Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Qt Squish Logo

Qt Squish Reviews

Vendor: Qt Group
4.4 out of 5
765 followers
Start review

What is Qt Squish?

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Get the Qt Squish Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Qt Squish, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and more!
Qt Squish is the #9 ranked solution in top Test Automation Tools. PeerSpot users give Qt Squish an average rating of 8.8 out of 10. Qt Squish is most commonly compared to Tricentis Tosca: Qt Squish vs Tricentis Tosca. Qt Squish is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 58% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 21% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Qt Squish
May 2025
Get the report
Helped 853,682 peers since 2012

Featured Qt Squish reviews

Read more reviews

Qt Squish mindshare

As of May 2025, the mindshare of Qt Squish in the Test Automation Tools category stands at 3.0%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools

PeerResearch reports based on Qt Squish reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryTest Automation ToolsMay 30, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMay 30, 2025Download
ComparisonQt Squish vs Tricentis ToscaMay 30, 2025Download
ComparisonQt Squish vs Katalon StudioMay 30, 2025Download
ComparisonQt Squish vs OpenText UFT OneMay 30, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Tricentis Tosca4.122.8%96%110 interviewsAdd to research
Katalon Studio3.99.9%89%47 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Qt Squish offers robust UI component identification, seamless integration with CI systems like TeamCity, and compatibility with multiple scripting languages such as Python and JavaScript. It excels in cross-platform support, handles complex UI automation, and provides powerful test script recording with reliable replay capabilities. The IDE is user-friendly with strong tech support and efficient object mapping. BDD and data-driven testing features enhance its flexibility, while excellent documentation supports a wide range of testing frameworks and environments.
  • "It is very stable."
  • "I can perform Java SWT."
  • "Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively."

Room for Improvement

Qt Squish users highlight several areas for enhancement. They note a need for improvements in the IDE's polish, test recording code quality, and object identification. Users mention that Git integration and simplified scripting for non-programmers would add value. There's feedback on slow IDE performance, difficulties with Jenkins integration, and issues with canvas object identification. Additionally, users express a desire for improved cross-version application support and comprehensive reporting capabilities. Improved pricing is also suggested by some.
  • "Support isn't always helpful. I sometimes need to find solutions myself."
  • "You need to set up some special environment variables."
  • "We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."

ROI

ROI from Qt Squish is evident through time saved for QA teams, eliminating manual regression tests, and enabling continuous release cycles. Unlimited licensing maximizes usage across machines. Automated test coverage reached 50% within six months, reducing testing time. Transitioning tests to a CI farm minimized the need for extra staff and local machines. Charitable organizations report infinite ROI with perceptual licenses. While some issues arise, automation benefits are anticipated long-term.

Pricing

Qt Squish pricing is perceived as medium to expensive, with different licenses for multiple platforms or languages. There are two primary license types: fixed (named) and group licenses. Initial costs are around €2000 for one user, with an optional support fee of €800. Annually, developer licenses may cost approximately $5200. Users find the setup straightforward and Froglogic equitable to deal with, but some note the pricing lacks flexibility compared to other tools.
  • "The platform is highly-priced."
  • "It is expensive."
  • "The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

Popular Use Cases

Users leverage Qt Squish for automated GUI testing and regression testing, primarily focusing on table-driven and behavior-driven development testing. Its compatibility with various scripting languages and seamless integration with CI/CD tools and multiple data sources like CSV and databases enhances its usability. Qt Squish supports hybrid applications and distributed batch testing, making it ideal for complex use cases. Its key features include Gherkin Syntax and OCR support, catering to diverse platform requirements across different operating systems.

Service and Support

Froglogic customer service is praised for being quick and effective, with most queries answered in about an hour. They provide timely engineering builds and are open to calls for feature explanations. Although some find support expensive, many highlight its competence and friendliness. Not all experiences are positive, as some find responses lacking, requiring self-reliance. Nonetheless, technical support is often rated highly for efficiency and quick resolution of issues.

Deployment

Initial setup of Qt Squish is generally straightforward, with users finding it easy to install and start using. Many highlight the simplicity of the setup via a self-extracting exe or unzipping a binary. However, some mention challenges when integrating with specific systems, needing technical support, or handling the documentation, which may not be clear for non-programmers. For complex solutions, a thorough review of the documentation is essential. Automated installations and floating licenses add flexibility.

Scalability

Qt Squish is scalable according to users. Many did not encounter issues related to scaling. Its network feature enhances scalability, though it remains untested by some. Users report satisfaction in medium-sized companies and appreciate the floating license that allows easy expansion. Although specific tests can face glitches, scalability is generally rated highly. Some find scalability dependent on the number of classes, allowing only one test with the base license.

Stability

Many users found Squish to be stable, reporting no significant issues. Occasional minor problems were resolved quickly by support. Some observed that stability depends on how tests are designed. Squish was praised for stable performance, with minimal crashes and consistent results. Users rated its stability highly, appreciating its long-standing market presence and infrequent updates, which did not pose issues. Despite some challenges, stability was generally well-regarded by groups using it.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Qt Squish Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
21%
Computer Software Company
16%
Healthcare Company
8%
Transportation Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Educational Organization
6%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
4%
Government
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
University
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Performing Arts
1%
Non Profit
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Construction Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Retailer
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%

Compare Qt Squish with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Qt Squish

Qt Squish was previously known as froglogic Squish.

Qt Squish customers

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Related questions

  • 24
How to Use Froglogic Squish for Qt?
  • 171
Which is the best RPA solution for performance testing automation?
  • 28
What are your recommended Accessibility Testing tools (both open-source and licensed ones)?
  • 127
Why is Test Automation Tools important for companies?
  • 119
What is the best Automated Functional Testing Tool for Testing Pega Applications?
  • 37
What is End-to-End (E2E) test automation?
  • 44
What is the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) life cycle?
  • 4
When evaluating Test Automation tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 8
What performance testing tool do you recommend for web applications?
  • 58
What is the best test automation tool for SAP?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Test Automation Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish
Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish Logo
Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish
OpenText UFT One vs Qt Squish Logo
OpenText UFT One vs Qt Squish
SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish
Sauce Labs vs Qt Squish Logo
Sauce Labs vs Qt Squish
Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish Logo
Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish
LambdaTest vs Qt Squish Logo
LambdaTest vs Qt Squish
Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish Logo
Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish
Testim vs Qt Squish Logo
Testim vs Qt Squish
UiPath Test Cloud vs Qt Squish Logo
UiPath Test Cloud vs Qt Squish
OpenText UFT Developer vs Qt Squish Logo
OpenText UFT Developer vs Qt Squish
LEAPWORK vs Qt Squish Logo
LEAPWORK vs Qt Squish
Telerik Test Studio vs Qt Squish Logo
Telerik Test Studio vs Qt Squish
OpenText Silk Test vs Qt Squish Logo
OpenText Silk Test vs Qt Squish
See all alternatives
 

Qt Squish reviews

Sort by:
Luc Vangrunderbeeck - PeerSpot user
Software Test Engineer at Infrabel
Verified user of Qt Squish
Jan 22, 2025
Product version discussed: For production, I am using version seven point two point one, and I am currently testing with version eight point one.
Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability

Pros

"I can perform Java SWT. "

Cons

"You need to set up some special environment variables."

What is our primary use case?

I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the application.

What is most valuable?

I can perform Java SWT. Additionally, I have been addressing testing issues. It's more focused on whether it will be fast. For the parts that have been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (463 words)
ML
Software Engineer at Ambu GmbH
Verified user of Qt Squish
Oct 29, 2024
Integrated UI testing and good automation overall with an automated installation

Pros

"Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively. "

Cons

"We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."

What is our primary use case?

We use Qt Squish primarily for test automation in our embedded systems. While I configure it and set it up, another person uses it for testing. We also use Squish integrated with Qt, a framework for the user interface, which is a crucial feature for us.

How has it helped my organization?

Squish allows us to automate testing in our systems, which is essential for dealing with complex applications.

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (458 words)
Buyer's Guide
Qt Squish
Download free report
Find out what your peers are saying about Qt Squish. Updated May 2025
853,682 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Luc Vangrunderbeeck - PeerSpot user
Software Test Engineer at Infrabel
Verified user of Qt Squish
Aug 1, 2024
Product version discussed: 6.7.21 , 7.2
A commercial cross-platform GUI and regression testing tool with a useful dashboard

Pros

"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."

Cons

"The price could be better. "

What is our primary use case?

We use Squish to test real time traffic control screens

How has it helped my organization?

Automated testing has clearly some advantages

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (329 words)
HS
Test Automation Specialist at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Verified user of Qt Squish
May 25, 2024
Provides an efficient modular framework and has good technical support services

Pros

"The initial setup process is straightforward. "

Cons

"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."

What is our primary use case?

My primary use case for this solution is for automatic software testing. Specifically, I use it to test software's user interfaces using a test tool that automates these tests. 

What is most valuable?

The product's most valuable feature is its modular framework, which allows for creating testing frameworks and functions adaptable to different user interface objects and libraries, such as Windows Presentation Foundation, the QT Library, and Web interfaces. Its platform independence is a significant advantage.

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (520 words)
AnirbanSarkar - PeerSpot user
Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.
Verified user of Qt Squish
Aug 21, 2023
Product version discussed: Latest version
Seamless functionality, plug-and-play installation, and highly reliable

Pros

"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."

Cons

"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."

What is our primary use case?

froglogic Squish is a tool used for GUI regression testing.

If any of our clients have a particular GUI and they want to do a GUI regression testing or fully automated testing and specifically have the framework, such as Qt, then this solution is a unique solution for that use case.

How has it helped my organization?

This is a great tool to achieve automation for GUI regression testing. This has really reduced the entire release cycle time.

*Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
Read full review (640 words)
VN
Quality Assurance Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Verified user of Qt Squish
May 5, 2021
Product version discussed: 6.6
An all-in-one feature that can cross-cut from QT applications

Pros

"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac. "

Cons

"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

What is our primary use case?

We are customers of Froglogic and I'm an automation quality assurance engineer.

What is most valuable?

This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them, both on Windows OS and on MAC, as well as on mobile operation systems like iOS and Android too. The other value to this product is that it is an all-in-one feature. It has an IDE for developing and debugging, inspector, utilities squishrunner to run test suites and squishserver to connect to AUT via cli.

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (450 words)
RA
Software Solutions Engineer at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.
Verified user of Qt Squish
Jul 9, 2019
Product version discussed: 6.5
Best tool for automated GUI testing

What is our primary use case?

Table-driven testing is our main case. Using Squish, we are able to do table-driven testing very easily. Drive your scripts with data from a variety of data sources such as CSV, TXT, TSV, MS Excel, Databases. One more best thing to mention would be the capability of behavior-driven development testing. Squish uses Gherkin Syntax which is a standard BDD language. Squish can be easily integrated with ALM, continuous integration, build integration, HP Quality Center/HP ALM, Microsoft Visual Studio/TFS/MTM integration, Rational Quality Manager, Seapine, TCM integration, Maven, Ant, TeamCity, Bamboo, Jenkins/Hudson. 

Squish is very good in handling hybrid applications. We can perform behavior-driven development(BDD) in Squish very easily. 

Squish has introduced one new feature which we are waiting from long time i.e., OCR(Optical Character Recognition) Support.

How has it helped my organization?

Previously, for doing table-driven testing, we had to do a lot of circus. Using Squish, we are able to do table-driven testing easily via a straight forward process. We have automated the entire process of running scripts, and Squish will never be stuck. Squish's data-driven testing is very powerful, so it will never be stuck if the size of data is too heavy.

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (433 words)
SW
Sr. Software Solution Engineer at Meteonic Innovation Pvt Ltd at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.
Verified user of Qt Squish
Jun 14, 2019
Test scripts can be created in multiple scripting languages and the execution can be automated

What is our primary use case?

My application includes Qt and Java objects that run on Windows and Linux operating systems. We wanted to perform automated GUI regression testing based on objects so that the same test script can be used in different machines. Our intention is to run regression tests automatically using CI (Jenkins) or scripts. We were looking for a tool that is user-friendly, and test scripts should be created in almost all well-known scripting languages. Squish helped us here.

How has it helped my organization?

We were struggling to create object-based test cases for hybrid applications. Squish saved our time and money by creating reusable operating system independent test scripts. This helped us to automate the test run using CI (Jenkins) and scripts..

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (697 words)