No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Cisco Meeting Server Logo

Cisco Meeting Server Reviews

Vendor: Cisco
4.2 out of 5

What is Cisco Meeting Server?

Featured Cisco Meeting Server reviews

Cisco Meeting Server mindshare

As of June 2026, the mindshare of Cisco Meeting Server in the Virtual Meetings category stands at 2.8%, down from 7.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Cisco Meeting Server2.8%
Zoom Workplace Business7.4%
Webex5.2%
Other84.6%
Virtual Meetings
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 27, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Stability

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
17%
Government
12%
Construction Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
5%
Performing Arts
5%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Retailer
3%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
University
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Marketing Services Firm
3%
International Affairs Institute
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Educational Organization
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%

Compare Cisco Meeting Server with alternative products

Learn more about Cisco Meeting Server

Cisco Meeting Server customers

Related questions

 
Cisco Meeting Server Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Voice Network Engineer at Raya Integration4.0I use Cisco Meeting Server for crucial company conferences and video meetings. The screen-sharing feature is valuable, but the GUI needs improvement. We switched from Cisco Webex due to security concerns and preferred the on-premises deployment and scalability options.
Voip Engineer at APK4.5I find Cisco Meeting Server a good, stable, and scalable product with an easy-to-use UI. While installation is difficult due to non-Cisco commands, I still recommend this solution, rating it highly.
Network Analyst at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees5.0After COVID-19, we switched to Cisco Meeting Server for home workers from various platforms like Teams and Zoom. It's an easy solution compared to the complex, expensive Cisco TelePresence Server, but it lacks remote screen control features.
Technical lead at a recreational facilities/services company with 501-1,000 employees4.5I find Cisco Meeting Server stable, easy to manage, and ideal for video conferencing, with great technical support. Its configuration is straightforward, but I wish it integrated with Zoom and Teams for better connectivity.
IT Support Officer at a non-profit with 501-1,000 employees3.0I use Cisco Meeting Server for internal staff meetings, finding it effective for calls. My main frustration is the lack of a built-in recording function, which requires a separate purchase. Despite this, I recommend the solution.