BlazeMeter vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

Perforce and Progress Software are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Perforce is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while Progress Software is ranked #24. Perforce holds a 0.6% mindshare in FT, compared to Progress Software’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

BlazeMeter

Read 49 BlazeMeter reviews

404 Views
161 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

925 Views
473 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BlazeMeter

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

BlazeMeter and Telerik Test Studio are competitors in the software testing market. BlazeMeter is preferred for its ease of use and cost-efficiency, while Telerik Test Studio is notable for its advanced capabilities, making it a robust choice for detailed testing despite the higher price.

Features: BlazeMeter offers seamless integrations and automation for load testing, ideal for both cloud and on-premises setups, with flexible contract options and the ability to handle complex user loads. Telerik Test Studio provides script-free testing and in-depth end-to-end test coverage, catering to teams needing comprehensive testing tools and simple PDF validation features.

Room for Improvement: BlazeMeter could enhance its real-time analytics and simplify integration with non-standard tools. It would benefit from better user guidance in complex scenario setups. Telerik Test Studio can improve in reducing its complexity for first-time users, streamline its integration with agile processes, and require a less steep learning curve for novice users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlazeMeter offers straightforward cloud deployment, quick to implement with robust technical support. Telerik Test Studio requires a more involved setup due to its extensive feature set; however, it provides excellent customer service to assist with this complexity, ensuring smooth deployment and user education.

Pricing and ROI: BlazeMeter is often more affordable with a lower initial setup cost, making it attractive for teams prioritizing load testing ROI. Telerik Test Studio, while having a higher upfront cost, delivers better ROI for teams leveraging its extensive capabilities for broad test coverage. BlazeMeter focuses on cost savings, whereas Telerik emphasizes the value of its comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed BlazeMeter vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter vs. Telerik Test Studio

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlazeMeter

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

9th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (6th)

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

17th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BlazeMeter is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.1%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Manoj Raghavendra

Director at SMKR Consultancy LLP

Provides global load simulations without managing infrastructure and offers built-in reporting features

BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for. The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use. Additionally, if there is no host in preferred locations such as some Asian or Middle Eastern countries, it might not be convenient to use BlazeMeter.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The baseline comparison in BlazeMeter is very easy, especially considering the different tests that users can easily compare."

"It supports any number of features and has a lot of tutorials."

"The stability is good."

"In our company, various teams use BlazeMeter, particularly appreciating its cloud license software, which supports up to 5,000 users. BlazeMeter's cloud capabilities allow us to load test or simulate traffic from any location worldwide, such as Europe, North America, South America, Australia, and even specific cities like Delhi. So, with one cloud license, we can simulate user load from various locations globally."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that BlazeMeter provides easy access to its users while also ensuring that its reporting functionalities are good."

"One thing that we are doing a lot with the solution, and it's very good, is orchestrating a lot of JMeter agents. This feature has helped us a lot because we can reuse other vendors' performance scripts that they have used with JMeter before."

"BlazeMeter has provided me with a vast cloud platform to run JMeter script files, eliminating the need for storage or load providers."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to run high loads and generate reports."

More BlazeMeter pros

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

Cons

"Sometimes, when we execute tests, the results calculated by BlazeMeter, specifically the response times for failed transactions, are incorrect."

"Version controlling of the test cases and the information, the ability to compare the current version and the previous version within Runscope would be really nice. The history shows who made the changes, but it doesn't compare the changes."

"One problem, while we are executing a test, is that it will take some time to download data. Let's say I'm performance testing with a high-end load configuration. It takes a minimum of three minutes or so to start the test itself. That's the bad part of the performance testing... every time I rerun the same test, it is downloaded again... That means I have to wait for three to four minutes again."

"BlazeMeter does not provide integration with the Aternity tool."

"From a performance perspective, BlazeMeter needs to be improved...BlazeMeter has not found the extensions for WebSockets or Java Applet."

"Integration with APM tools like Dynatrace or AppDynamics needs to be improved."

"The customer service is not available 24/7, which affects its rating. I would rate it as a seven because they respond once they are available."

"Having more options for customization would be helpful."

More BlazeMeter cons

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When compared with the cost of the licenses of other tools, BlazeMeter's license price is good."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive."

"The solution is free and open source."

"The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"The product isn't cheap, but it isn't the most expensive on the market. During our proof of concept, we discovered that you get what you pay for; we found a cheaper solution we tested to be full of bugs. Therefore, we are willing to pay the higher price tag for the quality BlazeMeter offers."

"It's consumption-based pricing but with a ceiling. They're called CVUs, or consumption variable units. We can use API testing, GUI testing, and test data, but everything gets converted into CVUs, so we are free to use the platform in its entirety without getting bogged down by a license for certain testing areas. We know for sure how much we are going to spend."

"It is an averagely priced product."

More BlazeMeter pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?

Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...

See all answers

What do you like most about BlazeMeter?

It has a unique programming dashboard that is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BlazeMeter?

BlazeMeter's pricing depends on the type of account used. They offer multiple account types, with cost variations based on features accessible under each account.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs BlazeMeter

Compared 49% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs BlazeMeter

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs BlazeMeter

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs BlazeMeter

Compared 4% of the time

k6 Open Source vs BlazeMeter

Compared 3% of the time

More BlazeMeter Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 36% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 18% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 15% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 12% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter

June 2025

Download BlazeMeter product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

May 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Also Known As

JMeter Cloud

No data available

Overview

BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.

The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.

Perforce

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter vs. Telerik Test Studio

May 2025

Free Report: BlazeMeter vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about BlazeMeter vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlazeMeter vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Load Testing Tools vendors, and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.