We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway and Quad9 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Internet Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Most valuable features are content filtering and monitoring."
"The tool categorizes the user profiles which is very comfortable."
"Email Sandbox, DLP and Proxy."
"Provides good visibility and good filtering features."
"The feature that I find to be most valuable is the flexibility of the single endpoint."
"SWG allows me to track internet usage patterns, helping optimize bandwidth and understand how much time each employee spends online."
"The product's user management is an area where my company does not face any challenges."
"Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway does most of its job well, but I especially like its data security feature."
"The most valuable feature of Quad9 is that it is a free solution."
"Setting up Quad9 is straightforward if you know what you're doing, and it's easy to use overall."
"A room for improvement in Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is the support it offers. It's very bad. What I'd like to see in the next release of the product is for it to be less complicated because at the moment Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is more complicated than other products. Sometimes issues come up that you can't solve without the support team. For example, you should write the root password to fix the issue. In the next release of the product, it would be good if it had an easy-to-use interface. Troubleshooting issues in Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway should be less complicated as well."
"The initial setup can be complex."
"I have been in contact with technical support several times, and I am not happy with them."
"The initial setup was complex."
"A feature we wish to see addressed in the next release of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway involves its administration."
"Security of browsing."
"To access the root of the product for troubleshooting you must have a data engineer. This is the big issue with Forcepoint. The support community is not good."
"An area for improvement would be the classification of websites - it can take a long time for new websites to be classified."
"It used to work fine for all the devices, but it started to slow and become non-responsive. I would have to reload the page two or three times before all the pages loaded. With OpenDNS, I only need to load the page once."
"Quad9 could improve by having more free features, such as custom DNS filtering."
More Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is ranked 4th in Internet Security with 47 reviews while Quad9 is ranked 11th in Internet Security with 2 reviews. Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is rated 7.8, while Quad9 is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway writes "Simple to set up, reliable, and offers great reporting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quad9 writes "It's easy to use and set up, but I've faced performance problems ". Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco Umbrella, Symantec Proxy, Fortinet FortiProxy and Fortinet FortiGate SWG, whereas Quad9 is most compared with Cloudflare DNS, Google Cloud DNS, Cisco Umbrella, Verisign Public DNS and Neustar UltraDNS. See our Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs. Quad9 report.
See our list of best Internet Security vendors.
We monitor all Internet Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.