Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Qt Squish | 2.9% |
| Tricentis Tosca | 14.1% |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 6.6% |
| Other | 76.4% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Test Automation Tools | Feb 1, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Feb 1, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Qt Squish vs Tricentis Tosca | Feb 1, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Qt Squish vs Katalon Studio | Feb 1, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Qt Squish vs UiPath Test Cloud | Feb 1, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tricentis Tosca | 4.1 | 14.1% | 96% | 113 interviewsAdd to research |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 4.0 | 6.6% | 87% | 98 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 184 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 79 |
| Large Enterprise | 294 |
Qt Squish was previously known as froglogic Squish.
Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Software Test Engineer at Infrabel | 4.0 | I use Qt Squish mainly for regression and automatic regression tests, focusing on GUI-related testing in Qt. While it supports java SWT, setting up different software versions is cumbersome and requires specific environment variables. Other teams are considering additional tools. |
| Software Test Engineer at Infrabel | 4.0 | I use Squish to control traffic in real-time. The virtual dashboard is a valuable feature, allowing me to view customer results at any time, although I believe the price could be improved. I switched from HP based on colleagues' recommendations. |
| Software Engineer at Ambu GmbH | 4.5 | We use Qt Squish for test automation in our embedded systems, offering valuable integration with Qt for UI tests. While effective, improvements are needed in the embedded environment and ease of upgrading, as integrating upgrades can be bothersome. |
| Test Automation Specialist at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I use froglogic Squish for automatic software testing, particularly user interface testing. Its modular framework and platform independence are valuable, but it could improve basic functionalities like login procedures and multi-screen handling. Overall, it enhances testing adaptability across platforms. |
| Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd. | 5.0 | I use froglogic Squish for GUI regression testing with Qt frameworks. It's seamless across Windows and Linux. Although it's strong in GUI testing, adding performance and penetration testing could enhance its value. A centralized dashboard is available for monitoring. |
| Quality Assurance Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees | 4.0 | No summary available |
| QA at a tech company with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | I use Froglogic Squish for desktop UI testing and appreciate its user-friendly interface and capability to test Qt applications. While I miss Git integration for collaboration, I expect the tool to be valuable and yield a return on investment. |
| Software Solutions Engineer at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd. | 5.0 | No summary available |
