Parasoft SOAtest vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

Parasoft and Progress Software are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Parasoft is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.7, while Progress Software is ranked #24. Parasoft holds a 1.7% mindshare in FT, compared to Progress Software’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

2,343 Views
703 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

1,219 Views
744 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and Telerik Test Studio are competing software testing tools. Parasoft SOAtest edges out for those valuing comprehensive testing features, while Telerik Test Studio appeals due to its user-friendly nature and flexibility.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest provides powerful integration, extensive protocol support, and automation for API testing. It offers custom scripting options, broad coverage across various programming languages, and robust support for REST and web services. Telerik Test Studio provides intuitive automation testing, ease in creating complex test cases with minimal coding, and integrates features for data-driven testing. Its record and play feature enhances UI testing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could benefit from simplification in initial setup, improved usability for non-technical users, and more streamlined updates. Telerik Test Studio could enhance advanced customization options, expand its integration possibilities with third-party tools, and improve its API testing extensively. Both could better address scalability challenges.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest requires complex deployment needing technical expertise but has a strong support system to assist users. Telerik Test Studio offers a straightforward deployment process, backed by accessible and responsive support, enhancing overall user experience. Parasoft demands depth while Telerik emphasizes simplicity and fast usability.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest involves higher setup costs, highlighting its extensive features and investment value. It assures considerable ROI through its advanced functionalities. Telerik Test Studio provides a more affordable option with lower initial costs and faster ROI, appealing to teams needing efficient, budget-conscious solutions. Pricing reflects Parasoft's capabilities but emphasizes Telerik's cost-effectiveness and quicker returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

16th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th), API Testing Tools (10th)

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (14th), Regression Testing Tools (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 1.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Parasoft SOAtest	1.7%
Telerik Test Studio	1.4%
Other	96.9%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

Chirag N M

Senior Quality Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Supports multiple platforms and identifies elements in a good way

Instead of Telerik Test Studio, I'd recommend writing test cases in .Net so that in the future, if you move away from Telerik Test Studio to another tool, it would be easier for you. Your current code would be reusable. You won't have to change your test cases much. We wrote our code in a separate IDE, which was Visual Studio, and internally, we had the infrastructure to interact with Telerik Test Studio. All the internal logic that we needed for our purpose was implemented in .NET, and we used Telerik Test Studio for tests. I'd rate Telerik Test Studio an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

"The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest."

"Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization."

"They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic."

"Automatic testing is the most valuable feature."

"One of the most valuable features I found in Parasoft SOAtest is its ability to extend the product."

"The best feature of Parasoft SOAtest is the extension tool where we can write our custom scripts, integrate with different languages, and customize as per our needs, which helps in a very positive way where things are not available beforehand; we can test with service virtualization."

"We have seen a return on investment."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

Cons

"Reporting facilities can be better."

"UI testing should be more in-depth."

"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

"The summary reports could be improved."

"Enabling/disabling an optional element of an XML request is only possible if a data source (e.g., Excel sheet) is connected to the test. Otherwise, the option is not available at all in the drop-down menu."

"Parasoft SOAtest has an internal refresh function where you can refresh the software to show the changes you’ve made in your projects. Unfortunately this function does not work properly, because it often does not show the changes after you’ve hit te refresh button a few times."

"The performance could be a bit better."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 13% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 12% of the time

Coverity Static vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 7% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 6% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

UBIK Load Pack vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 6% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

January 2026

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

December 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

No data available

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio

January 2026

Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Test Automation Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.