Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
2022-01-12T16:57:44Z
Jan 12, 2022
The most valuable features are application filtering, content filtering, the intrusion prevention system (IPS), and definitely the application firewall.
Network Security Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2020-07-27T07:17:00Z
Jul 27, 2020
Juniper is more flexible with the commit check and the commit confirmed command. The design of the forwarding and contract plan in the operating system is very important for the performance when we have very big traffic.
IT Manager at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2019-09-11T10:12:00Z
Sep 11, 2019
There are a few valuable features that offer very good quality on the solution. Especially NetScreen. We used to use NetScreen for the the product line. It was a very mature solution, very robust, easy to configure, easy to manage, etc. It made it easy to do everything.
Network Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
2019-07-07T06:35:00Z
Jul 7, 2019
It's much faster to deploy a power source. If you need to deploy a firewall in the cloud of software, it's much easier and much faster than deploying the office firewall in a rush.
A firewall is a device used for network security. It monitors network traffic (both incoming and outgoing) and then, based on a set of security rules, either permits or blocks data packets.
The technical support services are excellent.
The command feature is valuable.
The tool's most valuable features are routing features and service quality.
The product's scalability is good, and my company has 150 users.
The solution has good features.
The product’s quality and performance are better than other vendors.
We like the solution’s protocol and its dashboard system.
The pricing is reasonable.
The hardware is stable.
This solution works well. Their switches and firewall are good.
It's basic functionality is probably the most valuable feature.
The most valuable features are application filtering, content filtering, the intrusion prevention system (IPS), and definitely the application firewall.
It is deployed on the customer site, and we manage the firewalls on this side.
The dashboard, customization, API, and pricing are good.
The initial setup is pretty simple.
It's a very powerful solution and the firewalls offer high performance
I'm told the solution is the fastest, and, so far, I do find that to be the case.
Juniper is more flexible with the commit check and the commit confirmed command. The design of the forwarding and contract plan in the operating system is very important for the performance when we have very big traffic.
The architecture of the OS in Juniper is very good. It's flexibility, scalability, and the technicality is also good.
There are a few valuable features that offer very good quality on the solution. Especially NetScreen. We used to use NetScreen for the the product line. It was a very mature solution, very robust, easy to configure, easy to manage, etc. It made it easy to do everything.
The initial setup was very straightforward. There was no problem. The initial deployment took about one hour.
It's much faster to deploy a power source. If you need to deploy a firewall in the cloud of software, it's much easier and much faster than deploying the office firewall in a rush.
The features we found most valuable are using the IDS and IPS during protection. The application filtering feature is great.
It is easy for me to go in and update settings, make changes, or add/remove rules or security.
The authentication part is seamless and easy for people.
The technical support has been good.