Azure Backup Reviews

My major use case for Azure Backup is to back up our drives or data, usually when we need to store them and replicate in multiple locations.

The ransomware protection feature in Azure Backup helps with my data security.

The support for incremental backups in Azure Backup is configured to affect my storage requirements as well. If a file size or some files are big, stored in this drive and it is continuously increasing over time, we are using this incremental backup for that purpose as well.

The centralized monitoring feature in Azure Backup helps with my data management because we have Azure Monitor for this.

My experience with data recovery capabilities in Azure Backup, I think they have implemented it well, and it positively affects my continuity planning.

The benefits I see from Azure Backup are that this solution is beneficial; we can access the data or files in Azure Backup anywhere, anytime. Also, from a security point of view, we can restrict the access for the parties, and there are many benefits. Additionally, there is no need for infrastructure; we can scale up and scale down whenever there is a requirement or if the size increments for this scale-up. All these features associate with this backup product.

Azure Backup supports all the features that we need, so additional features are not an immediate need for me.

The documentation for Azure Backup seems okay for me; it is good overall, but it should be more descriptive for each item. It should elaborate more on how backup and restore are fulfilled in different scenarios.

One of the reviews indicates that Azure Backup needs improvements for specific backup options beyond just full VM snapshots. I believe it should be improved actually. Regarding specific backup options, I say there should be improvements compared to how they provided them in older days.

I have been using Azure Backup for a while now.

Regarding the stability of Azure Backup, that is as per the usage, but I would say it is generally stable.

The scalability of Azure Backup is quite easy and affordable to scale, with many improved features like data transfer, so in every aspect, I think they are doing great.

The support from Microsoft is actually good; I have had positive experiences with it. I think I can give support from Microsoft eight out of ten, as sometimes they are unsupportive due to certain issues; I already faced a situation where the provided solution did not match my requirements, but we resolved the issue.

Positive

We are not using any other product for the backup, so I have not worked with something similar to Azure Backup.

The installation of Azure Backup is straightforward because it is supported by Azure, Microsoft, so that is not a questionable thing.

Regarding the pricing of Azure Backup compared to other solutions on the market, I do think Azure is quite affordable, as it is on a usage basis for storage.

The support from Microsoft is actually good; I have had positive experiences with it.

For the solution in general, I would also rate it eight out of ten, where ten points is the best product.

The centralized monitoring feature of Azure Backup has helped my customers with data management strategy because we have Azure Monitor itself. Similar to CloudWatch in Azure, I have Azure Monitor available.

The most valuable features I find in Azure Backup are related to their mandatory cloud platform, which requires us to use their own platform. Azure Backup does support incremental backups, offering both incremental and full backup options.

Azure Backup can be improved by providing an option and a utility so we can restore quickly instead of any manual intervention. Restoration times require manual backup and manual interventions, and we need a storage account for these processes. I have no other additional features I would request in the next release of Azure Backup.

I have been working with Azure Backup for more than one and a half years.

I think the technical support by Microsoft is good overall, and I would rate their technical support as an eight from 1 to 10.

Positive

Regarding Azure Backup's ransomware protection, ransomware is not a part of this function as it is isolated and therefore not applicable.

This function has affected my customer's storage requirements because they have a policy where some servers have daily backup and some servers have weekly backup. We schedule accordingly based on these requirements.

My customer's experience with Azure Backup's data recovery capabilities is good. It has affected their business continuity planning as per our documentation, where they provided the RPO and RTO specifications.

I measure the effectiveness of Azure Backup in meeting regulatory compliance requirements using third-party tools and enterprise tools. We apply them on a daily basis over the applications and from an operating system perspective. In the backup, we have encryption applied, so there is no chance to retrieve it unless Azure Backup has some default fault.

I would definitely recommend Azure Backup to others. If any customer has a certain cloud provider, they definitely need to use it.

I provide this review with an overall rating of 7.5.

A typical use case for Azure Backup is to handle multiple functions such as file shares and VM databases. These are what we're using.

The best features of Azure Backup are its ease of restoration without any challenges; I've never seen something similar to that. Whatever backup we have, we can restore it. That is what I value most because if you have a backup, it should be easy to restore. Additionally, we can modify the backup tendency.

Areas of Azure Backup that have room for improvement include the VM backup, which creates multiple snapshots. When I select a snapshot every two days, it creates numerous snapshots, but during restoration, it provides only very few of them for the full restore. This consumes space due to multiple snapshots.

I have approximately four years, or 3.5 years of experience working with Azure Backup.

Azure Backup is stable.

Azure Backup is a highly scalable solution.

I would rate technical support from Microsoft as five or six out of ten.

They generally ask many questions when I log a ticket, but it's very difficult to find the solution. They will ask for backup or logs or whatever it is. If I log 10 cases, we get an immediate solution for only three or four. We keep moving forward, and by the time they come with a solution, we have already resolved the issue.

Neutral

The initial setup of Azure Backup is not difficult.

We have a relationship with Microsoft as a reseller and implementer.

Concerning return on investment, since it's on the same platform, it's actually better. In terms of cost, it's better integrated, so it's really good.

Automation is somewhat difficult for databases when implementing via the Azure DevOps pipeline. We have some challenges connecting from a pipeline to the database; otherwise, it functions well.

I generally don't handle the price component of Azure Backup.

I haven't used the integration with AI in Azure Backup.

Based on my experience, I recommend Azure Backup to other people. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Azure Backup an 8.

The primary use case for Azure Backup is to make the backups of the VMs in Azure. My company is using it since it is available on the platform.

We use the normal features for Azure Backup, specifically to make backups of the VMs. The biggest benefit for us is that the solution is available in the portal.

Azure Backup needs improvements in allowing more specific backup options rather than just full VM snapshots. For instance, it is not a perfect tool for restoring SQL databases since it requires replacing everything instead of restoring specific files. It lacks features for cybersecurity, such as ransomware protection.

I have been working with Azure Backup for five years.

Azure Backup does not fulfill all the requirements we have in the company, so I rate its stability as five out of ten.

Azure Backup is scalable since it is a global solution. You can handle deployment in any region of Azure. It has the same scalability as Azure.

In previous companies, I worked with Veeam, which is primarily an on-premises solution. We also did POCs with Rubrik and another tool, however, these require investment, and the decision depends on the budget for next year.

The setup of Azure Backup is very easy. I would rate it eight out of ten for ease of setup.

Honestly, I have not seen any monetary or time value when working with Azure Backup.

Azure Backup is expensive relative to the value we get from it. I do not have specific details about the licensing cost as it falls under another department.

We have done POCs with Rubrik and another tool. Previously, I worked with Veeam in other companies, specifically in on-premises solutions.

The advice is to first check the requirements of your company and then decide if Azure Backup meets those requirements. In my company, it does not completely fulfill our needs, and we are evaluating new platforms for the following year. 

Overall, I rate Azure Backup as five out of ten.

I use Azure Backup mainly for backing up virtual machines.

The feature I find most effective in Azure Backup is the high-level restore. Additionally, it has a good impact on our cost savings and operational efficiency as it is a low-cost solution.

The area that I believe needs improvement in Azure Backup is the restoring time.

I have almost eight years of experience working with Azure Backup.

I would rate the stability of Azure Backup as nine out of ten; it shows high stability in my experience.

I would rate the scalability of Azure Backup as eight out of ten; it offers good scalability.

The technical support from Microsoft is good; I would rate it eight out of ten.

Positive

Before using Azure Backup, I used a different solution, but I can't remember the name.

The initial setup of Azure Backup was easy.

We handled the deployment ourselves, in-house.

The pricing of Azure Backup is fine; it is a low-cost solution.

Based on my experience, I would definitely recommend Azure Backup to others. It is a good, low-cost solution. Overall, I would rate this solution as eight out of ten.

My primary use case for Azure Backup involves dealing with infrastructure services. As a solution architect, I am familiar with all the services, particularly running AI solutions to aid our processes. Azure Backup has been part of my setup for managing large-scale data.

The most valuable feature of Azure Backup is its simplicity. When using a Microsoft operating system, whether server or Windows, Azure Backup proves to be an excellent product. It integrates well with Microsoft OS, which is still used by many organizations in the market. 

Another valuable feature is its retention policies, which offer both archive and standard options. This allows cost-effective management of older data by moving it from a standard vault to an archive vault.

The reporting functionality of Azure Backup needs improvement. I currently use logic apps and manually configure scripts to enhance the reporting processes.

I have been familiar with Azure Backup for two to three years.

Azure Backup is stable for Microsoft environments, however, integration with VMware is less straightforward.

Azure Backup works well for scaling in environments using Microsoft OS due to its significant market presence.

Microsoft's technical support for Azure products could be improved. 

Positive

The initial setup of Azure Backup requires some changes, and I do require a lot of effort. However, over time, adjustments have been made to improve the setup process.

I generally recommend Azure Backup to others. However, for those actively using VMware platforms, I suggest considering alternative solutions or using a specific AVS solution provided by Microsoft for better integration. 

The overall product is rated ten out of ten.

Our primary use case is data transformation, specifically moving data from source systems to downstream systems for consumption in reports. For example, we build reports on Power BI or Tableau. This involves designing pipelines, moving data, and monitoring to ensure efficiency and automation with minimal human intervention.

Automation provides us more time to work on other tasks, avoiding repetitive tasks and saving hours that we can allocate elsewhere. This gives more free time for involvement in other activities instead of repetitive data pulling.

The most valuable features are the timely backup facility, allowing scheduling of backups, and the speed at which backups occur.

Currently, I do not have suggestions for improvement because I haven't used it extensively. As I gain more experience with it, I might have suggestions. Also, connection with more legacy data services could be beneficial as some are currently unsupported.

I have been using the solution for around six to eight months.

I have not encountered any stability challenges, and it has been very smooth for me.

Our entire organization utilizes the solution, indicating good scalability, with more than one hundred people using it.

The technical support is somewhat limited and not widely available for self-research, but when contacted, Microsoft has been helpful. I would rate their customer support at eight or eight point five out of ten.

Positive

I did not work with any similar tool before using Azure Backup.

We managed the setup with resourceful self-research and relied on Microsoft's support when needed.

In terms of cost savings and recovery times, there hasn't been a need for recovery yet, but retaining data prevents the need to redesign pipelines, which would involve significant costs.

In terms of setup cost and pricing, Azure Backup provides value for money. It is integrated well with other Microsoft services we use.

We did not evaluate any other options due to deep integration within the Microsoft infrastructure.

I recommend Azure Backup for companies within the Microsoft environment because they can take full advantage of its features. For companies frequently accessing data or not using Microsoft Azure, the solution may not be very helpful.

We use Azure for our application and back end software. Most of our servers are on Azure. We have our fleet management and system tracking, and all the data from our thousands of clients are connected to Azure. We provide each client with their own backup solution to help them with disaster recovery.

Azure Backup has helped us reach needed information wherever we are. The compression features reduce storage costs and allow us to store more data using less space. It significantly lowers costs, especially in cloud-based solutions.

As a cybersecurity company, we value the data encryption and security offered by Azure Backup. 

The encryption, both in transit and at rest, provides additional security against data breaches. Azure Backup is also reliable and scalable, allowing for scalability and different storage options like cold and hot storage. 

The compression features save us money and speed up the backup and restore process.

Azure sometimes provides reliable recovery that can be slow for large-scale scenarios. They can add features that allow quicker recovery for large databases or virtual machines. 

Easier configuration and automation would be helpful for cross-region backups, improving disaster recovery for global operations. Enhancements in reporting and analytics could be beneficial.

I have been working with Azure Backup for around eight or nine years.

The solution is very stable. Over the years, we never had any problems with it.

For scalability, I would rate Azure Backup an 8.5 out of ten. Everything needs to be scalable, and it is important for us.

Azure offers 24/7 support and multiple support plans. It depends on what you choose. If you choose the basic, it's limited. 

We've been satisfied because we provide our own support. I understand that if you choose premium support, Azure can dedicate resources for you.

Positive

I tried AWS and Google, however, we have been with Microsoft for more than 18 years. AWS has limited support, which is a problem for me as a consultant.

The setup process can be challenging for someone new or with minimal technical background. However, Microsoft has simplified its interface. The backup interface with the Azure portal is user-friendly, with a wizard guide system. 

Complexity can arise when connecting to databases, but the wizard simplifies the process.

Pricing is middle plus, and it's a bit high. We always wait for prices to reduce, however, Azure sometimes offers special discounts or packages if you commit for more years.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) Backup is a competitor. AWS is good for heavy environments but lacks support compared to Azure.

Reporting and analytics improvements with AI technology would be helpful. The setup process is brief and user-friendly with clear steps at each stage.

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

I use Azure Backup primarily for backing up virtual machines, storage accounts, and SQL databases.

The most valuable features of Azure Backup for us are its flexible retention options and the ability to recover to a second region with geo-replication and read access. These features enable us to create off-site backups, ensuring data recovery in case of a region outage, thus enhancing our disaster recovery capabilities.

Azure Backup could improve by offering better integration for Oracle databases and enhancing features like granular restore and backup compliance capabilities. These additions would further enhance its versatility and usability for a wider range of scenarios.

I have been working with Azure Backup for a few years.

I would rate the stability of Azure Backup as a nine out of ten.

I would rate the scalability of the solution as a seven out of ten. We are gradually implementing Azure Backup in our new environment, and once fully deployed, we expect to use it for around 50 to 60 servers.

I would rate the easiness of the initial setup as an eight out of ten. Setting up Azure Backup was pretty straightforward, especially if you follow the steps in the right order. It might seem a bit complex at first, but with experience, subsequent setups become easier. Planning is key to optimizing its effectiveness.

Deploying Azure Backup typically takes around half an hour to an hour to set up one VM, involving creating a recovery services vault, defining a backup policy, and configuring storage options. For a more comprehensive setup including proper recovery planning, it might take a few hours. The key steps involve creating a resource group, and a recovery services vault, selecting a storage type, and defining backup policies. I deployed the solution myself.

I would rate the pricing of Azure Backup around six or seven out of ten in terms of affordability, considering the total cost. The pricing depends on factors like storage choices and retention needs, but overall, it is considered affordable and works well for both on-premises and Azure environments, particularly in Windows environments.

I can restore VMs easily with Azure Backup, although I don't need to do it regularly. However, I have tested it, and it works exactly as expected.

Azure Backup is our top choice for data protection, offering native backup for critical systems like SAP HANA and SQL. Its automation capabilities ensure seamless backups, significantly improving our organization's data management efficiency.

The most beneficial feature of Azure Backup for our data protection strategy has been centralization through Backup Center, allowing us to manage and monitor all backups in one place.

Azure Backup meets our compliance requirements by encrypting all backups at rest, ensuring data protection. Additionally, role-based access control allows us to manage who can access the backups.

Maintaining backups and restores with Azure Backup is straightforward, especially compared to more complex solutions like NetBackup and data domains.

Before implementing Azure Backup, it is crucial to understand your business requirements, including recovery objectives like RPO and RTO. This cloud-native solution is straightforward to set up and manage, but aligning it with your specific needs ensures optimal performance and effectiveness.

Overall, I would rate Azure Backup as a nine out of ten.

Like any backup product, we use Azure Backup to have a secure backup and restore it. Azure backup itself is provisioned on the Azure portal with the Azure products. We are a gold partner with Microsoft, and we use all Microsoft products in our enterprise.

Azure Backup is easy to configure and restore. You can use Azure Backup to backup on-premises servers as well.

The solution’s user interface could be improved and made better. Microsoft would declare a support issue as an application-level issue because there is no differentiation at the user level, and they won't restore.

I have been using Azure Backup for the last 5 years.

We had some issues in the past with the solution's stability.

I rate the solution’s stability a seven out of ten.

Our company has around 70,000 employees, and over 200 VMs are currently used for data backup.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten for scalability.

Microsoft's support needs to zero down the specialist because they have a different expert at every component level. When you try to reach them, they will just pass it on to a different team every time, which takes a long time. In case of a major incident, it's really scary to wait long to get the exact technical expert to work on it.

Neutral

The solution’s initial setup is simple.

We implemented the solution through an in-house team.

Azure Backup is a moderately priced solution.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive and ten is cheap, I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten.

I would recommend Azure Backup to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.