No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CloudCheckr vs Harness comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.9
CloudCheckr CMx High Security users saw a 25% cost reduction and improved operations with automated invoicing benefits.
Sentiment score
7.7
Harness deployment automation enhanced ROI by reducing overhead, cutting deployment times, and improving efficiency and incident management.
It has reduced manual efforts that would otherwise be spent checking where spending is occurring and ensuring all teams use resources correctly.
Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees
I have seen a return on investment of 100%, with significant cost avoidance and measurable savings within the first few months of deployment.
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
The biggest ROI comes from faster software delivery and improved engineering productivity.
ML Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees
By adopting templates and various different pipelines across our own IDP platform, we have saved upwards of 30 to 40% of development time.
Technical Associate at ZS
With Harness, the release process decreased from three or four hours to one or two hours, making deployments much quicker.
Software Engineer at Citi
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.5
Ingram's team experienced effective support overall but noted delays and inadequacies in handling complex technical issues.
Sentiment score
8.2
Harness documentation reduces support needs, with quick, helpful responses and prompt incident notifications enhancing customer satisfaction.
The additional support ended up taking longer than expected, with responses that did not meet our need for detailed and technical assistance.
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
Sometimes support needs to be reached, but they are very responsive and supportive.
Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees
The customer support for CloudCheckr is fantastic.
Director, Trust Operations Analytics at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
Senior AWS Consultant at Quantum Integrators
We have not faced any customer support issues, with tickets resolved in less than a four-day SLA.
Quality Engineering Lead at a logistics company with 51-200 employees
I have not required extensive customer support involvement, as the documentation is well-structured.
ML Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
CloudCheckr is highly scalable, efficiently managing multiple accounts and environments for enterprises, despite occasional performance issues with large data volumes.
Sentiment score
8.1
Harness is praised for its scalability, effectively handling complex workflows, high release frequency, and enterprise demands with minimal issues.
It scales well for MSPs and large enterprises, allowing for management of hundreds of accounts and tens of thousands of resources while retaining performance and visibility.
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
Our entire organization uses it with hundreds of applications, and it supports this scale effectively.
Senior Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
It is able to work on our infrastructure side, which is EKS, and we are able to handle our organization growth effectively for an enterprise use case.
Technical Associate at ZS
It handles increasing complexity in deployment pipelines and maintains high release frequency without any issues.
ML Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
CloudCheckr is highly rated for stability, with users noting reliable performance and minimal issues, making it a robust choice.
Sentiment score
7.9
Harness is generally stable for production, with occasional downtime, minor issues, and reduced stability when integrating over 20 applications.
Deployment pipelines, rollback systems, and performance reliability have been excellent even during high deployment activity.
ML Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees
Harness is completely stable, and we are using it in production without facing any stability issues at all.
Quality Engineering Lead at a logistics company with 51-200 employees
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
Senior AWS Consultant at Quantum Integrators
 

Room For Improvement

CloudCheckr requires better pricing clarity, onboarding, performance with large data sets, UI customization, security features, and third-party integrations.
Harness needs improved onboarding, UI, pricing for small companies, security, documentation, automation, stability, and analytics features.
CloudCheckr is a powerful and feature-rich tool with abundant metrics.
Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees
Another area is drift analysis; there have been complaints about tracking optimization opportunities, such as how to track opportunities identified in January and whether they were resolved in February.
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
An area where CloudCheckr can be improved is pricing.
Director, Trust Operations Analytics at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
There is not a lot of good support for pipeline as code, and I often find myself not using pipeline as code the way other platforms such as GitHub Actions or Jenkins integrate pipeline as code.
Technical Associate at ZS
Improved documentation and onboarding tutorials would help accelerate adoption.
Cloud Platform at Futurescape
One key area for improvement is simplifying the onboarding of new users; the reduction of platform complexity will help new users understand how all components interact, which feels initially very difficult.
ML Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees
 

Setup Cost

CloudCheckr pricing is competitive, usage-based, and offers good value, with enterprises and providers appreciating its cost-effectiveness.
Harness's pricing is seen as justified due to enterprise benefits and low setup costs, despite appearing higher initially.
Overall, the pricing was quite convenient and represented good value for money.
Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees
Pricing is feature-tiered under the MSP licensing, and I would say the pricing was quite competitive and fair.
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
From what I understand with respect to Harness, licensing and setup costs were relatively low for an enterprise, and the pricing was more catered toward enterprises who would invest in the technology.
Technical Associate at ZS
However, once Harness was fully integrated into our workflow, the operational benefits became clear, justifying the investment for our use case, despite the slightly higher cost for smaller teams.
ML Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees
 

Valuable Features

CloudCheckr offers cost-saving optimization, multi-cloud management, and financial alignment with ease of use for AWS, Azure, and GCP.
Harness provides AI-enhanced DevOps tools for streamlined deployments, faster troubleshooting, and integration with popular platforms like GitHub and Vault.
The cost visibility and reporting are really valuable, and the dashboard is informative and enables good decision-making.
Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees
What makes CloudCheckr easy for me to use is its intuitive interface.
Director, Trust Operations Analytics at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
The best features CloudCheckr offers include out-of-the-box security and compliance check features that provide over 35 different types of compliance checks at no cost, best practice checks, and alerts.
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
Harness uses AI to suggest errors in case of deployment failures.
Senior Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
The platform also supports cloud-native environments and Kubernetes deployments, making pipeline management easier, and its automation capabilities significantly improve speed and reliability.
Cloud Platform at Futurescape
The unified platform through Harness is extremely valuable because it has reduced our tool sprawl; instead of maintaining separate CI/CD, feature flagging, and verification tools, we can now manage everything effectively.
ML Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudCheckr
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
13th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Management (17th), Managed Cloud Services (6th), AI Observability (26th)
Harness
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
8th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Build Automation (7th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (13th), Feature Management (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of CloudCheckr is 2.9%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Harness is 2.2%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Cost Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Harness2.2%
CloudCheckr2.9%
Other94.9%
Cloud Cost Management
 

Featured Reviews

AbhishekGupta2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
Centralized cloud costs have boosted savings while reporting and user experience still need work
The best features CloudCheckr offers include out-of-the-box security and compliance check features that provide over 35 different types of compliance checks at no cost, best practice checks, and alerts. Another valuable feature is the multi-cloud overview, providing unified reporting across AWS and Azure while allowing us to create different types of dashboards based on who logs into the platform. Additionally, from an MSP standpoint, there is good ease of deployment, especially the billing and chargeback functionality for a reseller or managed services provider. CloudCheckr has positively impacted my organization by helping us manage multiple customers and tens of thousands of resources while retaining performance and visibility due to its multi-cloud support. We do not have to worry about jumping from one platform to another, and the better MSP support is beneficial from a billing and chargeback automation standpoint. The integration in compliance helps identify missing areas within our customer environments and improves them. On average, it has helped us provide approximately 15 to 20% savings through right-sizing or idle resource elimination. These are some of the immediate cost savings our customers have experienced after implementing recommendations from the tool.
MK
Technical Associate at ZS
Templatized pipelines have improved efficiency while limitations in code-based development remain
Harness UI can do a lot of good things. Harness's UI should not feel very complicated. At the current stage, it feels very commercialized and compared to other platforms such as Argo CD or Jenkins, which feel much more lively and much more simple. Infrastructure as code or pipeline as code is something that Harness severely lacks. There is not a lot of good support for pipeline as code, and I often find myself not using pipeline as code the way other platforms such as GitHub Actions or Jenkins integrate pipeline as code. Pipeline as code is definitely one of the disadvantages when it comes to Harness. Additionally, the entire platform feels very commercialized, which is something that a lot of developers, especially open-source enthusiasts, might not appreciate even within the organization. One of the very important key factors I observed was that there is no way to execute nested pipelines, which means that we cannot execute child pipelines within child pipelines and child pipelines even within those child pipelines. There is no way to execute nested pipeline execution, which may or may not be required based on the use case, but it is definitely one of those features that I wish the platform had.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
15%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?
Pricing is feature-tiered under the MSP licensing, and I would say the pricing was quite competitive and fair. It was neither inexpensive nor too costly compared to competition, yet it provides goo...
What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?
Areas where CloudCheckr can be improved include simplifying the user experience, as some areas seem complex to my teammates, who felt overwhelmed by the many dashboards available. Another area is d...
What is your primary use case for CloudCheckr ?
My main use cases for CloudCheckr include cloud cost visibility and optimization, identifying idle resources, right-sizing, and cost trends. I also use it from a cloud governance perspective, for s...
What needs improvement with Harness?
One improvement I see for Harness is simplifying the configuration process for smaller teams or startups, as the platform offers powerful features that new users may require some time to understand...
What is your primary use case for Harness?
Harness automates the CI/CD pipelines and manages applications deployments across different environments like staging, development, and production. I use it to monitor the deployments and ensure st...
What advice do you have for others considering Harness?
I appreciate that Harness provides good visibility into pipeline execution and deployment status, and I appreciate how it simplifies the complex CI/CD workflows. Its automation features help reduce...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP
Armory
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility
Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudCheckr vs. Harness and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.