KerioConnect Reviews

KerioConnect's pricing is approximately $3 per mailbox monthly and is considered more affordable compared to Google, Microsoft, or Zoho. It offers clear, competitive pricing with both first-time costs and yearly subscriptions. While some users find the annual cost between $2,000 to $3,000 expensive, many appreciate its simplicity and cost-effectiveness relative to alternatives like Office 365. Users benefit from a monitoring system for subscriptions, helping with renewals efficiently.

• "KerioConnect has a first-time cost and yearly subscription. It is not expensive."
• "The solution's pricing depends on how long you plan to keep it because you pay on a per-year basis. You might have a one-time setup cost for something like Microsoft Exchange or a Linux mail server. I'd say this solution is expensive on a per-year basis, almost 2000-3000 dollars annually. It doesn't seem to pay off yet, so we're considering switching to another product."
• "The price of Kerio Connect is better when comparing it to others solutions."

KerioConnect is primarily used by small and medium-sized businesses as an alternative to Exchange. It's implemented as a mail server for managing emails and facilitating collaboration through calendaring and contact integrations. Organizations utilize it on Linux and Windows environments for on-premises email hosting, particularly for warehouse distribution and retail sectors. Some users connect it with Outlook, and it serves both corporate and client domains for email and collaboration services.

KerioConnect's customer service receives praise for quick, knowledgeable responses. Users report fast assistance upon creating a ticket. Their technical staff is skilled at addressing specific queries, though assistance for broader issues might require more effort. Support begins with resellers, followed by distributors, then GFI's AI or direct communication. Users appreciate reliable service, noting rapid replies to website tickets. Some indicate server crashes may require significant time to resolve, especially without clear documentation.

KerioConnect's initial setup is often seen as straightforward, especially by those with IT knowledge. Installation on Linux or Windows takes minutes, although some complexity exists if detailed server or email protocol settings are required. Maintenance varies based on team size. Flexibility surpasses Google for those familiar with technologies like SMTP and firewall configurations. Admins find configuration easy with minimal experience, but comprehensive familiarity improves efficiency. Deployment can include installing on a server, setting domains, users, and filters.

KerioConnect scales well, accommodating up to 10,000 users. It fits small to medium companies, handling multiple domains and supporting clustering. Scalability depends on infrastructure like I/O and drive capacity. Users report robust performance but note limitations with large volumes of data and integration with external systems. Some organizations prefer cloud versions for enhanced scalability. It works efficiently with sufficient resources, offering excellent security and privacy for its customer base.

KerioConnect is recognized for its stability and reliability. Users indicate it operates smoothly without bugs, crashes, or glitches as long as systems are stable. It is stable on both Windows Server 2012 and Linux platforms, with features like anti-virus and two-factor authentication enhancing security. Some users mention stability remains high with minimal maintenance, though functionality may be limited. Usage of a strong password is advised to maintain stability.