Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and Oracle Fusion Middleware are significant contenders in the middleware space. JBoss seems to have the advantage due to its cost-efficiency and scalability, while Oracle's strength lies in its extensive feature set and integration capabilities.
Features: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is recognized for its scalability, strong Java application support, and ease of deployment. It benefits from a robust community and an open-source nature, offering advanced J2EE features. Oracle Fusion Middleware excels in flexibility and comprehensive application adapters, facilitating smooth integration with Oracle products. Its cloud-readiness and regular updates are key strengths.
Room for Improvement: JBoss could enhance automation and modern technology integration to mitigate user challenges, with technical support and pricing being notable concerns. Oracle Fusion Middleware needs better adaptability to non-Oracle systems and containerization, and users desire enhanced customization and clearer documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JBoss offers versatile deployment options across on-premises and hybrid cloud environments and benefits from strong community support, though technical support quality feedback varies. Oracle Fusion Middleware is adaptable to public clouds but noted for high setup complexity and expensive support options, despite seamless Oracle system integration.
Pricing and ROI: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is generally more cost-effective with flexible licensing, offering good ROI with Red Hat support. Users highlight its lower total cost of ownership compared to Oracle WebLogic. Oracle Fusion Middleware is typically more costly, accessible mainly to larger enterprises. While expensive, users acknowledge its integration capabilities and cloud-readiness as valuable, delivering ROI through updates and features.
Oracle Fusion Middleware is a good product that meets ROI expectations.
This flexibility translates to a lower total cost of ownership.
Oracle provides eight-level customer service and support.
Customer service for Oracle products, including Oracle Fusion Middleware, is rated at nine points out of ten, indicating it is quite satisfactory.
We receive support from RDS and Red Hat, and the response time and quality meet our expectations.
Users can find discussions about common problems, solutions, and documentation within the community.
For on-premises deployment, scalability has to be managed manually.
Overall, Oracle Fusion Middleware's stability is good.
It is quite stable for our needs.
The guides often have errors, such as web scripting issues, and can be difficult to follow.
Although Oracle provides support, I need the appropriate IT team to adopt these new features.
Making it lighter and more modular would probably be beneficial.
I would like to see improved booting of applications altogether on one page to manage all data instances from one location, similar to an AWS console.
Oracle Fusion Middleware is generally expensive, although I'm not directly involved with the licensing aspects.
Pricing varies from customer to customer, however, it is reasonable compared to other products in the market.
JBoss is the cheaper option out of the three when compared to WebSphere and WebLogic.
The price is somewhat high for an enterprise, however, it depends on organizational negotiations.
Compared to competitors, its cost-effectiveness and Oracle's regular updates every three months are advantageous.
Oracle Fusion Middleware's base installation is ready to use, allowing for quick integration of applications and installation of necessary resources.
Built-in metrics and subsystem isolation, where every subsystem logging, messaging, or web services can be tuned independently, provide fine-grained control over performance and behavior.
It allows for simple modification of applications and provides better clustering capabilities.
JBoss is more flexible and keeps up with modern technologies, supporting newer versions of different libraries.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) | 16.6% |
| Oracle Fusion Middleware | 5.5% |
| Other | 77.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
Oracle Fusion Middleware is the digital business platform for the enterprise and the cloud. It enables enterprises to create and run agile, intelligent business applications while maximizing IT efficiency through full utilization of modern hardware and software architectures.
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) provides scalable, secure, and reliable infrastructure for Java applications, offering high availability, modular architecture, and smooth integration with new technologies.
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) is tailored for deploying and managing web and application servers, with a strong focus on Java applications, APIs, and core business systems. It ensures easy setup and cost-effectiveness, accommodating high availability and clustering enhancements like session replication via Infinispan. While managing configurations and deployments effectively, EAP facilitates flexible deployment modes and enhanced security using OpenID Connect. However, areas needing improvement include customization options, runtime diagnostics, integration capabilities, documentation, and technical support. Automation needs expansion, pricing options could be more competitive, and better alignment with Jakarta EE is suggested for modernization.
What are the standout features of Red Hat JBoss EAP?Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) finds application across industries such as finance, web development, and enterprise middleware services. Its capabilities are demonstrated in managing banking transactions, supporting legacy systems, integrating with external APIs, and fulfilling enterprise needs in installation, configuration, automation, and security tasks.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
