Azure Backup vs Cohesity DataProtect comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 19, 2023
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Backup
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
7th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cohesity DataProtect
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
8th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
69
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Backup (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Azure Backup is 3.2%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cohesity DataProtect is 4.1%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Backup and Recovery
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Cloud Backup
6.2%
 

Featured Reviews

SyedAbid Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 2, 2023
The solution protects the infrastructure of an organization, but it should be made more application-aware
Azure Backup is a mandatory service. We have recommended every client to use Azure Backup. Many resources and databases are being backed up on Azure in different zones and regions We have multiple clients. Some of them have data centers. They have 100 to 200 virtual machines. We have set backups,…
BN
Oct 6, 2022
Centralized interface is simple to navigate, reduces storage space and related costs
We are the largest organization in Europe and have 10,000 servers in-house being protected by Cohesity. We use several solutions including Archive, DR, SAP, Oracle, VMware, and others. Our business thrives on Cohesity storage. Cohesity makes data management as simple as Sign Up, Connecting, and…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The backup features are very useful."
"First of all, you can schedule a backup for the client. You can schedule it as you like. You can also control the bandwidth, so the backup will not utilize. The internet will depend on the bandwidth."
"The most valuable features of Azure Backup for us are its flexible retention options and the ability to recover to a second region with geo-replication and read access."
"Azure Backup is good because it is entirely cloud-based, which means that you can be 99.9% sure that your backup is safe."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Backup is the native backup capabilities."
"It's very simple to configure which is very useful. It's not complex to configure it."
"The MARS agent makes it easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the ease in which it backs up our data."
"It's stable."
"The customer service and support are fast and professional."
"It works well with backup virtual machines and SQL services we have been using."
"We can run test scripts on production data."
"Backups are quick and painless to set up.​"
"It's completely reliable and easy to restore."
"Cohesity is a cost-effective storage designed for secondary or archival data. It also integrates well with a number of other systems, like VMware, Pure Storage, or AWS with its large array of APIs available to the user."
"The recovery process is effective, especially when it comes to other types of data, such as VMs, and overall, the performance is commendable."
 

Cons

"Azure Backup must include features similar to enterprise solutions."
"The compression ratio of the backup data should be improved."
"In Avamar, the file-based restores are very quick and fast, whereas, in Azure Backup, VM restore is super easy, but if I have to do a file or a folder restore, I have to mount the entire VM image. I have to wait for some time for it to be mounted, and then I have to go inside and then check the file and copy it somewhere. It's a bit of a manual process, whereas in Avamar, you can directly select a file and folder, and it'll recover with whatever permissions you want."
"It still does not have a lot of customization, especially if your workloads are not in Azure."
"The solution should involve more redundancy types in the backup storage and support open-source OS."
"Azure Backup is limited to certain workloads. It would be helpful if Microsoft focused on enabling backups for Oracle and other unsupported databases."
"Azure Backup could improve by offering better integration for Oracle databases and enhancing features like granular restore and backup compliance capabilities."
"The integration with the record database and integration with other applications will be good, especially with the database piece."
"In terms of what could be improved, it just needs some maturity."
"The error handling could be improved."
"Physical RDMs on virtual machines could be a bit easier to configure and plan out."
"Cohesity DataProtect can improve in the area of databases. We have had some challenges with both Cohesity and Rubrik being able to effectively back up in a timely manner the SQL Oracle workloads."
"We are highly dissatisfied with the level of support and functionality provided for HANA within the Cohesity product."
"The tool could benefit from further improvements in AI features, particularly in areas such as a generative AI chat interface. This feature could help answer queries about the data being protected. One feature that would greatly improve our experience with the product is the ability to identify data redundancies through a central console. This feature would help us reduce storage costs by managing redundant data."
"I like that Cohesity offers the chance to have data on-premises and on the cloud. All the data is automatically sent to the cloud."
"Quality testing of upgrades should be somewhat improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's pricing is a three or four out of ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is costly."
"Price-wise, it's similar to AWS."
"Customers prefer Azure Backup because it has a pay-as-you-go model, and they won't have to pay an upfront amount at the initial level."
"The pricing of this solution is good, and it is one of the easiest things that you can sell Azure with."
"We are paying about $100,000 USD per year, just for a couple of servers."
"The price is pretty good, maybe $30 for a machine, I can't complain."
"This is an expensive solution in the Bangladesh marketplace."
"It is a bit costly initially, but it is well worth it in the long run, especially for fighting against a number of threats, such as ransomware, which the IT industry is facing."
"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. It is cheaper than other backup solutions."
"If SQL is in heavy use at your location, I would highly recommend narrowing your PoC testing to Cohesity and Rubrik. They will be competitive on pricing with each other, so really put them through the paces."
"Ensure that you understand the per TB licensing model. Also, Exchange backups are not native to Cohesity and require Kroll."
"Cohesity came in at the best price."
"My advice is to always negotiate for better pricing."
"Cohesity came in at the best price. Setup was included and done in half a day."
"The solution's pricing is quite high, more so than that of its competitors, Veeam, Veritas and Rubrik."
"We purchased support from Cohesity to ensure that should we face an issue, we don't have to deal with different service providers."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
36%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Azure Backup differ from Veeam Backup & Replication?
Veeam has a version for Azure but there are organizations, like ours, that are considering moving to an Azure environment and wonder if Azure Backup is better than Veeam Backup and Replication (Vee...
What do you like most about Azure Backup?
Azure Backup is easy to configure and restore.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Backup?
Customers choose their backup tool based on its flexibility and cost-effectiveness. Customers prefer Azure Backup because it has a pay-as-you-go model, and they won't have to pay an upfront amount ...
What do you like most about Cohesity DataProtect?
Several features enable us to perform fast recovery, such as instant fast recovery. All our virtual machines protected with the product can be quickly restored to another healthy environment with m...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cohesity DataProtect?
Typically on-premises nodes/clusters are deployed for primary backup (to enable instant mass restore) so price will be dependent on chosen OEM and capacity required. MSPs like us utilise PPU licens...
What needs improvement with Cohesity DataProtect?
There is room for improvement in terms of price. In future releases, I would like to see a more comprehensive cyber resilience capability.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Cohesity
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Somerset County Council, Kardem, PCL Construction
Tribune Media
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Backup vs. Cohesity DataProtect and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.