Perfecto vs Qt Squish comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Perforce and Qt Group are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Perforce is ranked #21, while Qt Group is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. Perforce holds a 2.3% mindshare in TAt, compared to Qt Group’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Qt Group users who would recommend it.

Perfecto

Read 23 Perfecto reviews

6,166 Views
2,836 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Qt Squish

Read 20 Qt Squish reviews

5,003 Views
3,852 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Perfecto

Qt Squish

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Perfecto and Qt Squish are both products competing in the realm of testing automation solutions. Perfecto seems to have the upper hand in scalability and cross-platform testing, while Qt Squish excels in specialized desktop and embedded systems testing.

Features: Perfecto supports a comprehensive range of devices and browsers, providing teams with extensive automation capabilities and real-time analytics. It also boasts a strong cloud infrastructure for seamless cross-platform testing. Qt Squish, however, stands out for its in-depth cross-platform application support, especially in GUI testing for desktop and embedded applications. It offers powerful and reliable object identification and verifications, and integrates well with multiple development environments.

Room for Improvement: Perfecto could enhance its pricing model to offer better suitability for smaller niche markets and could refine its integration with less common testing frameworks. Moreover, improvements in the customization of its dashboards could provide more personalized analytics. Qt Squish could benefit from expanding its cloud capabilities and increasing its scalability options. Additionally, enhancements in support for modern web architectures and improvements in user interface intuitiveness could broaden its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Perfecto provides a robust cloud-based deployment model that requires minimal setup and offers excellent customer service. Its deployment tends to be quicker. On the other hand, Qt Squish offers customizable deployment options that are adaptable for both local and cloud-based needs, paired with dedicated support services. It provides greater flexibility in tailoring deployment strategies.

Pricing and ROI: Perfecto's pricing reflects its comprehensive cloud services and expansive features, offering competitive ROI for larger teams needing extensive coverage. Qt Squish presents a more tailored pricing approach, potentially offering higher ROI for organizations focusing on specific desktop and embedded systems testing. The primary distinction lies in Perfecto's broad-spectrum pricing model, contrasting with Qt Squish's framework-specific cost efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Perfecto vs. Qt Squish Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto vs. Qt Squish

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Perfecto

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

21st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (12th), Functional Testing Tools (19th), Mobile App Testing Tools (5th)

Qt Squish

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Perfecto is 2.3%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qt Squish is 2.2%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qt Squish	2.2%
Perfecto	2.3%
Other	95.5%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1963857

Head of Quality at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

The network testing can be accessed from anywhere in the world, but the UI needs revamping

Recently, the network testing component where we can use Perfecto on devices has been the most valuable feature. There is very little competition out there in this regard. We use it for 4G and 5G testing of launched 5G and 4G brands. So, the network testing can be accessed from anywhere in the world. That is very valuable for us. Perfecto is very good when it comes to executing cross-platform testing. We have just gotten started on cross-browser testing. We already use Perfecto for the native-application testing on multiple devices. I think now we also use Perfecto for browser-related testing. So, all the cross-browser testing works well. We got a couple of licenses that we use. We can mostly see usage over time using the device logs. This is what matters the most to us, e.g., what team is using a device for how long. We use Cypress, and it supports it quite well. We use APM, and it also supports that quite well. We used to use the native quantum framework as well in the past, which was obviously well-supported, but now we have moved onto Cypress and APM. Also, we have Applitools, which is not open source, but a paid proprietary tool.

Read full review

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability

There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are continuously doing testing on different environments, devices, and platforms. It executes seamlessly on multiple devices without having any connectivity issues. It has been really helpful for us to test on cloud devices."

"Their team is really great to work with. They're very flexible, and they always show care. They prioritize our work, our company, and our working relationship. I appreciate the ad hoc sessions that they schedule to provide help with troubleshooting, provide the information that we're looking for, or do a demo of a new feature that they have. They're always willing and very quick to get that scheduled for us. I appreciate that a lot."

"We are able to offer a quality product that has been tested fully, which improves our customer satisfaction. That is a good thing. It has also reduced our IT infrastructure cost. We don't have to spend a lot on setting up infrastructure, which becomes redundant or obsolete very soon. It helps in offsetting that cost."

"One of the good things about Perfecto is the scalability that it provides."

"There are a whole bunch of things that I like about the solution, but I really love the interaction it has with mobile devices, the testing capabilities, as well as reporting capabilities that we get from the application. The reports are very detailed."

"Perfecto is part of our testing life; when we test, we do it in Perfecto, and without it, our team would not be able to perform testing on mobile devices."

"I also like the reporting functions. We are constantly downloading these reports and sharing them with our final customers. They help us understand what kind of bugs are happening through the applications. The recording feature is handy because it lets us see a video of the process we run through the pipeline and discover the point at which the automation is breaking."

"It has saved hours of manual testing time, costs and efforts."

More Perfecto pros

"The biggest ROI is the time that we got back from our QA team because they didn’t have to manually regression test our product every release."

"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."

"Now we have completely automated the Squish runs using CI tools and Squish is not at all getting stuck or creating any problem."

"Squish data-driven testing is very powerful and we can easily check for bulk and huge data without any issues."

"The most important part is that it allows me to create black box tests faster and easier."

"Powerful and intuitive Integrated Development Environment (IDE) - I use this IDE daily for creating new tests, debugging tests and running tests."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."

More Qt Squish pros

Cons

"The monitoring features, in particular network traffic monitoring, could be improved."

"So, overall, I would rate Perfecto a seven out of ten because sometimes, we also have lagging with some of the devices. We get error messages, but we're not quite sure what's causing them."

"We have had some issues with performance, which is something that should be improved."

"One improvement would be speed of execution. If it is an iOS native app, we have noticed that the speed is a bit slower. Perfecto might need to make some improvements in this area."

"On the analytics side, Perfecto is in need of improvement."

"Previously, we used the cradle. Every time the mobile was blocking it, we would have to ask Perfecto to provide another one. That took a lot of time away from us."

"If we could run an accessibility test in Perfecto against builds, it would help us a lot. Currently, that's a very manual process for us. We haven't found a tool that can do accessibility scans for iOS and doesn't depend on engineering effort. Having a feature related to that would be really awesome for us."

"When using devices on the cloud, it lags quite a bit at times."

More Perfecto cons

"I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved."

"It would make the work of the Squish user easier and quicker if Squish would display the proper feature names, when assigned."

"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."

"It still requires better solutions for object identification and an enhancement to identify all the objects of the AUT before building the object map."

"We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."

"Anyhow, we can't automate the applications which are completely built on C/C++ without using Qt."

"Features like recovery scenarios can be added as an improvement Reporting can be improved."

"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."

More Qt Squish cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Perfecto's price is excellent compared to other products with similar features. It was the lowest of the three we evaluated. We also established a partnership with Perfecto, so they provide discounts when we sell Perfecto projects and licenses to our customers."

"Pricing-wise, it is fine. It is not as expensive as what we used to have in the past from HP, IBM, and others. It is decently priced."

"I am not sure about its pricing, but from our perspective, licensing has been easy. Anytime I have new users or requests for users that want to get added, it's a very simple process. I just give the architectural owner of the product the name and email address, and they're able to easily add a new user. We don't have any issues in regards to getting licenses, but I don't have any insights into pricing."

"Perfecto is about 30-40% cheaper than Device Anywhere. That was a big reason why we switched. Perfecto also solves some of the issues that we had with Device Anywhere. We have grown by 100% since we started to use Perfecto, and now we have devices roaming. When we look at the competition, we would still stick with Perfecto."

"Pricing is an area where Perfecto can do a little better. When we obtain additional licenses, we enter into negotiations with them."

"Perfecto has definitely saved us on the costs and efforts of having to maintain our own virtual test environment. We lost about 20 devices in the past to maintenance and audit. That was a massive loss for us, as a company, because we were giving devices to someone, but don't know whether we would get it back or not. Having those virtual labs, we don't need to worry about these kinds of things. We are easily saving $5,000 to $10,000 a month on device costing."

"It's definitely on the higher end of prices for this type of service."

"Although Perfecto is a good product for us to use, it is a bit expensive. It takes management a bit of work to find the appropriate funding for us to keep Perfecto. I imagine there could be some way to make it more accessible."

More Perfecto pricing and cost advice

"The platform is highly-priced."

"It is expensive."

"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

19%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?

I'm aware of the price from three or four years ago, and it depends on the number of users. For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?

I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the applicat...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs Perfecto

Compared 8% of the time

BrowserStack vs Perfecto

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Perfecto

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Perfecto

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Perfecto

Compared 5% of the time

More Perfecto Competitors

Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish

Compared 7% of the time

Appium vs Qt Squish

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Qt Squish

Compared 5% of the time

More Qt Squish Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto

October 2026

Download Perfecto product report

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish

October 2026

Download Qt Squish product report

Also Known As

Perfecto Mobile, Perfecto Web

froglogic Squish

Overview

Perfecto is a cloud-based testing platform that supports automated and manual testing processes across many devices and operating systems, facilitating cross-platform and real-time data access. Users experience seamless testing integrations, although improvements are sought in some areas.

Perfecto provides extensive mobile testing capabilities across iOS, Android, and more, with automation and enhanced reporting options such as video recordings. While it excels with Appium and Selenium integration for cross-platform consistency and CI Dashboard features, it faces challenges in iOS web testing and hybrid apps. Users indicate the need for better integration with test management tools, dashboard metrics improvements, and machine learning features. Cloud device response times and UI interactions could benefit from performance enhancements, while users desire longer report history and API automation advancements.

What are Perfecto's most important features?

Cloud-based Architecture: Access a vast array of devices and OS versions for testing scalability.
Automation: Supports Selenium and Appium for streamlined testing processes.
Enhanced Reporting: Offers video recordings to help validate tests thoroughly.
Cross-platform Testing: Execute tests across multiple platforms efficiently.
Real-time Data Access: Monitor tests via CI Dashboard and Live Stream.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from reviews?

Increased Device Availability: Quickly access the newest devices and software updates.
Improved Testing Speed: Allow faster test execution and feedback loops.
Scalability: Easily scale up or down with cloud-based resources.
Enhanced Productivity: Automate tests and streamline reporting for efficiency.

Perfecto has broad applications in industries such as retail, finance, and technology, where secure and scalable testing is critical. Organizations employ it in both private and public cloud environments for mobile, web, and API testing. Its ability to provide extensive device coverage and integration into existing CI/CD processes makes it integral for ensuring reliable mobile app performance and compatibility across platforms.

Perforce

Qt Squish is a versatile testing tool that supports Python, integrates with Rational Quality Manager, and handles multiple toolkits. It efficiently boosts code quality with features like auto-completion and a comprehensive dashboard while supporting diverse languages and providing strong documentation.

Qt Squish is known for its robust capability in automatic testing, particularly in GUI and regression testing applications across real-time control, embedded systems, and hybrid frameworks. The tool enables behavior-driven development with Gherkin Syntax, integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, and facilitates effective data-driven and distributed batch testing. Users gain significant value from its compatibility with Qt applications, multiple platforms, extensive language support, and integration with other development tools. Although there are suggestions for improving reporting, configuration for less technical users, Git integration, and object identification, Qt Squish still stands out for its exceptional capability in mapping UI components and supporting automated UI testing.

What are the important features of Qt Squish?

Python Compatibility: Facilitates Python scripting and automation.
Rational Quality Manager Integration: Enhances test management.
Multi-Toolkit Support: Provides flexibility across toolkits.
Auto-Completion: Boosts coding productivity.
Accurate UI Mapping: Essential for precise component identification.
CI System Integration: Simplifies integration into CI workflows.
Behavior-Driven Development: Supports Gherkin Syntax for BDD.
Extensive Language Support: Enables testing in diverse scripting languages.

What benefits should reviews highlight?

Remote Testing: Facilitates testing geographically distributed systems.
Data-Driven Testing: Leverages extensive data sources for testing.
Robust Documentation: Provides comprehensive user guidance.
Intuitive IDE: Streamlines the development and testing workflow.

Industries such as real-time traffic control, embedded systems, and hybrid applications frequently use Qt Squish for automated testing. The ability to integrate with CI/CD pipelines and compatibility with multiple scripting languages makes it an ideal solution for organizations focusing on GUI and regression testing. Companies benefit from its seamless integration with diverse data sources and development tools, enabling efficient automated UI testing across all relevant platforms.

Qt Group

Sample Customers

Virgin Media, Paychex, Rabobank, R+V, Discover

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto vs. Qt Squish

September 2026

Free Report: Perfecto vs. Qt Squish

Find out what your peers are saying about Perfecto vs. Qt Squish and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Perfecto vs. Qt Squish report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.