Perfecto vs Qt Squish comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Perforce and Qt Group are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Perforce is ranked #21, while Qt Group is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5. Perforce holds a 2.3% mindshare in TAt, compared to Qt Group’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Qt Group users who would recommend it.

Perfecto

Read 23 Perfecto reviews

5,605 Views
2,578 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Qt Squish

Read 20 Qt Squish reviews

4,643 Views
3,622 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Perfecto

Qt Squish

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Perfecto and Qt Squish are both products competing in the realm of testing automation solutions. Perfecto seems to have the upper hand in scalability and cross-platform testing, while Qt Squish excels in specialized desktop and embedded systems testing.

Features: Perfecto supports a comprehensive range of devices and browsers, providing teams with extensive automation capabilities and real-time analytics. It also boasts a strong cloud infrastructure for seamless cross-platform testing. Qt Squish, however, stands out for its in-depth cross-platform application support, especially in GUI testing for desktop and embedded applications. It offers powerful and reliable object identification and verifications, and integrates well with multiple development environments.

Room for Improvement: Perfecto could enhance its pricing model to offer better suitability for smaller niche markets and could refine its integration with less common testing frameworks. Moreover, improvements in the customization of its dashboards could provide more personalized analytics. Qt Squish could benefit from expanding its cloud capabilities and increasing its scalability options. Additionally, enhancements in support for modern web architectures and improvements in user interface intuitiveness could broaden its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Perfecto provides a robust cloud-based deployment model that requires minimal setup and offers excellent customer service. Its deployment tends to be quicker. On the other hand, Qt Squish offers customizable deployment options that are adaptable for both local and cloud-based needs, paired with dedicated support services. It provides greater flexibility in tailoring deployment strategies.

Pricing and ROI: Perfecto's pricing reflects its comprehensive cloud services and expansive features, offering competitive ROI for larger teams needing extensive coverage. Qt Squish presents a more tailored pricing approach, potentially offering higher ROI for organizations focusing on specific desktop and embedded systems testing. The primary distinction lies in Perfecto's broad-spectrum pricing model, contrasting with Qt Squish's framework-specific cost efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Perfecto vs. Qt Squish Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto vs. Qt Squish

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Perfecto

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

21st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (13th), Functional Testing Tools (20th), Mobile App Testing Tools (6th)

Qt Squish

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Perfecto is 2.3%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qt Squish is 2.2%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qt Squish	2.2%
Perfecto	2.3%
Other	95.5%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Rodrigo Candido Costa

Software Quality and Automation Specialist at PRIME CONTROL

The solution saves us money because the cost of each license is 10 times lower than what we would spend to maintain infrastructure here

Sometimes, when the automated tests sync up or we have to debug remotely, we cannot interact directly with the device. We can interact with the code in the debugging tool, but we cannot directly click on the element on the screen or send other kinds of inputs to the device. This is possible with other tools. Also, it would be nice if there were some kind of API to get a list of available devices. Currently, we have to look at the web interface to see the available devices, but the pipelines can't do it on their own there. We always need to do this manually, so it would be better if this feature was automated.

Read full review

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability

There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The automation piece is the most valuable feature. Every time we had a new version of either OS or an application, we found that being able to automate the testing across different devices is very valuable."

"It has saved hours of manual testing time, costs and efforts."

"When the scripts are stable, Perfecto is awesome."

"The automated test reporting functionality is the most valuable feature. We use the CI Dashboard. It's very important as it is the main reporting tool for our automated tests."

"Being able to run automated tests and see the success and failure rate of those runs every day has saved us a lot of time and helped us identify issues much sooner, which has improved the quality of our software."

"It saves on the cost and effort of having to maintain our own virtual testing environment. Even our onshore team is not in the city that we work in, so that helps a lot. Even if we didn't invest a lot in getting multiple devices, having to share those devices would become a hassle."

"One of the good things about Perfecto is the scalability that it provides, as we are able to quickly scale up the devices and choose Android devices, web-based applications, or whatever we need, and we can scale up quickly and easily."

"One of the good things about Perfecto is the scalability that it provides."

More Perfecto pros

"Squish saved our time and money by creating reusable operating system independent test scripts."

"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."

"Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively."

"It is very stable."

"Stable automation framework with its own object library enabled us to move all of the tests to a Continuous Integration farm."

"Powerful and intuitive Integrated Development Environment (IDE) - I use this IDE daily for creating new tests, debugging tests and running tests."

"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them, both on Windows OS and on Mac, as well as on mobile operating systems like iOS and Android too."

"The biggest ROI is the time that we got back from our QA team because they didn’t have to manually regression test our product every release."

More Qt Squish pros

Cons

"Previously, we used the cradle. Every time the mobile was blocking it, we would have to ask Perfecto to provide another one. That took a lot of time away from us."

"Its performance should be improved. Anything to speed up the user interface would be a great help. We've had a lot of pain with their migration from a product UI that was based on Adobe Flash to the new product that is based on HTML5. Migrations like that seemed to be very painful and not a real smooth process. We're still sort of recovering from that migration from old technology to new, and we haven't got all the functionality ported over that we used to have on the old UI."

"It would be ideal if there was a complete integration with other test management tools and other applications like HPLM, Micro Focus, or Microsoft Azure."

"We have had some issues with performance, which is something that should be improved."

"There could be some improvements done on the interface. At times, there has been a bit of a struggle when finding things on the interface. A UI revamp would be a better option in future. That UI hasn't changed much in a long time, so I think they could just make it a bit better so that people could find stuff easily and intuitively."

"It does well for mobile testing, but when it comes to the web aspect, it is lagging a little bit in terms of execution."

"We feel that Perfecto is a little slow. If they could improve on that slowness in accessing the app, when we want to click a button, that would be great because we feel the difference. An improvement in the connectivity speed is required."

"So, overall, I would rate Perfecto a seven out of ten because sometimes, we also have lagging with some of the devices. We get error messages, but we're not quite sure what's causing them."

More Perfecto cons

"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."

"Robotics automation could be added with Squish."

"The most complete way of testing is on several OS's, even platforms. Here, the solution provided by Squish, through several Python script files, could be simplified in such a way, so that even black box testers could manage it easily."

"Features like recovery scenarios can be added as an improvement Reporting can be improved."

"Recording tests with Squish IDE creates quite ugly code and it is very difficult to maintain tests that have been recorded."

"The price could be better."

"Sometimes, I had problems, but their support team resolved almost of them in short time."

More Qt Squish cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is an area where Perfecto can do a little better. When we obtain additional licenses, we enter into negotiations with them."

"This is an expensive solution compared to others, by 30% to 40%."

"It's definitely on the higher end of prices for this type of service."

"Pricing-wise, it is fine. It is not as expensive as what we used to have in the past from HP, IBM, and others. It is decently priced."

"Perfecto is about 30-40% cheaper than Device Anywhere. That was a big reason why we switched. Perfecto also solves some of the issues that we had with Device Anywhere. We have grown by 100% since we started to use Perfecto, and now we have devices roaming. When we look at the competition, we would still stick with Perfecto."

"Perfecto's price is excellent compared to other products with similar features. It was the lowest of the three we evaluated. We also established a partnership with Perfecto, so they provide discounts when we sell Perfecto projects and licenses to our customers."

"Perfecto has definitely saved us on the costs and efforts of having to maintain our own virtual test environment. We lost about 20 devices in the past to maintenance and audit. That was a massive loss for us, as a company, because we were giving devices to someone, but don't know whether we would get it back or not. Having those virtual labs, we don't need to worry about these kinds of things. We are easily saving $5,000 to $10,000 a month on device costing."

"I am not sure about its pricing, but from our perspective, licensing has been easy. Anytime I have new users or requests for users that want to get added, it's a very simple process. I just give the architectural owner of the product the name and email address, and they're able to easily add a new user. We don't have any issues in regards to getting licenses, but I don't have any insights into pricing."

More Perfecto pricing and cost advice

"The platform is highly-priced."

"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

"It is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

20%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?

I'm aware of the price from three or four years ago, and it depends on the number of users. For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?

I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the applicat...

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs Perfecto

Compared 8% of the time

Sauce Labs vs Perfecto

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Perfecto

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Perfecto

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Perfecto

Compared 5% of the time

More Perfecto Competitors

Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish

Compared 7% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish

Compared 6% of the time

Appium vs Qt Squish

Compared 5% of the time

More Qt Squish Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto

September 2026

Download Perfecto product report

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish

September 2026

Download Qt Squish product report

Also Known As

Perfecto Mobile, Perfecto Web

froglogic Squish

Overview

Perfecto is a cloud-based testing platform that supports automated and manual testing processes across many devices and operating systems, facilitating cross-platform and real-time data access. Users experience seamless testing integrations, although improvements are sought in some areas.

Perfecto provides extensive mobile testing capabilities across iOS, Android, and more, with automation and enhanced reporting options such as video recordings. While it excels with Appium and Selenium integration for cross-platform consistency and CI Dashboard features, it faces challenges in iOS web testing and hybrid apps. Users indicate the need for better integration with test management tools, dashboard metrics improvements, and machine learning features. Cloud device response times and UI interactions could benefit from performance enhancements, while users desire longer report history and API automation advancements.

What are Perfecto's most important features?

Cloud-based Architecture: Access a vast array of devices and OS versions for testing scalability.
Automation: Supports Selenium and Appium for streamlined testing processes.
Enhanced Reporting: Offers video recordings to help validate tests thoroughly.
Cross-platform Testing: Execute tests across multiple platforms efficiently.
Real-time Data Access: Monitor tests via CI Dashboard and Live Stream.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from reviews?

Increased Device Availability: Quickly access the newest devices and software updates.
Improved Testing Speed: Allow faster test execution and feedback loops.
Scalability: Easily scale up or down with cloud-based resources.
Enhanced Productivity: Automate tests and streamline reporting for efficiency.

Perfecto has broad applications in industries such as retail, finance, and technology, where secure and scalable testing is critical. Organizations employ it in both private and public cloud environments for mobile, web, and API testing. Its ability to provide extensive device coverage and integration into existing CI/CD processes makes it integral for ensuring reliable mobile app performance and compatibility across platforms.

Perforce

Qt Squish is a versatile testing tool that supports Python, integrates with Rational Quality Manager, and handles multiple toolkits. It efficiently boosts code quality with features like auto-completion and a comprehensive dashboard while supporting diverse languages and providing strong documentation.

Qt Squish is known for its robust capability in automatic testing, particularly in GUI and regression testing applications across real-time control, embedded systems, and hybrid frameworks. The tool enables behavior-driven development with Gherkin Syntax, integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, and facilitates effective data-driven and distributed batch testing. Users gain significant value from its compatibility with Qt applications, multiple platforms, extensive language support, and integration with other development tools. Although there are suggestions for improving reporting, configuration for less technical users, Git integration, and object identification, Qt Squish still stands out for its exceptional capability in mapping UI components and supporting automated UI testing.

What are the important features of Qt Squish?

Python Compatibility: Facilitates Python scripting and automation.
Rational Quality Manager Integration: Enhances test management.
Multi-Toolkit Support: Provides flexibility across toolkits.
Auto-Completion: Boosts coding productivity.
Accurate UI Mapping: Essential for precise component identification.
CI System Integration: Simplifies integration into CI workflows.
Behavior-Driven Development: Supports Gherkin Syntax for BDD.
Extensive Language Support: Enables testing in diverse scripting languages.

What benefits should reviews highlight?

Remote Testing: Facilitates testing geographically distributed systems.
Data-Driven Testing: Leverages extensive data sources for testing.
Robust Documentation: Provides comprehensive user guidance.
Intuitive IDE: Streamlines the development and testing workflow.

Industries such as real-time traffic control, embedded systems, and hybrid applications frequently use Qt Squish for automated testing. The ability to integrate with CI/CD pipelines and compatibility with multiple scripting languages makes it an ideal solution for organizations focusing on GUI and regression testing. Companies benefit from its seamless integration with diverse data sources and development tools, enabling efficient automated UI testing across all relevant platforms.

Qt Group

Sample Customers

Virgin Media, Paychex, Rabobank, R+V, Discover

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto vs. Qt Squish

September 2026

Free Report: Perfecto vs. Qt Squish

Find out what your peers are saying about Perfecto vs. Qt Squish and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Perfecto vs. Qt Squish report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.