Cisco Intersight vs CloudCheckr comparison

Cisco and Spot are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cisco is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.2, while Spot is ranked #30 with an average rating of 7.0. Cisco holds a 2.5% mindshare in CM, compared to Spot’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Spot users who would recommend it.

Cisco Intersight

Read 15 Cisco Intersight reviews

3,384 Views
1,049 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Read 8 CloudCheckr reviews

903 Views
424 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Cisco Intersight

CloudCheckr

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudCheckr and Cisco Intersight are competitive solutions focused on cloud resource management and monitoring. CloudCheckr is preferable for price-conscious buyers due to its cost management capabilities, while Cisco Intersight offers a superior choice for those prioritizing comprehensive infrastructure features.

Features: CloudCheckr offers cost optimization, financial management, and detailed usage analytics. Cisco Intersight provides IT operation features like device management, automation, and workload optimization.

Room for Improvement: CloudCheckr could enhance its integration options beyond major cloud platforms, improve interface usability, and expand its analytics depth. Cisco Intersight might benefit from simplifying its deployment process, offering more user training resources, and reducing complexity in its integrated infrastructure approach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudCheckr features a straightforward deployment with extensive support materials and seamless integration with public cloud platforms. Cisco Intersight caters to sophisticated IT environments with a more complex deployment but offers strong support for large-scale operations.

Pricing and ROI: CloudCheckr provides favorable pricing models with quick ROI through effective cost management. Cisco Intersight might have higher setup costs but delivers long-term ROI by offering comprehensive IT operations solutions for advanced infrastructure management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Intersight vs. CloudCheckr Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight vs. CloudCheckr

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Intersight

Ranking in Cloud Management

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (12th)

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Cloud Management

30th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Cost Management (10th), Managed Cloud Services (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cisco Intersight is 2.5%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudCheckr is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

ItzikLiberman

System Presale at Bezeq

Provides data center management and full infrastructure visibility

Cisco Intersight is a very effective tool for data center infrastructure management. It provides visibility into other products and storage, and is beneficial for environments where Cisco and other vendors coexist, allowing full visibility of the entire infrastructure. We have visibility to other products and storages, some networking. It is also valuable for its integration capabilities with other products.

Read full review

Peter Ramnath

Associate Director, ITSM & Onboarding at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides recommendations regarding how cost and consumption can be adjusted, but the reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited

We are not happy with the product’s reporting capabilities. We are planning to change the solution. The security compliance feature doesn’t give much data because CloudCheckr has done a majority of its development on AWS. The majority of our clients are on Microsoft Azure. There are a lot of features and information available for Amazon, but not for Azure. The tool wasn't meeting our expectations. The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited. There's no ability to do scheduled email reports. The report could only be sent to a single email address. The tool was not very usable. We had multiple clients and tasks to work with.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Our organization uses Cisco Intersight since it helps manage our physical infrastructure."

"The tool helps to manage Cisco servers."

"It offers visibility and optimization of workloads, which are very important features for a company."

"I rate it a ten out of ten. I don't have any issues with it."

"What I like most about Cisco Intersight is its manageability."

"Cisco Intersight is a very effective tool for data center infrastructure management."

"Scalable portfolio of services for remote device management, with good cloud integration. It's also easy to set up."

"We enjoy having an inside view of all the data centers and all the EdgeX nodes within a single portal rather than going into the EdgeX connections one by one."

More Cisco Intersight pros

"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The solution is mostly stable."

"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."

"The recommendation section is pretty helpful."

Cons

"The solution needs some enhancement in order to build the cluster in two nodes."

"I would like AI to be more integrated into Cisco Intersight."

"An area for improvement in Cisco Intersight is automation. It needs more automation capabilities. Apart from enhanced automation, I want Cisco Intersight to integrate with third-party monitoring tools in its next release."

"More products should be made compatible with iWORK, including more software and hardware."

"The usability must be better."

"There is a significant issue regarding migration from UCS Manager into Intersight without formatting the Fabric Interconnects (FI), which is problematic in a production environment."

"Technical support from Cisco has been mixed. For complex issues, it's challenging to get the right engineer quickly unless you have a specific contract like CX."

"When new features are added, the service becomes full of bugs."

More Cisco Intersight cons

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's just the standard licensing cost. There are no additional fees."

"Cisco Intersight has competitive pricing. On a scale of one to five, my rating for its pricing is four."

"Cisco Intersight is not cheap, but it's not the most expensive product either."

"You can get a free license for monitoring but need to purchase a license if you need extra control."

"The product is cost-effective."

"The cost is on par with other providers."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

31%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Intersight?

Intersight can validate our environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Intersight?

I would like AI to be more integrated into Cisco Intersight. It would be great to have a chat session mode AI so that when I am on standby and encountering issues, I could engage with it, much like...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Intersight?

We use Cisco Intersight ( /products/cisco-intersight-reviews ) for operational tasks. We run patches and import firmware updates from the Cisco site. In the event of a component failure, such as a ...

See all answers

What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?

The recommendation section is pretty helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

The price depends on the actual Azure consumption and what we feed into it. The cost is on par with other providers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco UCS Manager vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 40% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 8% of the time

Dell CloudIQ vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 8% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 7% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 5% of the time

More Cisco Intersight Competitors

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 19% of the time

Apptio One vs CloudCheckr

Compared 15% of the time

Cloudability vs CloudCheckr

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 13% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs CloudCheckr

Compared 11% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight

August 2025

Download Cisco Intersight product report

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr

August 2025

Download CloudCheckr product report

Also Known As

Intersight

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

Overview

Cisco Intersight is Cisco’s systems management platform that delivers intuitive computing through cloud-powered intelligence. This platform offers a more intelligent level of management that enables IT organizations to analyze, simplify, and automate their environments in ways that were not possible with prior generations of tools. This capability empowers organizations to achieve significant savings in Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and to deliver applications faster, so they can support new business initiates. The advantages of the model-based management of the Cisco UCS platform plus Cisco Intersight are extended to Cisco UCS servers and Cisco HyperFlex and Cisco HyperFlex Edge systems. Cisco HyperFlex Edge is optimized for remote sites, branch offices, and edge environments.

Cisco

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization.

The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

Spot

Sample Customers

EXMAR, RapidScale

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight vs. CloudCheckr

July 2025

Free Report: Cisco Intersight vs. CloudCheckr

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Intersight vs. CloudCheckr and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Intersight vs. CloudCheckr report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.