Top 10 Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

28 reviews
95% willing to recommend

Top Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Oracle WebLogic Server, IBM WebSphere Application Server, and IIS. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) surpasses its competitors by offering robust cloud-native architecture, efficient Java EE implementation, seamless deployment management, and exceptional scalability, making it an ideal choice for enterprises seeking reliable and flexible application server solutions.

Red Hat Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Red Hat, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Oracle WebLogic Server

4.0 out of 5

Oracle WebLogic Server

4.0 out of 5

Oracle WebLogic Server offers robust administration and integrates well with Oracle products. In comparison, Red Hat JBoss EAP provides open-source flexibility and cost-effectiveness, suitable for hybrid cloud. A buyer might prioritize WebLogic's enterprise capabilities or JBoss's flexible, lower-cost approach.

Download Oracle WebLogic Server vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Report

Pricing

Oracle WebLogic Server has a higher initial setup cost compared to Red Hat JBoss EAP, which offers a more cost-effective solution for businesses with tighter budgets.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle WebLogic Server has a higher initial setup cost compared to Red Hat JBoss EAP, which offers a more cost-effective solution for businesses with tighter budgets.

IBM WebSphere Application Server

3.8 out of 5

IBM WebSphere Application Server

3.8 out of 5

IBM WebSphere suits enterprises needing robust integration and advanced management tools, while JBoss EAP provides flexibility and strong support for microservices. In comparison, JBoss EAP's open-source foundation aids cost-efficient deployment, whereas WebSphere offers structured deployment with comprehensive customer support.

Download IBM WebSphere Application Server vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Report

Pricing

IBM WebSphere Application Server has higher setup costs with robust support, while Red Hat JBoss EAP offers a more cost-effective setup suitable for budget-conscious enterprises.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM WebSphere Application Server has higher setup costs with robust support, while Red Hat JBoss EAP offers a more cost-effective setup suitable for budget-conscious enterprises.

IIS

4.0 out of 5

IIS

4.0 out of 5

IIS offers easy deployment through Windows integration and strong security. In comparison, JBoss provides scalability and robust Java support ideal for flexible enterprise needs. Tech buyers might choose IIS for seamless Windows use or JBoss for cost-efficient Java capabilities.

Download IIS vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Report

Pricing

IIS offers a straightforward setup process often associated with lower initial costs, whereas Red Hat JBoss EAP typically involves a more complex setup with higher costs due to its comprehensive enterprise features.

View comparison

Pricing

Tomcat

4.2 out of 5

Tomcat

4.2 out of 5

Red Hat JBoss EAP excels with scalability, high availability, and robust enterprise features. In comparison, Tomcat suits lightweight applications with its simplicity and low resource usage. JBoss offers strong vendor support, while Tomcat’s community support appeals to cost-conscious users and smaller deployments.

Download Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) vs. Tomcat Report

Pricing

Red Hat JBoss EAP typically involves a higher setup cost compared to Tomcat, which offers a more cost-effective initial implementation, underscoring significant cost differences between the two platforms in deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Fusion Middleware

4.1 out of 5

Oracle Fusion Middleware

4.1 out of 5

JBoss EAP offers cost-effective, scalable Java solutions with robust stability across platforms. In comparison, Oracle Fusion Middleware provides extensive integration within Oracle's ecosystem, appealing for its advanced enterprise functionalities. Buyers select JBoss for open-source flexibility, while Oracle excels in comprehensive middleware capabilities.

Download Oracle Fusion Middleware vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Report

Pricing

Red Hat JBoss EAP offers a straightforward setup that is typically quicker and more cost-effective, whereas Oracle Fusion Middleware tends to have a more complex and expensive initial setup process.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat JBoss EAP offers a straightforward setup that is typically quicker and more cost-effective, whereas Oracle Fusion Middleware tends to have a more complex and expensive initial setup process.

Oracle Application Server

3.0 out of 5

Oracle Application Server

3.0 out of 5

Red Hat JBoss EAP offers pricing flexibility and straightforward deployment, appealing to budget-conscious organizations desiring easy setup and open-source integration. In comparison, Oracle Application Server provides extensive features and advanced security, suitable for enterprises requiring comprehensive capabilities and willing to invest more initially.

Download Oracle Application Server vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Report

Pricing

Red Hat JBoss EAP often presents lower setup costs due to its open-source model, whereas Oracle Application Server typically incurs higher costs due to its comprehensive enterprise features and proprietary nature.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle GlassFish

3.0 out of 5

Oracle GlassFish

3.0 out of 5

Oracle GlassFish attracts those seeking a lightweight, easily integrated solution ideal for small to mid-sized projects. In comparison, Red Hat JBoss EAP, with its advanced resource management and support, appeals to enterprises needing robust, scalable solutions with comprehensive deployment support.

Pricing

Oracle GlassFish is often praised for its straightforward setup process and lower initial costs, whereas Red Hat JBoss EAP is noted for having a more complex setup with potentially higher associated costs.

View comparison

Pricing

Caucho Resin

1 out of 5

Caucho Resin

1 out of 5

Caucho Resin attracts with competitive pricing and straightforward deployment, appealing to smaller teams seeking quick ROI. In comparison, Red Hat JBoss EAP offers robust features like extensive integration and scalability, suitable for enterprises needing comprehensive management tools despite higher initial costs.

Pricing

Caucho Resin offers a lower initial setup cost compared to Red Hat JBoss EAP, making it a more cost-effective option for budget-conscious projects, while JBoss EAP may entail a higher investment upfront.

View comparison

Pricing

Fujitsu Interstage Application Server

1 out of 5

Fujitsu Interstage Application Server

1 out of 5

Fujitsu Interstage offers cost-effective pricing and excellent customer support, appealing to organizations seeking ease of deployment. In comparison, Red Hat JBoss EAP provides extensive features and scalability, attracting tech buyers interested in long-term value and advanced capabilities.

Pricing

Fujitsu Interstage Application Server typically has a lower setup cost than Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP), making it a more cost-effective option for initial deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

Fujitsu Interstage Application Server typically has a lower setup cost than Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP), making it a more cost-effective option for initial deployment.

TmaxSoft JEUS

1 out of 5

TmaxSoft JEUS

1 out of 5

JBoss EAP is valued for its integration within the Red Hat ecosystem, offering extensive support and scalability. In comparison, TmaxSoft JEUS focuses on high-performance solutions with advanced deployment features, attracting organizations prioritizing innovation and cutting-edge technology.

Pricing

Red Hat JBoss EAP has a moderate setup cost while TmaxSoft JEUS offers a more cost-effective setup option.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat JBoss EAP has a moderate setup cost while TmaxSoft JEUS offers a more cost-effective setup option.

Related categories

Application Server

Application Infrastructure