Parasoft SOAtest and Qt Squish compete in the software testing domain, each offering unique advantages. Parasoft SOAtest stands out for comprehensive testing solutions, while Qt Squish is noted for its versatile automation.
Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers extensive API testing, service virtualization, and event monitoring, making it suitable for complex environments. It supports a wide range of protocols such as JSON and provides robust reporting and integration options. Qt Squish is recognized for cross-platform GUI testing, integration with CI systems, and supports multiple scripting languages, providing flexibility and ease of use.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance its ease of use for beginners and provide more intuitive interfaces. It might also look at reducing complexity in setting up scenarios. Qt Squish could improve support for non-GUI applications and offer more comprehensive documentation. Faster execution times might also enhance user experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deployment for Parasoft SOAtest is noted for seamless integration into existing systems, backed by solid customer service. Qt Squish offers efficient deployment with ongoing updates and strong technical support, ensuring consistent performance and engagement.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest's higher initial cost reflects its advanced capabilities, promising a substantial ROI in complex environments. Qt Squish, while also representing a significant investment, is seen as cost-effective for its broad functionalities, offering a rapid ROI, especially advantageous for varied and adaptable testing requirements.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
For the part that has been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.
With one license, just one user or one test scenario can be run at a time.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.
If you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.
For the parts that have been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
