Parasoft SOAtest vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

Parasoft and Progress Software are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Parasoft is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.7, while Progress Software is ranked #23. Parasoft holds a 2.5% mindshare in FT, compared to Progress Software’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

5,105 Views
2,246 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

2,312 Views
1,457 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and Telerik Test Studio are competing software testing tools. Parasoft SOAtest edges out for those valuing comprehensive testing features, while Telerik Test Studio appeals due to its user-friendly nature and flexibility.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest provides powerful integration, extensive protocol support, and automation for API testing. It offers custom scripting options, broad coverage across various programming languages, and robust support for REST and web services. Telerik Test Studio provides intuitive automation testing, ease in creating complex test cases with minimal coding, and integrates features for data-driven testing. Its record and play feature enhances UI testing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could benefit from simplification in initial setup, improved usability for non-technical users, and more streamlined updates. Telerik Test Studio could enhance advanced customization options, expand its integration possibilities with third-party tools, and improve its API testing extensively. Both could better address scalability challenges.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest requires complex deployment needing technical expertise but has a strong support system to assist users. Telerik Test Studio offers a straightforward deployment process, backed by accessible and responsive support, enhancing overall user experience. Parasoft demands depth while Telerik emphasizes simplicity and fast usability.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest involves higher setup costs, highlighting its extensive features and investment value. It assures considerable ROI through its advanced functionalities. Telerik Test Studio provides a more affordable option with lower initial costs and faster ROI, appealing to teams needing efficient, budget-conscious solutions. Pricing reflects Parasoft's capabilities but emphasizes Telerik's cost-effectiveness and quicker returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

14th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th), API Testing Tools (9th)

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

23rd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (12th), Regression Testing Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 2.5%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.9%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Parasoft SOAtest	2.5%
Telerik Test Studio	1.9%
Other	95.6%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As an expert user, you can accomplish a lot with this tool."

"They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic."

"We have seen a return on investment."

"We can now test as early as possible, so we are achieving better control over our components."

"Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used."

"The toolset is really good, I'm really impressed with it."

"One key feature of using SOAtest tool is that it provided us early entry in testing cycle without any services."

"It totally gives control to the end user to play with data and deploy the changes directly and that reflects in the application."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

"The object repository is the most valuable feature, as different elements can be identified and reutilized through the repository across other scripts, and the product has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

Cons

"The features of SOAtest used for testing (web) applications on user interface level suffice for very basic web applications, but there are better tools on the market."

"We noticed that our project workspace is sometimes corrupted without any reason."

"Work file [tst] gradually increases in size due to saving or updates of workspace. I can see a major improvement in that."

"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

"Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements."

"More descriptive reports are needed."

"The need to refresh 'Test Case Explorer' when adding a data source or environment file, can be improved."

"In general, its user-friendliness needs a little improvement since there are a few bugs that still remain."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"We have not seen a return on investment yet."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"The first time I customized the solution, it was quite challenging."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 7% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 6% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 6% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 4% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 2% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

June 2026

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

June 2026

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

No data available

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest is a robust tool for automating test scenarios, supporting a range of interfaces and protocols, making it ideal for comprehensive service testing. Its adaptability in complex environments provides extensive testing capabilities for UI and API automation.

Parasoft SOAtest offers a comprehensive suite of features designed for the efficient setup of functional tests, emphasizing ease in data-driven scenarios and thorough automation. Supporting key protocols like SOAP and REST, alongside UI recording, it integrates seamlessly with Jenkins and GitHub, adding service virtualization for enhanced end-to-end testing. Users benefit from its extensibility through custom scripts, allowing broad API and web service testing. However, there are challenges in user-friendliness, with the graphical interface requiring improvements. Reporting features need enhanced clarity and customization options. Limited cryptography support and documentation necessitate improvement. Performance issues and high pricing are noted drawbacks, but its use in banking and quality enhancement demonstrates significant potential.

What are the key features of Parasoft SOAtest?

Rapid functional test setup: Streamlines the creation of test scenarios efficiently.
Data-driven testing: Enables easy configuration with different datasets.
Extensive automation: Facilitates comprehensive testing for APIs and UIs.
Protocol support: Integrates SOAP, REST, JSON, SAP RFC functionalities.
Service virtualization: Enhances testing across complex system architectures.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Improved testing efficiency: Reduces manual testing efforts significantly.
Enhanced quality assurance: Elevates application reliability and performance.
Integration capabilities: Coordinates well with Jenkins and GitHub for streamlined processes.
Comprehensive testing: Provides thorough coverage for APIs and web services.

Implementing Parasoft SOAtest in industries like banking allows automation of regression tests for web services in SOA architectures, supporting protocols such as ISO 8583. Companies use it to transition from manual testing to automation, integrating JSON and XML, facilitating improved application quality.

Parasoft

Telerik Test Studio empowers users with intuitive automation tools suitable for both novices and experts. Its standout features include robust element fetching and data parameterization, ensuring streamlined automation processes.

Telerik Test Studio is recognized for its powerful object repository which enhances element identification and reuse. Its user-friendly interface simplifies automation, even for newcomers. Integral features like record and play streamline repetitive tasks. The solution strengthens project outcomes with features like performance and load testing, PDF validation for detailed reports, and efficient data parameterization. Compatibility issues with load testing and validation challenges in Excel and Word are areas for improvement. Users require minimal coding effort for end-to-end testing with databases and document validation.

What are the key features of Telerik Test Studio?

Object Repository: Enhances element identification and reuse.
Record and Play: Facilitates task simplification.
Performance Testing: Offers impressive capabilities in load testing.
PDF Validation: Aids in testing detailed reports and documents.
Data Parameterization: Streamlines data management within tests.

What are the noteworthy benefits and ROI aspects?

Intuitive Interface: Welcomes users of all expertise levels.
Automation Efficiency: Simplifies script creation and testing procedures.
Reduced Coding: Minimizes code writing for end-to-end testing.
Performance Validation: Strengthens load and performance evaluations.

Industries like healthcare and HR have embraced Telerik Test Studio for automating UI and functional tests, with on-premises deployment for performance and automation testing. It supports load validation, script creation, and excels in PDF validations, enhancing compatibility with Microsoft tools for expanded future use.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio

June 2026

Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Test Automation Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.