KerioConnect Reviews

We primarily use the product as an integrated solution for our calendars and contacts and everything else. It's attached to our carrier operator.

It's a very healthy solution. It has a good survey or features that we like to use.

The user interface is good.

The implementation process isn't too complex.

We've been happy with the solution. It's worked for us so far so it's fine.

If they could integrate some sort of AI into the solution to make it more efficient, that would be interesting.

Most of our clients use Outlook and Kerio Connect. Occasionally, Kerio can be a bit slow. They could make it faster to get onto the web interface without so much load time. It's just slow with Outlook, however, for some reason.

We've been using the solution since the product's inception. It's been about 15 years or so.

As long as the operating is stable, the Kerio connect will be very stable as well, so we don't have any problem with it. There aren't bugs and glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. I consider it reliable.

The solution can scale quite well. It can accommodate 10,000 depending on your hardware. It's quite robust.

It's a multi-domain solution. More than one company can be on the solution at one time.

We don't plan on increasing usage at this time.

The solution's implementation is not complex in any way. It's pretty straightforward. We're using Linux systems to install it, however, we stay away from Window's services. That's a personal preference thing on our end.

We tend to maintain the solution for our clients. We have one person who handles maintenance and she's knowledgeable in everything from hardware to software to the operating system.

We had help on the more technical details of the setup.

The pricing is about $3 per mailbox per month.

We have a mix of deployment models, beyond just the cloud.

If you're an admin, it's much preferable to use Kerio Connect because it's, easy to manage.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I'd rate the solution at and eight. There's no perfect system, however, this solution works quite well for us.

We have not used this solution on a business level, but we have had other clients who are using this solution.

We don't have uses for this solution, but some users have historically used it where they had onsite or on-premises email servers.

With the ubiquity of Microsoft Exchange, we don't see it being used very often.

I don't find it easy to use, but it might be because it is not my main technology.

It could be simpler to use and install, but I still wouldn't use it because there isn't a compelling use case.

I have been dealing with Kerio Connect for two years.

I can be deployed both on the cloud, and on-premise, it depends on what our clients use.

We have five customers who use this solution.

We have contacted technical support a handful of times and received some assistance.

We also use Microsoft Exchange.

In my opinion, I find the setup to be complex.

The number of people required to maintain this solution depends on the size of their team.

I don't particularly like this solution. I prefer Microsoft solutions. I am more comfortable using them. I have more experience.

I would not recommend this solution to others.  I would not really use this solution, most of our clients use 365.

I would rate Kerio Connect a two out of ten.

This solution is our SMB alternative to Exchange. We have installed it for more than forty SMB customers, in a Linux environment with all of the collaboration features.

This is the first SMB product in our portfolio. It has improved our ability to offer customers a solution with ease of use, ease of support, and Kerio's ability to cover all of the aspects offered by their big counterparts.

The most valuable features are its ease of use, excellent pricing, and it is platform agnostic.

I would like to see better support from their support team.

More than ten years.