Parasoft SOAtest vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

Parasoft and Progress Software are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Parasoft is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5, while Progress Software is ranked #24. Parasoft holds a 0.7% mindshare in FT, compared to Progress Software’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 31 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

506 Views
213 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

925 Views
473 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and Telerik Test Studio are competing software testing tools. Parasoft SOAtest edges out for those valuing comprehensive testing features, while Telerik Test Studio appeals due to its user-friendly nature and flexibility.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest provides powerful integration, extensive protocol support, and automation for API testing. It offers custom scripting options, broad coverage across various programming languages, and robust support for REST and web services. Telerik Test Studio provides intuitive automation testing, ease in creating complex test cases with minimal coding, and integrates features for data-driven testing. Its record and play feature enhances UI testing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could benefit from simplification in initial setup, improved usability for non-technical users, and more streamlined updates. Telerik Test Studio could enhance advanced customization options, expand its integration possibilities with third-party tools, and improve its API testing extensively. Both could better address scalability challenges.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest requires complex deployment needing technical expertise but has a strong support system to assist users. Telerik Test Studio offers a straightforward deployment process, backed by accessible and responsive support, enhancing overall user experience. Parasoft demands depth while Telerik emphasizes simplicity and fast usability.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest involves higher setup costs, highlighting its extensive features and investment value. It assures considerable ROI through its advanced functionalities. Telerik Test Studio provides a more affordable option with lower initial costs and faster ROI, appealing to teams needing efficient, budget-conscious solutions. Pricing reflects Parasoft's capabilities but emphasizes Telerik's cost-effectiveness and quicker returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

19th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (25th), API Testing Tools (10th)

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (17th), Regression Testing Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.1%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Milind Parab

Sr. Principal Software Engineer at Cadence Design Systems

A stable solution that can be used for automotive compliance and generates good reports

Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings. Going through that is a challenge. It only happens in the initial stage when we are setting up the tool, but it can be improved. Parasoft SOAtest could add code coverage, which will help us do the coverage in a single tool.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios."

"The solution is scalable."

"Technical support is helpful."

"Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization."

"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."

"If you want something that’s not provided out of the box, then you can write it yourself and integrate it with SOAtest."

"They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic."

"One of the most valuable features I found in Parasoft SOAtest is its ability to extend the product."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

Cons

"Reporting facilities can be better."

"Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings."

"During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time."

"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

"One area that could use improvement is the cryptography capabilities in Parasoft SOAtest. It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions."

"The summary reports could be improved."

"The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually."

"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?

Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro. The new management does not want subscription tools around, aiming for scripted tests us...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

One area that could use improvement is the cryptography capabilities in Parasoft SOAtest. It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our ow...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Postman vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 22% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 21% of the time

Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 9% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 36% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 18% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 15% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 12% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

May 2025

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

May 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

No data available

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio

May 2025

Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Test Automation Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.