Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Oracle BPM Logo

Top 10 Oracle BPM Alternatives

Vendor: Oracle
3.7 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Oracle BPM Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Oracle BPM based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), Camunda, and Appian. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Oracle BPM surpasses its competitors by offering a comprehensive suite of tools for process modeling, execution, and monitoring. Its seamless integration capabilities and user-friendly interface enhance operational efficiency and accelerate digital transformation initiatives.

Oracle Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Oracle, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Oracle BPM Logo
Oracle BPM Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)
4.0 out of 5
Informatica IDMC excels in data management with flexible architecture and robust data quality integration. In comparison, Oracle BPM offers strong process modeling with BPMN 2.0 support. Informatica provides versatile cloud deployment, while Oracle caters to process optimization with efficient on-premises solutions.
Download Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Oracle BPM Report
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) setup cost is higher due to its robust features, while Oracle BPM offers a more economical setup, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) setup cost is higher due to its robust features, while Oracle BPM offers a more economical setup, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
Oracle BPM Logo
Camunda
4.1 out of 5
Oracle BPM Logo
Camunda
4.1 out of 5
Oracle BPM offers robust features, excelling in process modeling and metrics reporting, ideal for businesses needing comprehensive integration. In comparison, Camunda's open-source nature and flexibility make it attractive for those seeking cost-effective solutions with BPMN support and extensibility across various environments.
Download Camunda vs. Oracle BPM Report
Oracle BPM has a higher setup cost while Camunda is more budget-friendly, making Camunda a more attractive option for startups.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle BPM has a higher setup cost while Camunda is more budget-friendly, making Camunda a more attractive option for startups.
Oracle BPM Logo
Appian
4.2 out of 5
Oracle BPM Logo
Appian
4.2 out of 5
Appian enables rapid deployment with intuitive modeling and extensive integration. In comparison, Oracle BPM excels in process modeling and integration through BPMN 2.0 and Oracle SOA. Appian is suitable for cloud-focused businesses, while Oracle BPM targets organizations requiring deep Oracle ecosystem integration.
Download Appian vs. Oracle BPM Report
Appian has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle BPM, making it more economical to implement. Oracle BPM, while pricier upfront, may offer advanced features that justify the initial investment for large-scale operations.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle BPM, making it more economical to implement. Oracle BPM, while pricier upfront, may offer advanced features that justify the initial investment for large-scale operations.
Oracle BPM Logo
Oracle BPM Logo
SAP Signavio Process Manager
4.1 out of 5
Oracle BPM targets technically complex settings with strong integration capabilities and standards compliance. In comparison, SAP Signavio focuses on usability with an intuitive interface and collaboration features, appealing to organizations that prioritize ease of use and team interactions.
Download Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report
Oracle BPM has a higher setup cost compared to SAP Signavio Process Manager, which offers more budget-friendly options. SAP Signavio's pricing is more transparent, making it easier for businesses to project initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle BPM has a higher setup cost compared to SAP Signavio Process Manager, which offers more budget-friendly options. SAP Signavio's pricing is more transparent, making it easier for businesses to project initial expenses.
Oracle BPM Logo
Pega Platform
4.1 out of 5
Oracle BPM Logo
Pega Platform
4.1 out of 5
Pega Platform excels in case management and rapid prototyping for agile development, enhancing customer experiences. In comparison, Oracle BPM is noted for strong process modeling and BPMN 2.0 compatibility, appealing to business and technical users with robust integration capabilities.
Download Oracle BPM vs. Pega Platform Report
Pega Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle BPM. Oracle BPM’s higher initial investment may suit larger enterprises needing extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Pega Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle BPM. Oracle BPM’s higher initial investment may suit larger enterprises needing extensive features.
Oracle BPM Logo
Bizagi
4.2 out of 5
Oracle BPM Logo
Bizagi
4.2 out of 5
Bizagi offers cost-effectiveness and ease of use, ideal for quick deployments without extensive teams. In comparison, Oracle BPM provides advanced integration tools and workflow management, catering to enterprises needing extensive scalability and functional depth despite higher costs and complexity.
Download Bizagi vs. Oracle BPM Report
Bizagi offers a more straightforward setup process compared to Oracle BPM, which tends to involve a higher initial investment and complexity in implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Bizagi offers a more straightforward setup process compared to Oracle BPM, which tends to involve a higher initial investment and complexity in implementation.
Oracle BPM Logo
IBM BPM
3.9 out of 5
Oracle BPM Logo
IBM BPM
3.9 out of 5
Oracle BPM offers robust integration and a rich feature set, ideal for businesses needing comprehensive service and application integration. In comparison, IBM BPM excels in process orchestration and flexibility. A tech buyer might choose Oracle for strong database integration and IBM for scalability.
Download IBM BPM vs. Oracle BPM Report
Oracle BPM has a moderate setup cost, whereas IBM BPM tends to have higher initial expenses, highlighting a key financial consideration for businesses when choosing between these business process management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle BPM has a moderate setup cost, whereas IBM BPM tends to have higher initial expenses, highlighting a key financial consideration for businesses when choosing between these business process management solutions.
Oracle BPM Logo
ARIS BPA
4.2 out of 5
Oracle BPM Logo
ARIS BPA
4.2 out of 5
ARIS BPA excels in process documentation and modeling with enhanced collaboration features. In comparison, Oracle BPM provides strong execution and integration, making it ideal for dynamic workflows. ARIS BPA suits robust modeling needs, while Oracle BPM is preferred for execution and integration capabilities.
Download ARIS BPA vs. Oracle BPM Report
Prices are high. However, they are worth it if the organization utilizes the tool to its full potential.
The tool is expensive.
View comparison
Pricing
Prices are high. However, they are worth it if the organization utilizes the tool to its full potential.
The tool is expensive.
Oracle BPM Logo
Apache Airflow
4.0 out of 5
Oracle BPM Logo
Apache Airflow
4.0 out of 5
Oracle BPM offers comprehensive BPM features and strong process modeling that integrate with Oracle's SOA, suitable for complex enterprise needs. In comparison, Apache Airflow provides flexible, cost-effective data pipeline orchestration with Python automation, ideal for startups seeking efficient, open-source solutions.
Download Apache Airflow vs. Oracle BPM Report
Oracle BPM has a higher setup cost compared to Apache Airflow, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle BPM has a higher setup cost compared to Apache Airflow, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup for businesses.
Oracle BPM Logo
AWS Step Functions
4.2 out of 5
Oracle BPM Logo
AWS Step Functions
4.2 out of 5
Oracle BPM excels in enterprise integration with user-friendly modeling and comprehensive metrics, ideal for business users and developers alike. In comparison, AWS Step Functions provides advanced workflow integration across AWS services with a flexible, graphical interface, making it suitable for seamless AWS orchestration.
Download AWS Step Functions vs. Oracle BPM Report
Oracle BPM incurs substantial setup costs, contrasting with AWS Step Functions, which offers a lower initial investment. This cost disparity highlights Oracle BPM's comprehensive approach, while AWS Step Functions focuses on cost-effective efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle BPM incurs substantial setup costs, contrasting with AWS Step Functions, which offers a lower initial investment. This cost disparity highlights Oracle BPM's comprehensive approach, while AWS Step Functions focuses on cost-effective efficiency.
Oracle BPM Logo
Oracle BPM Logo
Nintex Process Platform
3.9 out of 5
Nintex Process Platform offers flexibility with cost-effective pricing and fast deployment, appealing to businesses prioritizing workflow automation. In comparison, Oracle BPM provides comprehensive integration suited for complex process modeling, making it ideal for larger enterprises requiring detailed business process management capabilities.
Download Nintex Process Platform vs. Oracle BPM Report
Nintex Process Platform offers a low entry cost for setup, focusing on quick deployment, while Oracle BPM typically requires a higher initial investment, appealing to enterprises seeking extensive capabilities and integrations.
View comparison
Pricing
Nintex Process Platform offers a low entry cost for setup, focusing on quick deployment, while Oracle BPM typically requires a higher initial investment, appealing to enterprises seeking extensive capabilities and integrations.
Oracle BPM Logo
ADONIS
3.9 out of 5
Oracle BPM Logo
ADONIS
3.9 out of 5
Oracle BPM excels in enterprise-level integration and security. In comparison, ADONIS prioritizes agile process modeling for simplicity. While Oracle BPM's strengths include integration with Oracle products, ADONIS's appeal lies in its ease of use and rapid deployment for cost-effective solutions.
Download ADONIS vs. Oracle BPM Report
Oracle BPM has a higher setup cost compared to ADONIS, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle BPM has a higher setup cost compared to ADONIS, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two platforms.
Oracle BPM Logo
ARIS Cloud
4.0 out of 5
Oracle BPM Logo
ARIS Cloud
4.0 out of 5
Oracle BPM offers extensive integration capabilities, especially within the Oracle ecosystem, excelling in workflow management and customization. In comparison, ARIS Cloud provides strong modeling capabilities and flexibility, making it suitable for diverse environments with user-friendly APIs and easier collaboration features.
Download ARIS Cloud vs. Oracle BPM Report
Oracle BPM has a higher setup cost compared to ARIS Cloud, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle BPM has a higher setup cost compared to ARIS Cloud, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
Oracle BPM Logo
Oracle BPM Logo
IBM Business Automation Workflow
3.9 out of 5
Oracle BPM is favored for process modeling, BPMN 2.0 support, and workflow engines, while facing challenges with interface complexity and customization. In comparison, IBM Business Automation Workflow highlights AI integration and configurability but struggles with integration complexity and user-friendliness, despite a strong focus on connecting processes.
Download IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. Oracle BPM Report
Oracle BPM has a higher setup cost, demanding a significant initial investment, while IBM Business Automation Workflow offers a more competitive pricing structure, making it more accessible for organizations with limited budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle BPM has a higher setup cost, demanding a significant initial investment, while IBM Business Automation Workflow offers a more competitive pricing structure, making it more accessible for organizations with limited budgets.
Oracle BPM Logo
Newgen OmniFlow
3.9 out of 5
Oracle BPM Logo
Newgen OmniFlow
3.9 out of 5
Oracle BPM is favored for robust modeling, automation, and pricing. In comparison, Newgen OmniFlow excels in adaptability and scalability. Oracle BPM offers process integration ease, while OmniFlow's advanced tools promise efficiency. Oracle BPM attracts with cost-effectiveness; however, OmniFlow ensures better ROI.
Download Newgen OmniFlow vs. Oracle BPM Report
Oracle BPM has a higher setup cost compared to Newgen OmniFlow. While Newgen OmniFlow offers a more budget-friendly implementation, Oracle BPM provides a robust infrastructure that justifies its initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle BPM has a higher setup cost compared to Newgen OmniFlow. While Newgen OmniFlow offers a more budget-friendly implementation, Oracle BPM provides a robust infrastructure that justifies its initial investment.
Oracle BPM Logo
Aurea CX Process
4.0 out of 5
Oracle BPM Logo
Aurea CX Process
4.0 out of 5
View comparison

Related categories

Business Process Management (BPM)
Data Integration
Data Quality