

CloudCheckr and Harness operate in the cloud management and continuous delivery categories, respectively. Harness appears to have an advantage due to its superior features, despite CloudCheckr's favorable pricing and support.
Features: CloudCheckr focuses on cost management, resource optimization, and security features that provide visibility and control over cloud costs. Harness focuses on deployment automation, continuous delivery, and governance, facilitating software delivery processes.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudCheckr offers a customizable deployment model with extensive support for cloud integration, emphasizing flexibility. Harness presents a user-friendly deployment model, leveraging automation to simplify continuous integration, which aligns with a priority on automation.
Pricing and ROI: CloudCheckr is cost-effective, concentrating on cloud spend optimization and delivering ROI through cost management. Harness might have higher initial costs but provides a strong ROI by accelerating software delivery cycles. Differences are evident in upfront versus long-term cost considerations and ROI outcomes.
It has reduced manual efforts that would otherwise be spent checking where spending is occurring and ensuring all teams use resources correctly.
I have seen a return on investment of 100%, with significant cost avoidance and measurable savings within the first few months of deployment.
I've seen a return on investment, as the savings are concrete, measurable, and they show up directly in the AWS bill.
The AI features that they have and with which we can rewrite the pipeline and troubleshoot issues significantly saved time.
By adopting templates and various different pipelines across our own IDP platform, we have saved upwards of 30 to 40% of development time.
With Harness, the release process decreased from three or four hours to one or two hours, making deployments much quicker.
The additional support ended up taking longer than expected, with responses that did not meet our need for detailed and technical assistance.
Sometimes support needs to be reached, but they are very responsive and supportive.
The customer support for CloudCheckr is fantastic.
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
We have not faced any customer support issues, with tickets resolved in less than a four-day SLA.
There was an instance when I faced issues with third-party plugins, and after raising a support ticket, they responded in a few hours with a documentation link that resolved my issue.
It scales well for MSPs and large enterprises, allowing for management of hundreds of accounts and tens of thousands of resources while retaining performance and visibility.
Our entire organization uses it with hundreds of applications, and it supports this scale effectively.
It is able to work on our infrastructure side, which is EKS, and we are able to handle our organization growth effectively for an enterprise use case.
When I integrated Harness to more than 20 applications in one place, it becomes less stable.
CloudCheckr is stable and rock solid.
Harness is completely stable, and we are using it in production without facing any stability issues at all.
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
Harness is decently stable.
CloudCheckr is a powerful and feature-rich tool with abundant metrics.
Another area is drift analysis; there have been complaints about tracking optimization opportunities, such as how to track opportunities identified in January and whether they were resolved in February.
An area where CloudCheckr can be improved is pricing.
There is not a lot of good support for pipeline as code, and I often find myself not using pipeline as code the way other platforms such as GitHub Actions or Jenkins integrate pipeline as code.
Improved documentation and onboarding tutorials would help accelerate adoption.
Harness can be improved by providing more clarity on the credits it issues for Harness Cloud, as it has a tiered pricing structure involving license and credit costs, which can get confusing.
Overall, the pricing was quite convenient and represented good value for money.
Pricing is feature-tiered under the MSP licensing, and I would say the pricing was quite competitive and fair.
I won't pretend it's cheap, but we've saved multiples of what we pay for it, so the conversation with finance is straightforward.
From what I understand with respect to Harness, licensing and setup costs were relatively low for an enterprise, and the pricing was more catered toward enterprises who would invest in the technology.
The licensing cost is a little bit too high.
The cost visibility and reporting are really valuable, and the dashboard is informative and enables good decision-making.
What makes CloudCheckr easy for me to use is its intuitive interface.
The best features CloudCheckr offers include out-of-the-box security and compliance check features that provide over 35 different types of compliance checks at no cost, best practice checks, and alerts.
Harness uses AI to suggest errors in case of deployment failures.
The platform also supports cloud-native environments and Kubernetes deployments, making pipeline management easier, and its automation capabilities significantly improve speed and reliability.
If something goes wrong, I can use AI troubleshooting to build or test my fails and analyze the logs, suggesting the fixes.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Harness | 2.2% |
| CloudCheckr | 2.9% |
| Other | 94.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
CloudCheckr offers a cohesive platform for managing cloud infrastructures with a focus on cost visibility, security, and compliance. Designed for multi-cloud environments, it provides insights and optimizations to enhance decision-making and resource efficiency.
CloudCheckr delivers thorough cloud management with features like cost analysis, security and compliance checks, and automated optimization suggestions. Its intuitive interface allows for easy deployment, supporting cost-saving measures. Users often find its cost visibility, multi-cloud integration capabilities, and granular reporting particularly beneficial. However, improvements can be made in areas such as Azure and Google Cloud integration, reporting capabilities, pricing model clarity, and UI complexity reduction.
What are CloudCheckr's key features?Industries using CloudCheckr benefit from enhanced cloud financial optimization and security monitoring. Managed service providers find it crucial for customer billing, while organizations leverage its multi-cloud support for maintaining compliance and governing usage. Specifically useful in sectors like finance and technology, it aids in data analysis and cost-saving strategies.
Harness offers a comprehensive toolset for automating deployment processes and enhancing software update efficiency. It's lauded for its CI/CD capabilities, feature flagging, and real-time deployment monitoring. Key features include an intuitive UI, secret management, and robust rollback functionalities, all contributing to improved productivity and reduced errors in DevOps environments.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.