Parasoft SOAtest vs Qt Squish comparison

Parasoft and Qt Group are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Parasoft is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.7, while Qt Group is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3. Parasoft holds a 1.3% mindshare in TAt, compared to Qt Group’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Qt Group users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

2,343 Views
562 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Qt Squish

Read 20 Qt Squish reviews

3,047 Views
2,468 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Qt Squish

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and Qt Squish compete in the software testing domain, each offering unique advantages. Parasoft SOAtest stands out for comprehensive testing solutions, while Qt Squish is noted for its versatile automation.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers extensive API testing, service virtualization, and event monitoring, making it suitable for complex environments. It supports a wide range of protocols such as JSON and provides robust reporting and integration options. Qt Squish is recognized for cross-platform GUI testing, integration with CI systems, and supports multiple scripting languages, providing flexibility and ease of use.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance its ease of use for beginners and provide more intuitive interfaces. It might also look at reducing complexity in setting up scenarios. Qt Squish could improve support for non-GUI applications and offer more comprehensive documentation. Faster execution times might also enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deployment for Parasoft SOAtest is noted for seamless integration into existing systems, backed by solid customer service. Qt Squish offers efficient deployment with ongoing updates and strong technical support, ensuring consistent performance and engagement.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest's higher initial cost reflects its advanced capabilities, promising a substantial ROI in complex environments. Qt Squish, while also representing a significant investment, is seen as cost-effective for its broad functionalities, offering a rapid ROI, especially advantageous for varied and adaptable testing requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. Qt Squish Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Qt Squish

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.7

Parasoft SOAtest enhances API testing efficiency and ROI with minimal coding, despite lacking a comprehensive metrics system.

Sentiment score

7.3

Qt Squish reduced manual testing time, enabled agile cycles, improved efficiency, and optimized processes with stable automation suites.

Tasks that previously took four or five minutes can now be completed in 20 to 30 seconds with the help of the tool.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

For the part that has been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.7

Customer service is excellent, with fast responses and effective problem resolution, despite challenges with complex issues and regional availability.

Sentiment score

6.9

Qt Squish's customer service is efficient and knowledgeable, with quick responses, but video support can be expensive.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.0

Parasoft SOAtest scales well with proper licensing, though larger tests and memory management need careful planning in CI/CD contexts.

Sentiment score

7.2

Qt Squish is praised for scalability, especially with floating licenses, but some face minor issues like image recognition glitches.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

With one license, just one user or one test scenario can be run at a time.

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.0

Parasoft SOAtest is generally stable, but memory consumption can cause occasional issues, especially with complex scenarios on low-end systems.

Sentiment score

8.0

Users report high stability with Qt Squish, experiencing minimal issues, which are quickly resolved by support and updates.

In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report

Room For Improvement

Parasoft SOAtest needs better reports, interface, performance, integration, automation, documentation, price, startup time, memory use, and user-friendliness.

Qt Squish needs improvements in object identification, testing stability, integration, and enhanced support for non-Qt applications while addressing pricing and speed issues.

It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.

Nghiêm Phương

CEO at SMOne

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

If you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java.

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers find Parasoft SOAtest expensive but worthwhile due to robust features and scalability, despite complex licensing.

Qt Squish receives mixed reviews for its pricing, with high costs and inflexible licensing compared to other tools.

Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report

Valuable Features

Parasoft SOAtest provides rapid functional testing setup, extensive API support, seamless integration, and comprehensive validation tools for scalable end-to-end testing.

Qt Squish is a versatile UI testing tool praised for cross-platform support, Python compatibility, and seamless CI integration.

The best feature of Parasoft SOAtest is the extension tool where we can write our custom scripts.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.

Nghiêm Phương

CEO at SMOne

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

For the parts that have been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th), Functional Testing Tools (16th), API Testing Tools (10th)

Qt Squish

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 1.3%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qt Squish is 3.0%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Qt Squish	3.0%
Parasoft SOAtest	1.3%
Other	95.7%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability

There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Manufacturing Company

22%

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?

I'm aware of the price from three or four years ago, and it depends on the number of users. For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?

I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the applicat...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 13% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 12% of the time

Coverity Static vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 7% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 6% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 15% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish

Compared 15% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish

Compared 9% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 7% of the time

More Qt Squish Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

January 2026

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish

January 2026

Download Qt Squish product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

froglogic Squish

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Qt Group

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Qt Squish

January 2026

Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. Qt Squish

Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Qt Squish and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. Qt Squish report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.