We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and Oracle BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Responsive Portal + Process Federation Server. This set of solutions offers a unified worklist to our customers."
"Integration is a big plus for me."
"It helps improve your process through continual measurement."
"The initial setup is straightforward and easy. I would give it a nine out of ten."
"Its workflow and integration with SAP are the most valuable features. It is also a stable solution."
"The process creation."
"It provides a very robust environment to build an integration framework or workflow patterns that we have. A lot of changes or modifications have been made to this solution over the past few years. The features that they have added this time have helped developers like us to work on the developmental environment and leverage all the capabilities of the tool. This is what I like about this solution."
"IBM BPM is stable."
"One of the most valuable features of Oracle BPM is the workflow itself. It is quite intuitive."
"It has developmental accelerators, which allow for virtually any customization needs which you may require."
"The most valuable feature is the complete workflow through the BPM, from making it available as a generated code based on the backend, deploying it in the test environment, and then going to production."
"The Workspace is a full, rich application where most users can find what they want. It shows them a list of their work."
"The support is good."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The benefit from the tool is we can develop it quickly and easily use it for middleware services. We can publish the services so other applications can consume them. This is providing us some reusability and a type of security."
"It is easy and cheap."
"The stability varies because it involves a lot of other components like databases, so sometimes if something goes wrong there, it can't recover from the fatal errors."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"Better integration with other products in the automation suite."
"Integration with web services, especially in the standard version of the product."
"The initial setup was complex. It is not always easy to launch a new platform and it needed better coordination with IBM."
"Performance in the development environment space. I know that they have been taking it off the desktop version and putting on the web, and it is not 100% yet."
"The analysis reports could be much better."
"I would like it more documentation during the design phase."
"You have to maintain it manually."
"We have had some issues with version migration, from one version of processes to another. We would have to call Oracle Services but on a day to day, we didn't have any issues."
"Overall, the engine and the UI both have to be made lighter."
"Their Case Management set of features is severely lacking and should be a target for immediate improvement dealing with unpredictable processes inside of organizations."
"Pricing is an area that could use improvement."
"Though Oracle BPM is a stable solution, it's very heavy, so this is one area for improvement. If Oracle can make the components of Oracle BPM lighter, and if the deployment for the solution could be easier, that would make Oracle BPM better."
"Oracle BPM could probably be improved with respect to the cost. When you are using this product, it'll be a bit costlier for the ROA. I think they should do some discounts on these products, especially for the licenses."
"From my knowledge of this solution, I don't see that the Oracle BPM includes features such as the growth of discovery and process mining."
IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews while Oracle BPM is ranked 14th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 22 reviews. IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while Oracle BPM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPM writes "Stable, has a lot of features and out-of-the-box integrations, but it's heavy, and the technical support isn't good". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and webMethods Integration Server, whereas Oracle BPM is most compared with Camunda, SAP Signavio Process Manager, AWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow and ARIS BPA. See our IBM BPM vs. Oracle BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.