Eggplant Test vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

Keysight Technologies and Progress Software are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.7, while Progress Software is ranked #25. Keysight Technologies holds a 3.8% mindshare in TAt, compared to Progress Software’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 18 Eggplant Test reviews

2,718 Views
1,530 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

674 Views
428 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Telerik Test Studio and Eggplant Test compete in the software testing space. Eggplant Test has the upper hand with its extensive automation capabilities, making it ideal for those seeking advanced functionalities.

Features: Telerik Test Studio offers scriptless testing, a comprehensive integration suite, and PDF validation. Eggplant Test provides image-based testing, cross-platform compatibility, and a digital twin tool for process visualization.

Room for Improvement: Telerik Test Studio could enhance its advanced automation features and improve cross-platform compatibility. Eggplant Test can simplify deployment processes, refine its OCR functionality, and enhance integration with additional systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Telerik Test Studio is known for its easy deployment and robust support, making it accessible for immediate use. Eggplant Test, while more complex to deploy, offers excellent customer service suitable for technical environments needing substantial assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Telerik Test Studio is cost-effective with a strong ROI for budget-conscious setups. Eggplant Test demands a higher initial investment but delivers significant long-term ROI through enhanced automation and scalability in diverse environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Telerik Test Studio

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th)

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (24th), Load Testing Tools (22nd), Regression Testing Tools (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 3.8%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 0.8%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Tayyaba Noreen

Student at SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY

Empowers effective test automation with comprehensive platform coverage and scalability

There was no free trial in it. So, I studied it through a page that tells how it works. It will be good if a free trial is provided for users. Moreover, I would like to give some feedback on the installation process. There are other tools that are much easier to install and get started with. Eggplant could improve its installation process.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We did see a massive return on investment from using Eggplant."

"Eggplant Test is valuable due to its OCR technology, which is independent of underlying technologies and can identify applications based on labels such as 'username' and 'password'."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create code from a flow chart, and then run the code through it."

"It provides very strong cross-platform support."

"The solution is based on a Windows model, where adding users is just a few clicks. It is easy to manage users and add them."

"The main feature of Eggplant Test is that it can do fully automated web testing and app testing."

"DAI's newest release allows us to test via scripts rather than models, because we have done 95 percent of our development in functional, not through modeling. I am really happy that then we can use the controller to run scripts rather than having to translate things to models. There are lots of options."

"Its scalability is good. It is useful for desktop applications, and it also uses OCR and does image recognition."

More Eggplant Test pros

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

Cons

"Its performance and stability could be better."

"A step forward would be to have event support, because it is more or less linear at the moment."

"There was no free trial in it."

"The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab and it would create a template of a constructor for me... It would be great, when I want to create a new function, if there were shortcut commands like those that helped create all of the functions, or if there were shortcut features to do any of the complex plans."

"The language is too specific; it is just for Eggplant."

"Since there are very few customers in the Indian region, there is no training available, and it's challenging to find skilled talent."

"In terms of additional features, it would be helpful to have one package for all testing. You have the manager, the AI, then you have functional, and about 10 different packages for installing."

"It has low productivity."

More Eggplant Test cons

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It probably has a yearly license."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Healthcare Company

10%

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Eggplant Manager?

The solution is a stable one.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 22% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 16% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Eggplant Test

Compared 11% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 10% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 8% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 38% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 18% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 17% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 13% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

April 2025

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

April 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

No data available

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Telerik Test Studio

April 2025

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.