are minimized. Specific industry needs are addressed with robust security frameworks tailored to maintain data integrity and efficiency.
We monitor all Secure Web Gateways (SWG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.