Azure Web Application Firewall Reviews

Azure Web Application Firewall reduces costs compared to options from Fortinet, Check Point, and Palo Alto. Users report savings in administration expenses and improved customer security adherence. AI-based suggestions enhance time efficiency, contributing to favorable financial returns. Applications deployed on this platform achieve better invoicing opportunities and improved investment returns, despite recent exploit threats affecting competitors.

Azure Web Application Firewall's pricing is considered fair and competitive for enterprise buyers. Many organizations appreciate its reasonable costs and ease of management under Microsoft's enterprise agreements. Some users report that while higher SKUs can drive up prices, the overall value and functionality are worth it as it competes well against AWS and GCP. In Brazil, large enterprises find the terms favorable, and many choose Azure WAF for its pricing advantages.

• "The price is reasonable. It is approximately $2,000 US per month."
• "I give the pricing a nine out of ten."
• "Azure WAF has price advantages over other WAF solutions. The pricing model is flexible because you pay on a scale based on the level of protection you need."

Azure Web Application Firewall primarily serves to safeguard services from external threats and manage branch connectivity. Users employ it for traffic filtering, reverse proxy functions, log analytics, and cloud security. It provides layer 7 protection for e-commerce tools and utilizes Microsoft Defender for SQL injection defense. Organizations define custom rules for data routing, block suspicious requests, and create custom access policies, particularly for cloud-dependent applications in a Microsoft environment.

Azure Web Application Firewall support receives mixed responses. Many praise its responsiveness and knowledgeable assistance, particularly appreciating language-specific help. Satisfaction varies with support levels, with higher tiers providing superior service. Some express dissatisfaction without premium plans, citing difficulty getting swift help. Microsoft's response times are generally satisfactory. Experienced users commend dedicated architect assistance, though there are concerns about issue resolution being inefficient at times by support teams. Overall, satisfaction levels with support differ significantly among users.

Azure Web Application Firewall's initial setup is straightforward for most users, often completed in under two hours. Those experienced with Azure find it simpler, while beginners may face challenges. Adequate resources and online guides aid in deployment, although some areas like OpenAI integration may be less documented. Typically, an intuitive interface and comprehensive guides support the process, with configuration taking more time depending on individual familiarity with Azure services.

Azure Web Application Firewall is widely praised for its scalability. Users consider it capable of handling extensive traffic across regions without relying on a specific availability zone. It can be adjusted to fit various needs, with high marks given for its performance and ease of scaling. While requiring certain SKUs for advanced usage, most users find its scalability satisfactory, with many planning to increase their usage.

Azure Web Application Firewall is praised for its stability, with users noting its reliable performance and lack of technical challenges. While some reported occasional issues related to phone service or isolated latency, these were infrequent and manageable. Improvements over the years have fixed past stability concerns. Most users find it stable, rating it highly, typically an eight or nine out of ten, expressing satisfaction with its consistent and dependable operation.