Red Hat Quay and IBM Cloud Container Registry are competing solutions in the container registry category. Red Hat Quay seems advantageous for flexibility and extensive features, while IBM Cloud Container Registry offers strong integration with IBM Cloud services.
Features: Red Hat Quay provides advanced tagging, automatic vulnerability scanning, and a robust permissions model, supporting multiple architectures. IBM Cloud Container Registry offers seamless integration with IBM Cloud services, automated image updates, and a streamlined workflow for developers.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Quay offers flexible on-premise deployment for greater control in enterprise environments and benefits from a strong Red Hat support network. IBM Cloud Container Registry offers a cloud-native deployment reducing setup complexity.
Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Quay has higher setup costs due to on-premise capabilities but offers significant long-term ROI for enterprises seeking control and customization. IBM Cloud Container Registry features an accessible pricing model with reduced upfront costs, appealing for rapid cloud deployment and integration with IBM Cloud investments.
IBM Cloud Container Registry provides a multi-tenant, highly available, private image registry that is hosted and managed by IBM. You can use the registry by adding a namespace that is private to your account and then push images to your namespace. ... A tag is an identifier of an image within a repository.
Red Hat Quay is a private container registry that stores, builds, and deploys container images. It analyzes your images for security vulnerabilities, identifying potential issues that can help you mitigate security risks.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.