

Oracle BPM and Camunda compete in the BPM software category. Camunda appears to have the upper hand due to its ease-of-use, flexibility, and cost-effective pricing structure.
Features: Oracle BPM offers extensive features for both business and developers, including robust process modeling, business rule integration, and a strong SOA foundation. It also provides comprehensive out-of-the-box tools for application integration. Camunda is known for its ease of use, flexibility, and open-source nature, supporting diverse modeling standards such as BPMN, DMN, and CMMN. It has a simple integration process and offers customization capabilities, backed by a strong developer community.
Room for Improvement: Oracle BPM faces a steep learning curve, especially regarding interface creation and external system integration. Its ADF framework is complex, and users desire better stability and cloud-native features. Camunda could improve its user interface and ease of integration with third-party systems. Users seek better dashboard features, enhanced documentation, and more robust API capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle BPM is primarily deployed on-premises but supports hybrid and public cloud environments. Customer service experiences are mixed, with reports of slow response times. Camunda offers flexible deployment options across on-premises, private, public, and hybrid clouds. It benefits from strong community support and available commercial support for quick resolutions, making deployment more seamless than Oracle BPM.
Pricing and ROI: Oracle BPM has high pricing and significant initial investment costs, with complex licensing, especially regarding cloud preferences and maintenance. Though ROI is good, upfront costs are substantial. Camunda provides a cost-effective structure with its open-source version, while its Enterprise edition is reasonably priced. Its low initial costs contribute to a good ROI, appealing to various business sizes, but costs can increase with extensive enterprise usage.
On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate them a 10 for support.
AWS provides the best support, followed by Microsoft, and then Google.
They provide better support for the enterprise edition.
Camunda offers a high level of scalability, especially when using its SaaS model, which manages and scales implementations automatically.
It allows for easy scaling, especially with ECS service configurations.
They have that REST layer, REST APIs layer that makes it easy to integrate and make it part of a microservices ecosystem and APIs.
There haven't been any significant outages in my experience with Camunda.
We measured the time for each step individually because each activity in the process was an API call to an external API in a different legacy system.
Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version.
There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible.
More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup.
AWS pricing is very competitive compared to Azure and cheap compared to Google.
There is a licensing cost for using the SaaS model and Enterprise edition of Camunda.
The licensing of Oracle BPM will cost around $50,000 plus.
Camunda's support for BPMN 2.0 is a great advantage because it allows us to have a common language to discuss technology and business in the same perspective.
ECS also allows for horizontal scalability with thresholds that can be configured for CPU or memory.
The biggest difference between Camunda and Bonita might be that Camunda is simpler and more flexible for setting.
The most valuable features I find in Oracle BPM include a unified process management platform, human workflow management, and process simulation and optimization.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Camunda | 11.5% |
| Oracle BPM | 1.7% |
| Other | 86.8% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 43 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.
Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.
What are Camunda's key features?
What benefits or ROI should users look for?
In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.