BrowserStack vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

BrowserStack and Progress Software are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. BrowserStack is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while Progress Software is ranked #24. BrowserStack holds a 10.0% mindshare in FT, compared to Progress Software’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BrowserStack users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

BrowserStack

Read 26 BrowserStack reviews

4,859 Views
4,470 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

1,159 Views
811 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BrowserStack

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

BrowserStack and Telerik Test Studio are competing products within the software testing landscape. BrowserStack offers more accessible pricing and comprehensive support, positioning it favorably for cost-effectiveness and customer service, while Telerik Test Studio's robust feature set appeals to those seeking a comprehensive toolset that justifies a higher investment.

Features: BrowserStack provides a real device cloud, compatibility testing across platforms and browsers, and extensive cross-browser support. Telerik Test Studio offers end-to-end automation capabilities, scriptless testing, and seamless integration, making it well-suited for complex testing scenarios.

Room for Improvement: BrowserStack could enhance its integration process and expand features for specific testing scenarios. Telerik Test Studio might benefit from a simplified deployment model and better ease of use for first-time users. Both products could improve support for additional platforms and devices.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BrowserStack offers a straightforward cloud-based deployment that simplifies setup and access, supported by responsive customer service. Telerik Test Studio's on-premise options make deployment more complex, but it is balanced by robust customer support channels.

Pricing and ROI: BrowserStack is generally seen as having a lower initial setup cost, attracting budget-conscious buyers with a favorable ROI for speed and flexibility. Telerik Test Studio requires a higher upfront investment but delivers considerable ROI through its extensive features for long-term testing benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed BrowserStack vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. Telerik Test Studio

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,513 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BrowserStack

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (1st)

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (15th), Regression Testing Tools (12th), Test Automation Tools (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BrowserStack is 10.0%, down from 11.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.0%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BrowserStack	10.0%
Telerik Test Studio	1.0%
Other	89.0%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

ANand Kale

Sr Practice Lead - Business and Experience Transformation at Peristent Systems

Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users

I integrated BrowserStack into our company's web and application test workflows because it has plugins that work with browsers and applications, allowing for cross-browser testing. BrowserStack was really helpful for cross-browser testing in areas involving mobiles, web applications, or tablets. The tool can help with the testing across all applications. I have not experienced any time-saving feature from the use of the tool. My company uses the product for real-device testing since it has a bunch of devices in our library. My company has a repository where we do manual testing. BrowserStack improved the quality of our company's applications. Improvements I have seen with the testing part revolve around the fact that it is able to do testing at a fast pace. The quality of the product is better since it can go through all the parts of the applications, meaning it can provide high test coverage. The tool is also good in the area of automation. The test coverage is higher, and the time taken during the testing phase is less due to automation. I have not used the product's integration capabilities since my company doesn't have the option to look at other QA testing tools like Selenium, which can be used for the automation capabilities provided. The product should offer more support for cross-browser testing, device testing, and testing across multiple devices. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The device farm is one of the positive impacts we have seen from using BrowserStack."

"I've worked on testing integrations with BrowserStack, particularly with a platform called IT. This involves testing the registration process, including receiving verification codes on devices and phones. BrowserStack has been excellent for testing these integrations, providing a seamless workflow development experience."

"The most valuable feature is that it provides parallel and cross-browser testing. It enables us to run tests on multiple browsers or devices simultaneously."

"The setup was quite simple. The website easily explains how to set it up and if you want to integrate it with BMP tools there are online simple step tutorials."

"The most valuable feature of BrowserStack is the ability to do manual testing."

"It's helpful for me to test on different devices."

"The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult."

"The most valuable feature is the variety the solution offers around the different types of devices, especially mobile devices."

More BrowserStack pros

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

Cons

"I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product."

"BrowserStack is scalable, but cost is significant for those living in Mexico."

"One of the biggest issues with BrowserStack is that if you don't have your network set up by the book, it's hard to get it to work with local desk machines."

"I would like for there to be more integration with BrowserStack and other platforms."

"Connectivity can sometimes mar the testing experience."

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

"Customer support could be better. We tried to implement and explore this product with the vendor or reseller's help, but we haven't had any good response about the product."

"BrowserStack should work on its Internet connectivity although issues only occur occasionally."

More BrowserStack cons

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."

"Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."

"The price is fine."

"This solution costs less than competing products."

"The price of BrowserStack is high."

"BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."

"As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."

"There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,513 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

University

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	10

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BrowserStack?

The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?

My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BrowserStack?

In terms of improvements, they can make it snappier. Everything kind of works. They have locked down the phones, which is problematic because there are some test cases that require access to things...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

LambdaTest vs BrowserStack

Compared 32% of the time

Sauce Labs vs BrowserStack

Compared 24% of the time

Perfecto vs BrowserStack

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs BrowserStack

Compared 5% of the time

CrossBrowserTesting vs BrowserStack

Compared 4% of the time

More BrowserStack Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 26% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 20% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 15% of the time

UBIK Load Pack vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 11% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 9% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack

October 2025

Download BrowserStack product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

September 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Overview

BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

BrowserStack

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. Telerik Test Studio

September 2025

Free Report: BrowserStack vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about BrowserStack vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,513 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BrowserStack vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.