Perfecto vs Qt Squish comparison

Perforce and Qt Group are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Perforce is ranked #19, while Qt Group is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3. Perforce holds a 2.3% mindshare in TAt, compared to Qt Group’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Qt Group users who would recommend it.

Perfecto

Read 23 Perfecto reviews

4,386 Views
1,974 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Qt Squish

Read 20 Qt Squish reviews

3,890 Views
3,112 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Perfecto

Qt Squish

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Perfecto and Qt Squish are both products competing in the realm of testing automation solutions. Perfecto seems to have the upper hand in scalability and cross-platform testing, while Qt Squish excels in specialized desktop and embedded systems testing.

Features: Perfecto supports a comprehensive range of devices and browsers, providing teams with extensive automation capabilities and real-time analytics. It also boasts a strong cloud infrastructure for seamless cross-platform testing. Qt Squish, however, stands out for its in-depth cross-platform application support, especially in GUI testing for desktop and embedded applications. It offers powerful and reliable object identification and verifications, and integrates well with multiple development environments.

Room for Improvement: Perfecto could enhance its pricing model to offer better suitability for smaller niche markets and could refine its integration with less common testing frameworks. Moreover, improvements in the customization of its dashboards could provide more personalized analytics. Qt Squish could benefit from expanding its cloud capabilities and increasing its scalability options. Additionally, enhancements in support for modern web architectures and improvements in user interface intuitiveness could broaden its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Perfecto provides a robust cloud-based deployment model that requires minimal setup and offers excellent customer service. Its deployment tends to be quicker. On the other hand, Qt Squish offers customizable deployment options that are adaptable for both local and cloud-based needs, paired with dedicated support services. It provides greater flexibility in tailoring deployment strategies.

Pricing and ROI: Perfecto's pricing reflects its comprehensive cloud services and expansive features, offering competitive ROI for larger teams needing extensive coverage. Qt Squish presents a more tailored pricing approach, potentially offering higher ROI for organizations focusing on specific desktop and embedded systems testing. The primary distinction lies in Perfecto's broad-spectrum pricing model, contrasting with Qt Squish's framework-specific cost efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Perfecto vs. Qt Squish Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto vs. Qt Squish

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Perfecto

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (14th), Functional Testing Tools (16th), Mobile App Testing Tools (5th)

Qt Squish

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Perfecto is 2.3%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qt Squish is 2.5%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qt Squish	2.5%
Perfecto	2.3%
Other	95.2%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Glenford John

Product Manager, Device Integration at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Saves us $2.6 million per year, provides more efficient testing, and helps us strengthen relationships with vendors

The automation piece is the most valuable feature. Every time we had a new version of either OS or an application, we found that being able to automate the testing across different devices is very valuable. Perfecto is great at executing cross-platform testing. From a carrier perspective, it's all mobile, but we also have web applications. We used to be able to test on Symbian, Windows OS, Android, and iOS. Today, we can go on a big screen and test on Chrome, Firefox, Explorer, and other browsers. My team leverages Perfecto's reporting and analytics. When we start stress testing an application, we can look at all the reporting that comes from that, and we can tell at what part of the day the app is performing better. Our analytics are very important to us. Presentations are important, so it's good to have reports with graphs that show the time of day or how the app was performing for months at a time. We use those reports to screen capture, go with the data, and to show to upper management. We can do a comparison of one version performance to another version of the application or device performance. We utilize Perfecto's cloud-based lab to test across devices, browsers, and OSs. We are a carrier, so we have our devices with different OS versions of devices. Right now, it's mostly just Apple and Androids. Back in the day, they had many different versions of the OS, but the only other thing on top of that is web-based browsers. We don't test Linux, which is an operating system of Windows. We don't use Perfecto's cloud. We use our own devices because we test on only our organization's devices. Unless we do some kind of competitive analysis, it's not really a test; it's just a comparison to see how other solutions compare to ours. The range of open-source technologies that Perfecto supports is great. I have a team of contractors that report to me and do all the testing for our organization, and that team turns over every couple of years. We mostly utilize the in-house automation that is available for anyone who isn't a great programmer. They have support for all these other drivers, and they have something for non-programmers who want to automate their work, which is amazing.

Read full review

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability

There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I also like the reporting functions. We are constantly downloading these reports and sharing them with our final customers. They help us understand what kind of bugs are happening through the applications. The recording feature is handy because it lets us see a video of the process we run through the pipeline and discover the point at which the automation is breaking."

"The CI dashboard tool is very good, as is the Live Stream monitoring. Whenever I want to monitor execution, I can open multiple tabs in Perfecto and it is easy for me to refer to the CI dashboard and the Live Stream."

"Customer Service: It's been 100%. Technical Support: It's been 100%."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is that it covers all types of devices on the market allowing you to test different versions of an operating system."

"In terms of cross-platform testing, they offer all of it, every device available in the market. It covers real scenarios that mimic production so that we don't miss out on any devices that our clients might be using to run the applications we develop. It's been great and very helpful."

"Perfecto has affected our software quality in a good way; it has allowed us to catch our defects earlier, thus improving the quality of our applications."

"The automated test reporting functionality is the most valuable feature. We use the CI Dashboard. It's very important as it is the main reporting tool for our automated tests."

"Perfecto has definitely saved us on the costs and efforts of having to maintain our own virtual test environment."

More Perfecto pros

"Now we have completely automated the Squish runs using CI tools and Squish is not at all getting stuck or creating any problem."

"Stable automation framework with its own object library enabled us to move all of the tests to a Continuous Integration farm."

"The most important part is that it allows me to create black box tests faster and easier."

"Powerful and intuitive Integrated Development Environment (IDE) - I use this IDE daily for creating new tests, debugging tests and running tests."

"It supports many platforms, which helps in getting automation solutions for most of the complex UI products."

"Squish data-driven testing is very powerful and we can easily check for bulk and huge data without any issues."

"Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

More Qt Squish pros

Cons

"It would be nice if there were some kind of AI to compile a list of available devices. Currently, we have to look at the web interface to see the available devices, but the pipelines can't do it on their own there. We always need to do this manually, so it would be better if this feature were automated."

"I'm hoping that Perfecto will come up with browser testing as well because it would be easier to access it."

"Its performance should be improved. Anything to speed up the user interface would be a great help. We've had a lot of pain with their migration from a product UI that was based on Adobe Flash to the new product that is based on HTML5. Migrations like that seemed to be very painful and not a real smooth process. We're still sort of recovering from that migration from old technology to new, and we haven't got all the functionality ported over that we used to have on the old UI."

"It does well for mobile testing, but when it comes to the web aspect, it is lagging a little bit in terms of execution."

"In iOS, it needs improvements with some limitations."

"So, overall, I would rate Perfecto a seven out of ten because sometimes, we also have lagging with some of the devices. We get error messages, but we're not quite sure what's causing them."

"We have had some issues with performance, which is something that should be improved."

"I'm hoping that Perfecto will come up with browser testing as well because it would be easier to access it."

More Perfecto cons

"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

"Anyhow, we can't automate the applications which are completely built on C/C++ without using Qt."

"As things stand, continuous integration is very poor, and when you work in production you need many more settings in order to tune it, to be a Web user interface, for example, which is currently impossible."

"The price could be better."

"We have faced some difficulties in identifying canvas objects initially."

"It still requires better solutions for object identification and an enhancement to identify all the objects of the AUT before building the object map."

"The only criticism I have is the IDE needed a bit of polish in version 5.2 (this may have been fixed in the latest versions)."

"Squish is lagging in handling swing objects, but I believe Squish will overcome this shortly."

More Qt Squish cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am not sure about its pricing, but from our perspective, licensing has been easy. Anytime I have new users or requests for users that want to get added, it's a very simple process. I just give the architectural owner of the product the name and email address, and they're able to easily add a new user. We don't have any issues in regards to getting licenses, but I don't have any insights into pricing."

"This is an expensive solution compared to others, by 30% to 40%."

"It's definitely on the higher end of prices for this type of service."

"Perfecto has definitely saved us on the costs and efforts of having to maintain our own virtual test environment. We lost about 20 devices in the past to maintenance and audit. That was a massive loss for us, as a company, because we were giving devices to someone, but don't know whether we would get it back or not. Having those virtual labs, we don't need to worry about these kinds of things. We are easily saving $5,000 to $10,000 a month on device costing."

"Perfecto is about 30-40% cheaper than Device Anywhere. That was a big reason why we switched. Perfecto also solves some of the issues that we had with Device Anywhere. We have grown by 100% since we started to use Perfecto, and now we have devices roaming. When we look at the competition, we would still stick with Perfecto."

"Although Perfecto is a good product for us to use, it is a bit expensive. It takes management a bit of work to find the appropriate funding for us to keep Perfecto. I imagine there could be some way to make it more accessible."

"Pricing is an area where Perfecto can do a little better. When we obtain additional licenses, we enter into negotiations with them."

"Pricing-wise, it is fine. It is not as expensive as what we used to have in the past from HP, IBM, and others. It is decently priced."

More Perfecto pricing and cost advice

"It is expensive."

"The platform is highly-priced."

"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

21%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?

I'm aware of the price from three or four years ago, and it depends on the number of users. For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?

I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the applicat...

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs Perfecto

Compared 13% of the time

Sauce Labs vs Perfecto

Compared 10% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs Perfecto

Compared 5% of the time

Appium vs Perfecto

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Perfecto

Compared 4% of the time

More Perfecto Competitors

Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish

Compared 10% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish

Compared 7% of the time

Appium vs Qt Squish

Compared 5% of the time

More Qt Squish Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto

April 2026

Download Perfecto product report

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish

April 2026

Download Qt Squish product report

Also Known As

Perfecto Mobile, Perfecto Web

froglogic Squish

Overview

Perfecto is a cloud-based testing platform that supports automated and manual testing processes across many devices and operating systems, facilitating cross-platform and real-time data access. Users experience seamless testing integrations, although improvements are sought in some areas.

Perfecto provides extensive mobile testing capabilities across iOS, Android, and more, with automation and enhanced reporting options such as video recordings. While it excels with Appium and Selenium integration for cross-platform consistency and CI Dashboard features, it faces challenges in iOS web testing and hybrid apps. Users indicate the need for better integration with test management tools, dashboard metrics improvements, and machine learning features. Cloud device response times and UI interactions could benefit from performance enhancements, while users desire longer report history and API automation advancements.

What are Perfecto's most important features?

Cloud-based Architecture: Access a vast array of devices and OS versions for testing scalability.
Automation: Supports Selenium and Appium for streamlined testing processes.
Enhanced Reporting: Offers video recordings to help validate tests thoroughly.
Cross-platform Testing: Execute tests across multiple platforms efficiently.
Real-time Data Access: Monitor tests via CI Dashboard and Live Stream.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from reviews?

Increased Device Availability: Quickly access the newest devices and software updates.
Improved Testing Speed: Allow faster test execution and feedback loops.
Scalability: Easily scale up or down with cloud-based resources.
Enhanced Productivity: Automate tests and streamline reporting for efficiency.

Perfecto has broad applications in industries such as retail, finance, and technology, where secure and scalable testing is critical. Organizations employ it in both private and public cloud environments for mobile, web, and API testing. Its ability to provide extensive device coverage and integration into existing CI/CD processes makes it integral for ensuring reliable mobile app performance and compatibility across platforms.

Perforce

Qt Squish is a versatile testing tool that supports Python, integrates with Rational Quality Manager, and handles multiple toolkits. It efficiently boosts code quality with features like auto-completion and a comprehensive dashboard while supporting diverse languages and providing strong documentation.

Qt Squish is known for its robust capability in automatic testing, particularly in GUI and regression testing applications across real-time control, embedded systems, and hybrid frameworks. The tool enables behavior-driven development with Gherkin Syntax, integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, and facilitates effective data-driven and distributed batch testing. Users gain significant value from its compatibility with Qt applications, multiple platforms, extensive language support, and integration with other development tools. Although there are suggestions for improving reporting, configuration for less technical users, Git integration, and object identification, Qt Squish still stands out for its exceptional capability in mapping UI components and supporting automated UI testing.

What are the important features of Qt Squish?

Python Compatibility: Facilitates Python scripting and automation.
Rational Quality Manager Integration: Enhances test management.
Multi-Toolkit Support: Provides flexibility across toolkits.
Auto-Completion: Boosts coding productivity.
Accurate UI Mapping: Essential for precise component identification.
CI System Integration: Simplifies integration into CI workflows.
Behavior-Driven Development: Supports Gherkin Syntax for BDD.
Extensive Language Support: Enables testing in diverse scripting languages.

What benefits should reviews highlight?

Remote Testing: Facilitates testing geographically distributed systems.
Data-Driven Testing: Leverages extensive data sources for testing.
Robust Documentation: Provides comprehensive user guidance.
Intuitive IDE: Streamlines the development and testing workflow.

Industries such as real-time traffic control, embedded systems, and hybrid applications frequently use Qt Squish for automated testing. The ability to integrate with CI/CD pipelines and compatibility with multiple scripting languages makes it an ideal solution for organizations focusing on GUI and regression testing. Companies benefit from its seamless integration with diverse data sources and development tools, enabling efficient automated UI testing across all relevant platforms.

Qt Group

Sample Customers

Virgin Media, Paychex, Rabobank, R+V, Discover

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto vs. Qt Squish

April 2026

Free Report: Perfecto vs. Qt Squish

Find out what your peers are saying about Perfecto vs. Qt Squish and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Perfecto vs. Qt Squish report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.