Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
CloudCheckr Logo

CloudCheckr Reviews

Vendor: Spot - A Flexera company
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

What is CloudCheckr?

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization. 
The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.
Get the CloudCheckr Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about CloudCheckr, Snyk, IBM Turbonomic and more!
CloudCheckr is the #5 ranked solution in top Managed Cloud Services solutions, #12 ranked solution in top Cloud Cost Management solutions, #24 ranked solution in top AI Observability solutions, and #31 ranked solution in top Cloud Management solutions. PeerSpot users give CloudCheckr an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. CloudCheckr is most commonly compared to Snyk: CloudCheckr vs Snyk. CloudCheckr is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 47% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 16% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
CloudCheckr
December 2025
Get the report
Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Featured CloudCheckr reviews

Read more reviews

CloudCheckr mindshare

Product category:
Cloud Management
As of December 2025, the mindshare of CloudCheckr in the Cloud Management category stands at 1.5%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
CloudCheckr1.5%
VMware Aria Automation8.3%
Morpheus6.2%
Other84.0%
Cloud Management

PeerResearch reports based on CloudCheckr reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryCloud ManagementDec 30, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 30, 2025Download
ComparisonCloudCheckr vs Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM)Dec 30, 2025Download
ComparisonCloudCheckr vs VMware Aria OperationsDec 30, 2025Download
ComparisonCloudCheckr vs VMware Aria AutomationDec 30, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Snyk4.11.8%100%50 interviewsAdd to research
IBM Turbonomic4.44.1%98%205 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Dec 14, 2025

Valuable Features

CloudCheckr provides notifications for cost-saving opportunities and optimization suggestions. It features easy management, customizable invoicing, and excellent technical support. Users appreciate its simplicity and effective integration with AWS, Azure, and GCP, providing complete cost visibility. Security insights are accessible with quick scans. The interface is intuitive, facilitating easy use and saving users time. Granular reporting and useful dashboards enhance cost and consumption analysis. Scalability and useful recommendations make it highly valuable for organizations.
  • "CloudCheckr has impacted my organization positively by making things easier and saving time, approximately three hours a week."
  • "The recommendation section is pretty helpful."
  • "The solution is scalable for our purposes."

Room for Improvement

CloudCheckr's cost model is confusing, causing issues with pricing clarity. Onboarding and self-healing features require smoother implementation. There are performance issues with data extraction and integration, especially with Azure and Google Cloud. Reporting and analytic capabilities are limited, lacking comprehensive security compliance data. The interface is complex, hindering usability, and there's no ability to schedule email reports. Many features remain unimplemented, and pricing structure needs improvement. Integration and performance need enhancements for large data management.
  • "The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."
  • "The solution must improve its user interface."
  • "CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."

Pricing

CloudCheckr pricing is generally viewed as reasonable, with costs tied to factors like Azure consumption and user type. Licensing fees, especially for CloudCheckr CMx High Security, can vary based on service provider arrangements and billing methods. Many users find the pricing fair compared to other options. Setup costs and licensing are positively received, reflecting a good value proposition for enterprise buyers evaluating cloud management solutions.
  • "The cost is on par with other providers."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced."
  • "A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

Popular Use Cases

Companies primarily utilize CloudCheckr for cloud optimization and financial management. They use it to maximize resource utilization and identify cost-saving opportunities. It provides insights into cloud security and compliance, assisting with monthly billing and cloud management across platforms like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Managed service providers leverage CloudCheckr for understanding billing and security, identifying vulnerabilities, and offering a comprehensive view of their clients' cloud operations. Additionally, it evaluates cloud consumption data, aiding decision-making.

Service and Support

Customer service and support of CloudCheckr receive positive feedback for their helpfulness, responsiveness, and knowledgeable assistance. Teams aligned with CloudCheckr find the support valuable during deployments, demos, and technical issues. Some users have resolved challenges through discussions with account representatives. Although there are instances where in-depth assistance was lacking, generally, the technical and customer support is deemed good and satisfactory by most users, especially when using the online portal for case submission.

Deployment

Users describe CloudCheckr's initial setup as straightforward and simple. It typically involves filling an onboarding form and can be completed in a couple of hours with deployment taking less than two hours. Teams emphasize its efficiency with quick deployment and ease in configuring Azure tenants. No significant issues or obstacles are mentioned. CloudCheckr operates as a SaaS tool, reading data from Azure without storing it.

Scalability

CloudCheckr scales effectively with thousands of users, handling diverse customer bases. Some users report issues with processing large data volumes, leading to system slowdown. However, many find it reliable without speed or functionality problems. Companies of varying sizes use it successfully, and its scalability receives high ratings. It is suitable for expanding usage across organizations, providing comprehensive management capabilities for partners and customers.

Stability

CloudCheckr stability is generally regarded as excellent, with many emphasizing its reliability and lack of bugs. Some users have encountered minor initial issues, but feedback is mostly positive regarding its performance in cloud and cost optimization, especially compared to Azure Cost Management. Users rate it highly, noting no downtime or usability issues, although some mention a need for better performance. CloudCheckr is seen as enterprise-grade and highly stable.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our CloudCheckr Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business42
Midsize Enterprise22
Large Enterprise57
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
University
6%
Government
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
Educational Organization
6%
Media Company
5%
Real Estate/Law Firm
4%
Legal Firm
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
4%
Insurance Company
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Library
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Transportation Company
1%

Compare CloudCheckr with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about CloudCheckr

CloudCheckr was previously known as CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP.

CloudCheckr customers

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Related questions

  • 27
When evaluating Cloud Management solutions, what aspects of it are the most important to look for?
  • 13
Scalr vs BMC CLM
  • 18
What is the difference between a multi-cloud vs hybrid cloud management platform?
  • 166
What are the advantages and disadvantages of on-premise solutions vs cloud-hosted environment?
  • 17
Which cloud IaaS/PaaS platform would you recommend learning to a newbie?
  • 17
What is Unified Cloud Security? Can you define the scope and use cases of the term?
  • 16
vCloud Director versus HP Operations Orchestration?
  • 23
What are Pros and Cons of Cloud-based Patch Management?
  • 14
How to host/use WhereScape RED on cloud?
  • 43
What are your recommended best practices and tools to prevent cloud jacking in your organization?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Cloud Management
Cloud Cost Management
Managed Cloud Services
AI Observability

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Snyk vs CloudCheckr Logo
Snyk vs CloudCheckr
IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr Logo
IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr
VMware Aria Operations vs CloudCheckr Logo
VMware Aria Operations vs CloudCheckr
Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) vs CloudCheckr Logo
Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) vs CloudCheckr
CloudStack vs CloudCheckr Logo
CloudStack vs CloudCheckr
Rapid7 InsightCloudSec vs CloudCheckr Logo
Rapid7 InsightCloudSec vs CloudCheckr
Cloudability vs CloudCheckr Logo
Cloudability vs CloudCheckr
Spot vs CloudCheckr Logo
Spot vs CloudCheckr
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs CloudCheckr Logo
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs CloudCheckr
Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs CloudCheckr Logo
Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs CloudCheckr
Azure Cost Management vs CloudCheckr Logo
Azure Cost Management vs CloudCheckr
CloudBolt vs CloudCheckr Logo
CloudBolt vs CloudCheckr
Apptio One vs CloudCheckr Logo
Apptio One vs CloudCheckr
AWS Trusted Advisor vs CloudCheckr Logo
AWS Trusted Advisor vs CloudCheckr
AWS Cost Explorer vs CloudCheckr Logo
AWS Cost Explorer vs CloudCheckr
See all alternatives
 
CloudCheckr Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Associate Director, ITSM & Onboarding at a computer software company with 201-500 employees3.0We primarily use CloudCheckr for analyzing Azure consumption for clients. While its dashboards and recommendations are helpful, the reporting and security compliance features are inadequate. We're considering CloudBolt for better reporting and support, as CloudCheckr is more focused on AWS.
Director, Trust Operations Analytics at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees5.0I've used CloudCheckr for two years to manage cloud services, and its intuitive interface saves me about three hours weekly. It's stable, scalable, and supported well, though I think pricing could be improved.
Enterprise Cloud Architect at Peritem Consultants Ltd5.0No summary available
Assistant Vice President, Sr. Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I used CloudCheckr on AWS to evaluate our spending and identify unnecessary costs. While it's scalable, I found it less useful than Tableau for data organization. Its user interface needs improvement to enhance usability and effectiveness.
Associate Director at Searce Inc5.0No summary available
Product/Solutions Sr. Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees4.0No summary available
Service Delivery Manager at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees3.5No summary available
Deputy Solution Specialist at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees3.0No summary available