Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
AWS Cost Explorer Logo

AWS Cost Explorer Reviews

4.5 out of 5

What is AWS Cost Explorer?

AWS Cost Explorer mindshare

Product category:
As of March 2026, the mindshare of AWS Cost Explorer in the Cloud Cost Management category stands at 2.9%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Cost Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AWS Cost Explorer2.9%
Cloudability6.7%
IBM Turbonomic6.3%
Other84.1%
Cloud Cost Management
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 27, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Healthcare Company
13%
Insurance Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
5%
Non Profit
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Media Company
4%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
4%
Retailer
4%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
University
2%
Renewables & Environment Company
2%
Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm
2%
Security Firm
2%
Individual & Family Service
2%
Computer Software Company
2%
Non Tech Company
2%

Compare AWS Cost Explorer with alternative products

Learn more about AWS Cost Explorer

Related questions

 
AWS Cost Explorer Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
DevOps Engineer at GFT Group4.0I've used AWS Cost Explorer for two years to manage cloud spending, finding its visualizations and forecasting useful, though filtering options are limited; it's stable and affordable, with decent support and straightforward integration into our AWS environment.
Mgr Cloud Operations at freelancer5.0I use AWS Cost Explorer to track spending, forecast budgets, and manage financial constraints. It's stable, scalable, integrates easily, and has excellent support. Its forecasting feature is particularly valuable for planning, making it an essential 10/10 tool with no current improvements needed.