Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Reviews

We are currently using Ansible for Jira installations and all the management tasks. We perform some tasks manually, however, Ansible helps in automating some of these processes.

I find JBoss to be lightweight and easier to manage compared to WebSphere. It allows for simple modification of applications and provides better clustering capabilities. The setup was straightforward and suitable for enterprise-level needs.

Our product is agnostic, so we have been using JBoss as our default app server. We have been using it for over ten years.

JBoss is more flexible and keeps up with modern technologies, supporting newer versions of different libraries. This is crucial as the lifecycle of these technologies is short, and staying up to date is essential to avoid issues.

My main use case for JBoss is the administration of the application mostly.

My use case implies installation, configuration, and setting JBoss EAP on different systems such as Linux, Windows and configuring the standalone or domain. This implies working with the web console, automation tools, and CLI. Additionally, it involves securing it, implementing authentication, RBAC or Role-Based Access Control, SSL, TLS, and so on. Performance tuning, thread pool management, logging, and clustering are mostly what I have done with the product.

JBoss has positively impacted my organization by enabling deployment with enterprise extensions that were needed, particularly for integration with directory services. The difference came in implementation, and it offers a significant role in deployment that is scalable, especially when using a clustering way of working with it.

Specific outcomes include improved deployment times due to modular architecture leveraging lazy loading, which affects the time taken to deploy archive, war, or ear files, and the deployment success rate without server restarts. This impact has significantly enhanced stability and reduced downtime. Lower memory consumption during deployment has been apparent thanks to subsystem isolation, while asynchronous deployment handling has reduced spikes and led to fewer errors with better validation overlay support in cases of failed deployments or rollback events. Additionally, I have enabled quick fixes without full redeployments, particularly with frequent overlay-based updates.

I have used Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) in many projects. As a Java developer, I have worked with ATG and we have used the application server Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) extensively for building applications and deployments.

We use Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) in our application development. We have utilized Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) as an application server for deployment purposes. For local running and operating particular applications locally, we have extensively used Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP). I have primarily worked as an application developer.

When we used Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP), it was mostly in monolith applications. It is a very cost-effective, efficient way of deploying and managing Java applications. The main important aspects are the flexibility and scalability of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP). It runs on various platforms, from small devices to large servers, and we can easily scale down and scale up.

The integration with external applications, web servers, or other systems is very straightforward in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP). We have robust security features. Additionally, there are excellent Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) community resources available, which provides documentation for troubleshooting deployment issues.

I use it for Java server applications.

I work on an output management system. There are products that use JBoss as the Java server. It's a product from another vendor called the 'M' series. They use JBoss as the server behind it.

In my previous company, we relied on third-party APIs from a vendor. Recently, we were tasked with bringing those APIs in-house, reducing dependence on external vendors. We employed a JBoss server to facilitate the transition of these APIs into our existing system.

The tool's most beneficial feature is its scalability. People with limited technical knowledge can quickly grasp its functions with a brief introduction. The tool's ease of use makes it a plug-and-play solution, reducing the effort required to train users on its usage.

We integrated one of the largest payment service providers using JBoss. Specifically, we integrated Visa, a well-known credit and debit card provider, into our system using JBoss. As the project's lead software engineer, I executed this integration.

Our primary use case is for web applications.

I like that it's open-source and free. All the features are very good.

Our company uses the solution for enterprise clients in the banking and finance industries. 

We use different versions of the open source solution depending on client needs. 

The solution has flexibility and stability.