

Find out in this report how the two Firewalls solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
I have seen a return on investment with Cisco Meraki MX because of the time saved through cloud management.
You can eliminate some positions because it manages itself.
It greatly helps out when I am moving away from the expensive MPLS circuits or MPLS hardware.
The network attacks reduced by approximately 60% after using that, even without customizing the custom configuration yet.
For a very little investment, I was able to increase the security of my network.
The support is excellent, earning a rating of ten out of ten.
Every time I got a hold of someone, I was always able to resolve my issues.
When we raise a ticket with Meraki MX, they instantly become available to support us for configurations or troubleshooting.
Compared to some open-source projects with weak support, OPNsense stands out for having both a strong community and commercial backing options.
I mainly rely on community support since the solution is open source.
If you say you do not have one, it is finished. This is where the monopoly starts.
When you have hundreds of thousands of people it is very difficult to scale in Meraki.
The scalability of Cisco Meraki MX is rated 10 out of 10; you can scale up and scale down with no effort.
Cisco Meraki MX scales with my growing needs for my organization very well because they are easy to deploy.
I use Zenarmor, pinning it to one core for packet inspection, and the CPU performance seems very good.
OPNsense's scalability is excellent; I just need to resize my hardware and upgrade the server, and voilà, I am good to go.
In theory, OPNsense can handle small home networks and even large enterprise environments if deployed on sufficiently powerful hardware or virtualized on a clustered system.
There have been no outages, no stability issues, and we have not found any vulnerabilities during security audits.
I have had zero downtime at all with Cisco Meraki MX.
I assess the stability and the reliability of Cisco Meraki MX as good, and I have experienced no downtime, crashes, or performance issues.
For home and small network use, OPNsense is also reliable, providing enterprise-grade security at no cost.
The only challenge faced was its inadequacy to manage large voice traffic effectively, even with dedicated hardware.
At the latest code level, I haven't experienced any crashes.
It should automatically remediate and find out the issue and then resolve it on its own without interrupting the work of the employees.
Data is the only path, so optimization is essential.
An improvement would be to use Cisco Meraki MX as a software solution as well, which might reduce the cost.
Enhancing its performance for significant amounts of data traffic would make it closer to a perfect solution.
It would be beneficial if they could create some videos on how to set it up themselves.
The documentation should be clearer because I faced some difficulties navigating many options.
I get it for $25,000, a device that can connect up to 75-100 users, whereas in Meraki MX, it goes to 75,000-80,000 per access point.
The price could be reduced by around 30% to make it more comfortable.
If Cisco can make the pricing less, customers can purchase more licenses.
I consider the pricing of OPNsense to be high when compared with other market products.
OPNsense is free, the licensing and setup was easy.
Meraki MX is among those top solutions in their exceptional approach towards VPN-less, Zero Trust client access to office private networks.
Advanced security is the second tier of Cisco Meraki MX. It brings you the main next-generation firewalling features such as URL filtering, advanced malware protection, and threat protection.
Cisco Meraki MX API makes it really easy for me to automate a lot of changes over several thousand devices.
The most valuable features include the basic firewall functionality and the GeoIP location services.
I can have a Wi-Fi VLAN and feel secure that the server network or the VM network that I have on a different VLAN are isolated, and they cannot talk to one another, which adds a great level of security.
It offers enterprise-grade features such as intrusion detection and prevention system, VPN support, traffic shaping, and web filtering, all without license cost.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OPNsense | 7.0% |
| Cisco Meraki MX | 3.8% |
| Other | 89.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 50 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 20 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Cisco Meraki MX offers centralized management for network security and SD-WAN, featuring advanced threat protection, VPN capabilities, and seamless integration with other Cisco products. It enhances operational efficiency through cloud management and intuitive interface.
Cisco Meraki MX is designed for ease of use with a user-friendly cloud management platform that provides real-time insights through a centralized dashboard. It includes AutoVPN for secure remote connections and advanced threat protection to ensure consistent policy enforcement. Its integration capabilities with Cisco products streamline network administration. Users highlight the need for improvements in advanced reporting, detailed alerts, and enhanced API flexibility. Cost concerns are noted, alongside desires for better security analytics and improved customer support.
What are the key features of Cisco Meraki MX?Cisco Meraki MX is implemented in industries like telecommunications and healthcare for secure network management and centralized control. It supports zero-touch deployment, dynamic routing, and traffic shaping, making it ideal for ISPs and multi-site environments, as well as managing Wi-Fi networks and guest security for wireless users.
OPNsense is a robust open-source platform known for its intuitive GUI, firewall capabilities, and seamless network management. It provides essential security features such as VPN and IDS/IPS, catering to organizations looking for reliable and custom-configurable solutions.
Renowned for its user-centric approach, OPNsense integrates functionality with scalability, making it a preferred choice for both on-premises and cloud deployments. Employing regular updates, OPNsense enhances security and offers modular configurations, DNS-level filtering, content control, and load balancing. Users value the platform's resilience and its ability to support features like WireGuard and Zenarmor for improved security management, especially appreciated by budget-conscious entities. However, complexity in its interface and reporting, along with challenges in cloud integration and API, require attention. Users also suggest improvements in VPN and firewall customization and seek better documentation and tools, considering the current pricing structure.
What are the key features of OPNsense?In industries ranging from corporate enterprises to home offices, OPNsense is implemented for securing server data, managing VPN links, and enforcing firewall policies. It is particularly favored for providing secure remote access, efficient network management, and the flexibility needed for specific business requirements, whether deployed in cloud environments or traditional setups.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.