No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Google Container Registry vs Red Hat Quay comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Container Registry
Ranking in Container Registry
10th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat Quay
Ranking in Container Registry
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
3.8
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Container Registry category, the mindshare of Google Container Registry is 3.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Quay is 7.9%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Registry Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Red Hat Quay7.9%
Google Container Registry3.2%
Other88.9%
Container Registry
 

Featured Reviews

Use Google Container Registry?
Leave a review
Marieswaran M - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Instructor at Advantage Pro
Has allowed me to build and deploy containerized applications consistently by integrating automated image updates and CI/CD workflows
The features of Red Hat Quay that I have found most valuable include the ability to switch between the previous version and the newer version; this is an extra feature currently added, and I appreciate this feature. Red Hat Quay's automated image building has helped my CI/CD pipeline efficiency by allowing me to store my source code from GitHub and GitLab to my images. It's very convenient, and it automatically stores my images to deploy in the OpenShift application, making it easier to deploy and run the application without any troubleshooting. The positive impacts I have seen from using Red Hat Quay include the ability to change to a newer version and roll back to the older version. This is the only feature I find beneficial, and I can monitor how many people download my images, which I can verify with the analytics provided. The value of geo-replication in maintaining consistent access to container images is significant since I store data in MongoDB and use the Apache Web Server application running in Quay.io, where I store my images.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.
896,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Insurance Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Red Hat Quay?
I am not facing any kind of issue with Red Hat Quay at this time.
What is your primary use case for Red Hat Quay?
In terms of a specific example of how I use Red Hat Quay, we have an environment where we are managing Terraform code stored in GitLab. We run a pipeline and create a renovate pipeline which checks...
What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat Quay?
If you are considering Red Hat Quay, my advice is that if you have a RHEL environment and you have already purchased the RHEL subscription, then you must use Red Hat Quay because it is easily integ...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Zulily
The Asiakastieto Group, Akbank, TTTECH
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), JFrog, GoHarbor and others in Container Registry. Updated: April 2026.
896,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.