Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) provides scalable, secure, and reliable infrastructure for Java applications, offering high availability, modular architecture, and smooth integration with new technologies.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) | 16.6% |
Oracle WebLogic Server | 18.4% |
Tomcat | 16.7% |
Other | 48.3% |
Type | Title | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
Category | Application Server | Sep 5, 2025 | Download |
Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Sep 5, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) vs Tomcat | Sep 5, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) vs Oracle WebLogic Server | Sep 5, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) vs IBM WebSphere Application Server | Sep 5, 2025 | Download |
Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Oracle WebLogic Server | 4.0 | 18.4% | 86% | 35 interviewsAdd to research |
IBM WebSphere Application Server | 3.8 | 11.1% | 88% | 31 interviewsAdd to research |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 8 |
Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
Large Enterprise | 16 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 87 |
Midsize Enterprise | 60 |
Large Enterprise | 302 |
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) is tailored for deploying and managing web and application servers, with a strong focus on Java applications, APIs, and core business systems. It ensures easy setup and cost-effectiveness, accommodating high availability and clustering enhancements like session replication via Infinispan. While managing configurations and deployments effectively, EAP facilitates flexible deployment modes and enhanced security using OpenID Connect. However, areas needing improvement include customization options, runtime diagnostics, integration capabilities, documentation, and technical support. Automation needs expansion, pricing options could be more competitive, and better alignment with Jakarta EE is suggested for modernization.
What are the standout features of Red Hat JBoss EAP?Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) finds application across industries such as finance, web development, and enterprise middleware services. Its capabilities are demonstrated in managing banking transactions, supporting legacy systems, integrating with external APIs, and fulfilling enterprise needs in installation, configuration, automation, and security tasks.
Tata Sky, Nissan, Swedish Board of Agriculture, Novamedia, American Product Distributors, Advanced Micro Devices, Emirates Group, E*TRADE
Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
---|---|---|
VP at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I find JBoss to be lightweight, easy to manage, and offering better clustering compared to WebSphere. The setup is straightforward, ideal for enterprise needs, though I wish for improved booting and centralized data management similar to an AWS console. |
Director of Product at a computer software company with 201-500 employees | 4.5 | I've used JBoss as our default app server for over ten years due to its flexibility and ability to stay current with modern technologies, though it could be lighter. Automation with JBoss improves deployment efficiency, lowering total ownership costs. |
DevOps Cloud Engineer at Atos IT Solutions and Services | 4.0 | I use JBoss mainly for application administration, finding it stable, scalable, and rich in features like modular architecture and clustering. It improved deployment efficiency and reduced downtime, though it needs better CLI automation and cloud-native configuration support. |
Network Security Engineer at Samsung | 3.5 | I’ve used Red Hat JBoss EAP extensively for Java application development and deployment. It’s cost-effective, scalable, and integrates well, though it could improve on scaling and cloud features. I’d rate it 7 out of 10. |
Senior Consultant at Inacta AG | 4.0 | I utilize JBoss for Java server applications due to its speed, reliability, and solid reputation, though its cost can be a barrier. Wildfly is a viable alternative for those seeking a free version, especially if support isn't required. |
Product owner at Digitt Plus (AFT) | 4.5 | In my previous company, we used JBoss to bring APIs in-house, valuing its scalability and ease of use for integrating systems like Visa. However, the documentation needs improvement for clearer guidance. Overall, JBoss is cost-effective. |
Senior Architect at Systems Limited | 3.5 | Our company utilizes JBoss for enterprise clients in the banking and finance industries, appreciating its flexibility and stability. However, the solution lacks capabilities for modern needs like microservices. We adapt the open source version according to client requirements. |
AWS / Big Data Engineer at Waste Management, Inc. | 4.0 | I primarily use JBoss for web applications and appreciate that it's open-source and free, offering excellent features. However, the logging aspect, especially login logs and the login process, needs improvement to enhance efficiency. |