Nintex Process Platform vs Oracle BPM comparison

Nintex and Oracle are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Nintex is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. Nintex holds a 2.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to Oracle’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Nintex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

2,623 Views
1,564 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Oracle BPM

Read 25 Oracle BPM reviews

1,499 Views
1,196 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Oracle BPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and Oracle BPM Suite both compete in the business process management category. While Nintex excels in ease of use and specific integrations, Oracle BPM offers comprehensive industry-standard process modeling and integration capabilities, often making it the favored choice for complex enterprise environments.

Features: Nintex provides scalability and high performance, with SmartForms enabling quick web form development and seamless mobile integration. It leverages its SmartObject technology for robust data management and effortless workflow creation, particularly within SharePoint. Oracle BPM focuses on process modeling using BPMN 2.0 and Java EE Connector Architecture. It excels in integration with third-party systems and comprehensive metrics reporting, supporting both industry standards and business rules that enhance workflow management.

Room for Improvement: Nintex could advance its management console and error reporting; users find managing workflows challenging due to inadequate troubleshooting information. Additionally, performance can suffer under heavy server load. Oracle BPM users find it costly and complex, particularly with integration lacking in modern API standards and AI technology. On-premise solutions have a steep learning curve and are often labeled cumbersome.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex allows flexible deployment both on-premises and in the cloud, backed by 24/7 global support. However, its response times can sometimes be slow. Oracle BPM mainly supports on-premises deployment with limited hybrid cloud solutions, and its technical support is often criticized for inefficiency in problem resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex is considered expensive, especially compared to Microsoft's native functions. Its shift from a perpetual to consumption-based pricing model aids scalability but can quickly increase costs. Despite the expense, ROI is positive due to workflow efficiencies. Oracle BPM's pricing is high, with comprehensive licensing and additional support charges, though it offers significant ROI through advanced process automation and integration efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. Oracle BPM Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. Oracle BPM

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (9th), Workload Automation (11th)

Oracle BPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

15th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.2%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle BPM is 1.9%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Damilola Adeleye

Business Automation Developer at Polaris Bank Nigeria Plc

Straightforward interface and user-friendly

There are a lot of apps in K2, but what I really found that needs improvement is the management section of K2, especially the management server and the admin page where you can manage processes, add users, set security fees, and add licenses. The reason for this is because the part that is the section of administration, particularly the management called rows, has multiple rules, as many as you want. For instance, you may have around 200 rules, and when you view them, only the first ten are displayed, and you have to click next to see the next ten and so on until you get to the hundredth rule. On that page, as of today, we only have what we call to fetch, where you can search for a particular rule you're looking for, or else you have to keep clicking until you get to the final page you want. So that's a bit challenging.

Read full review

SatyajitSethy

Architect at Netcracker

Provides a complete workflow from testing to production and can handle a million concurrent requests

The user interface is very good. Once you understand it, it's easy to define rules and do any configurations. It comes with an embedded WebLogic application server, which you have to deploy automatically. Once you run the given binary, it will automatically keep everything on the backend. You'll have to create an instant database, and maintain or manage it based on the rules engine. After that, your system is ready to test. The most valuable feature is the complete workflow through the BPM, from making it available as a generated code based on the backend, deploying it in the test environment, and then going to production. Throughout the testing, everything was good. Many customers are interested in the rules engine. A lot of requests pass through BPM because it's integrated with a lot of other applications or sub-applications.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's primary advantage is its low-code nature which allows for rapid development without extensive coding."

"The setup is easy."

"It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."

"Allows to use workflow for simple approvals and LazyApproval. The feature is easy to implement for mobile approval."

"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."

"Only Nintex has the feature which allows attachments to an email."

"I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user."

"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"This solution has given us a quick time to market, the ability to integrate with the rest of the corporate applications, and the ability to hire talent in low-cost locations."

"The Workspace is a full, rich application where most users can find what they want. It shows them a list of their work."

"What I found most valuable in Oracle BPM is that it has a lot of out-of-the-box integrations. The solution also provides a lot of adapters which is very helpful."

"We selected this solution not only for the BPM but for the entire package."

"I find the data lineage features most valuable."

"One of the most valuable features is its user-friendly API, which simplifies the implementation of workflows, such as managing inbox tasks for specific users within BPM profiles."

"We have more than 800 distinct applications in our IT landscape. We had enough scalability and okay development cycles, and it has been enough to cover our backup operations and order management systems."

More Oracle BPM pros

Cons

"The license pricing is too high currently for Nintex Workflow."

"The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes."

"Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform."

"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."

"Currently, it's taking quite some time to deploy a package, it needs improvement"

"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."

"We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-prem solution with a flexible price license."

"The Workflow Designer needs improvement."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

"Overall, the engine and the UI both have to be made lighter."

"Every time we roll out a new version of processes, we have to migrate to a new process. The process of this migration was not very smooth. We later decided that it would be easier for us to stop all processes, deploy a new version and then restart."

"Existing APIs in the product need to be fine-tuned, made more robust and flexible for adoption."

"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."

"Pricing is an area that could use improvement."

"There are delays in offering the latest technology, so there is a need to be more responsive to technological changes."

"We have had some issues with version migration, from one version of processes to another. We would have to call Oracle Services but on a day to day, we didn't have any issues."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."

More Oracle BPM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The annual support costs are expensive."

"The enterprise version has some additional features that I would like to use, but the price is not fair."

"Nintex is around INR 200 per license in India, which is much cheaper. Smaller organizations are always looking for cost-effective solutions, and Nintex provides local solutions with very low pricing."

"It's more suited for enterprise level, not for small or medium-sized businesses (SMBs)."

"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."

"Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there."

"This solution is affordable and is cheaper than most alternatives on the market. We have a standard cloud license that costs about 20k per year."

"Comparatively, it's expensive."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

"The licensing for this product is very costly. We pay for a yearly license to use Oracle BPM."

"As with all Oracle products, the licensing over VMware is an issue."

"The pricing is very expensive."

"This solution is very expensive. You are charged per license and an additional 20% for support."

"The pricing is significantly high, particularly for Brazil where fluctuations in the exchange rate between the dollar and the real can further increase the cost of Oracle licenses."

"I don't have information on the exact cost of Oracle BPM because a different team handles that, but it's pretty high. Oracle products are very costly. I would rate pricing for Oracle BPM three out of five. Though the pricing is high, the solution has a lot of features."

"Oracle is good, but they're still expensive compared to other vendors."

"The licensing model is good."

More Oracle BPM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle BPM?

The solution provides extensive functionalities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle BPM?

The licensing is expensive. It needs to be more affordable, especially in the Kenyan market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle BPM?

Oracle BPM should ensure its product is aligned with current technology by keeping up with advancements like AI. There are delays in offering the latest technology, so there is a need to be more re...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 21% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Appian vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Camunda vs Oracle BPM

Compared 27% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Oracle BPM

Compared 26% of the time

IBM BPM vs Oracle BPM

Compared 13% of the time

AWS Step Functions vs Oracle BPM

Compared 10% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Oracle BPM

Compared 8% of the time

More Oracle BPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

April 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPM

April 2025

Download Oracle BPM product report

Also Known As

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Oracle Business Process Management

Overview

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?

Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

Nintex

The Industry's Most Complete and Unified BPM Solution A complete solution for all types of processes that provides a unified process foundation, user-centric design, and social BPM interaction. Reduces complexity and risk and increases business efficiency, visibility, and agility.

Oracle

Sample Customers

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

State Revenue Office Victoria, New South Wales Health, REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P Indonesie

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. Oracle BPM

April 2025

Free Report: Nintex Process Platform vs. Oracle BPM

Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. Oracle BPM and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nintex Process Platform vs. Oracle BPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.