OPNsense is an adaptable open-source firewall and routing platform appreciated for its flexibility, scalability, and user-friendly interface. It is equipped with robust security features and offers excellent reporting and visibility, essential for small businesses and home setups.


| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OPNsense | 10.3% |
| Fortinet FortiGate | 18.3% |
| Sophos Firewall | 9.4% |
| Other | 62.0% |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fortinet FortiGate | 4.2 | 18.3% | 92% | 587 interviewsAdd to research |
| Netgate pfSense | 4.3 | 9.1% | 93% | 220 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 27 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 860 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 424 |
| Large Enterprise | 803 |
OPNsense stands out for its modular design, allowing cost-effective customization. This system supports VPNs and various firewall capabilities, making it suitable for securing networks from malicious traffic. Its frequent updates and extensive documentation, combined with a supportive online community, enhance user experience. However, there is room for improvement in integration with virtual servers and Azure. Scalability and hardware updates are important for large-scale environments, and users desire more reliable VPN solutions and enhanced threat intelligence tools.
What are OPNsense's most important features?OPNsense is implemented in industries requiring VPN and firewall functions, supporting site-to-site connections, protecting servers, and managing commercial network traffic. Companies apply it for security, UTM, SD-WAN, content filtering, intrusion detection, and prevention, utilizing its open-source nature and effectiveness as a next-generation firewall.
1. Deciso B.V.
2. iXsystems, Inc.
3. EuroBSDCon
4. Netgate
5. Claranet
6. Voleatech
7. Open Systems AG
8. Securebit AG
9. Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH
10. AVM Computersysteme Vertriebs GmbH
Additional customers include: T-Systems International GmbH, Deutsche Telekom AG, Vodafone GmbH, 1&1 IONOS SE, OVHcloud, Hetzner Online GmbH, Strato AG, PlusServer GmbH, Host Europe GmbH, United Internet AG, 1&1 Versatel Deutschland GmbH, QSC AG, Bechtle AG, Cancom SE, Computacenter AG & Co. oHG, T-Systems Multimedia Solutions GmbH, Atos SE, Capgemini SE, Accenture plc, IBM Corporation, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Cisco Systems, Inc.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 27001 Lead Implementer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees | 4.5 | I used OPNsense for my capstone project and home network due to its rich features, reliability, and cost-effectiveness; while it performs well, clearer documentation would improve usability, especially for new users like students. |
| Senior Solutions Engineer at a educational organization with 201-500 employees | 2.5 | I've used OPNsense in a lab setup and appreciate YouTube tutorials for ease of learning, but I find the pricing excessive and support uncertain; overall, I rate it 5 out of 10 due to these concerns. |
| Senior IT Infrastructure Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | I use OPNsense on-premises mainly as a firewall. It's stable, scalable, open source, and cost-effective, helping cut expenses while improving security, though its UI needs improvement compared to alternatives like Sophos. |
| Administrator at a retailer with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I've used OPNsense as my home firewall for two years, primarily valuing its VLAN support for network isolation. It's stable, scalable, and free, though initial setup was tricky and better official setup guidance would help. |
| IT Manager at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees | 4.5 | I use OPNsense for routing and firewalling, valuing built-in WireGuard, real-time filtering, reporting, and effective load balancing/QoS at low cost. Setup is straightforward and stability is high, but I want better wireless/SNMP management and built-in Pi-hole; my nonrecommended NICs sometimes freeze. |
| Senior Client Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.5 | I am a Sales Engineer using OPNsense for demos on the road due to its ease of use, stability, and features like Zenarmor and Tailscale. Although Grafana integrations could improve, it offers significant operational benefits over Check Point and FortiNet. |
| IT Executive at M.V.electrosystems | 4.5 | Having used OPNsense for five years, I find it highly satisfactory for managing multiple networks. Its reporting, rule management, and load balancing are excellent. My main issues are confusing BSD network interface naming and the necessity of a proxy for antivirus features. |
| Senior Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | I primarily use OPNsense for network security, appreciating its reliable firewall and GeoIP features. It's stable and easy to upgrade. However, improvements are needed for handling large voice and data traffic. Compared to FortiGate, I find OPNsense more user-friendly. |