Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Git Logo

Git Reviews

Vendor: Git
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Git?

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.
Get the Git Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Git, Bitbucket, GitHub and more!
Git is the #5 ranked solution in top Version Control solutions. PeerSpot users give Git an average rating of 8.6 out of 10. Git is most commonly compared to Bitbucket: Git vs Bitbucket. Git is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 63% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 19% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Git
December 2025
Get the report
Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Featured Git reviews

Read more reviews

Git mindshare

As of December 2025, the mindshare of Git in the Version Control category stands at 10.6%, up from 7.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Git10.6%
Bitbucket21.3%
Bitbucket Server16.3%
Other51.8%
Version Control

PeerResearch reports based on Git reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryVersion ControlDec 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonGit vs BitbucketDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonGit vs Bitbucket ServerDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonGit vs GitHubDec 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Bitbucket4.221.3%98%51 interviewsAdd to research
GitHub4.48.5%100%97 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Popular features of Git include ease of version control, tracking changes, collaboration capabilities, ease of merging code, CLI and GUI support, automated deployment, stability, and broad compatibility. Its ability to handle multiple branches, roll back versions, maintain detailed logs, manage repositories, and integrate with other tools makes it valuable for DevOps teams. Git's user-friendly nature and widespread adoption contribute to its effectiveness in various development environments.
  • "The best feature is that we can access it from anywhere if we have GitHub credentials."
  • "The tool's most valuable feature is branch workflows."
  • "Git is a powerful and mature tool that all software engineers use, whether they use it from the command line with the original version or integrate it with various tools. It helps by promoting collaboration and eliminating problems with code in separate locations. This greatly boosts productivity since you're not lost in a massive local repository, and everything remains organized."

Room for Improvement

Users suggest that Git needs a more user-friendly interface, better handling of merge conflicts, and improved tutorials for beginners. There are concerns about frequent updates causing issues and the complexity of setting up and using Git. Requests for enhanced security, more automated conflict resolution, and better synchronization are also notable. Additionally, improvements in pricing models, customization options, and documentation would be appreciated. Some users feel that proper management and standardization practices could help in navigating Git’s complexities.
  • "There is nothing that could be improved at this time."
  • "I believe there is room for improvement in preventing work loss due to conflicts or overwriting. Another area for improvement could be implementing features for automated code verification within Git."
  • "Some challenges arise when Git is not used correctly, particularly in managing branches. It's easy to get lost, but these challenges can be overcome with proper management. A common advice is maintaining the repository and ensuring developers are in sync with the production branch. Branches should be promptly merged into development to avoid getting lost in many branches."

ROI

Users have experienced a notable return on investment with Git, describing it as a good investment. Git's free version also receives high praise. The tool is valued for boosting productivity and saving time, with its widespread adoption highlighted. Git is seen as essential for modern software systems, ranking among the best available.

Pricing

Git is an open-source solution, eliminating licensing fees and hidden charges. Costs can vary based on use cases, with many using the free version. Some opt for GitLab's licensed version or subscription plans, which are considered affordable. Users with smaller bases often incur no charges. Pricing is viewed as inexpensive, with ratings ranging from 3 to 5 out of 10 on expense scales, making Git an economical choice for enterprises.
  • "I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."
  • "Git is an open-source software."
  • "The platform is less expensive."

Popular Use Cases

Git is used primarily for version control and collaboration in software development. Users clone repositories, create branches for new features, test changes locally, and push code to repositories like GitHub. It allows tracking changes, managing code versions, and storing code securely. Git supports both cloud and on-premise deployments, making it essential for projects involving multiple developers. The tool is also utilized for configuration management, research, and teaching, enhancing productivity and facilitating seamless code management.

Service and Support

Git support receives mixed feedback. Many find ample resources in online forums, community support, and quick fixes available on the internet. Some users rely on internal team members for setup and issue resolution. A few rate Git support services as satisfactory to good, with varying scores. Several users have not contacted Git’s technical support directly, preferring self-help through searches and community forums.

Deployment

Some found Git's initial setup complex and time-consuming, especially for automated deployments, while others experienced it as straightforward and quick, typically taking minutes. Many users highlighted that manual deployment is easier, but large projects might complicate the setup. Experiences varied based on prior knowledge and project requirements. Some utilized cloud-based versions requiring minimal setup. System familiarity made the process easier over time, with clear documentation aiding deployment.

Scalability

Git is highly scalable, comfortably handling multiple users. Companies report smooth scalability with user bases ranging from a few to thousands. It is rated between seven to ten for its scaling capabilities. While some users note challenges with large teams, many find it manages extensive collaborations well. Organizations with hundreds to thousands of users frequently use Git. It can expand easily and handle significant development projects.

Stability

Git is frequently praised for its stability, with many users rating it between eight to ten out of ten. Users report no bugs or crashes and appreciate its reliability. Periodic updates are mentioned but noted as a minor inconvenience. There is a strong consensus that Git performs effectively without issues, making it a highly stable tool.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Git Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise16
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business35
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise85
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
19%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Media Company
6%
Performing Arts
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
University
4%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Government
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Transportation Company
4%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Retailer
3%
Renewables & Environment Company
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Engineering Company
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Construction Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Non Tech Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Hospitality Company
1%

Compare Git with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Git

Git customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Related questions

  • 19
When evaluating Version Control, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 20
Why is Version Control important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Version Control

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Bitbucket vs Git Logo
Bitbucket vs Git
GitHub vs Git Logo
GitHub vs Git
Bitbucket Server vs Git Logo
Bitbucket Server vs Git
IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git Logo
IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git
Atlassian SourceTree vs Git Logo
Atlassian SourceTree vs Git
Liquibase vs Git Logo
Liquibase vs Git
DBmaestro Database Source Control vs Git Logo
DBmaestro Database Source Control vs Git
Helix Core vs Git Logo
Helix Core vs Git
Surround SCM vs Git Logo
Surround SCM vs Git
Apache Subversion vs Git Logo
Apache Subversion vs Git
Canonical Bazaar vs Git Logo
Canonical Bazaar vs Git
See all alternatives
 
Git Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Solution Architect at Danske5.0I use Git for code management, storing, and versioning, making it our standard tool for application and infrastructure development. Its central code repository feature with local branches is valuable, though I wish it had fewer updates.
Director - Technical Product Management at Visa4.0I use Git for version control and various pipeline and application development tasks. Its most valuable feature is version comparison. However, the dashboard could be improved to support customized reports, which we sometimes require in our company.
Head of Emerging Technologies at a construction company with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5I find Git's version control valuable for managing feature branches in our global development projects, despite the need for standardization to assist new users. Previously, I've used Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, and Azure DevOps for integration and hosting.
Azure DevOps Lead at DXC Technology4.0I use Git to download code from GitHub, make changes independently, and push updates back. I appreciate its merging features but wish it could resolve conflicts on the same line automatically. A GUI like Visual Studio Code would be beneficial.
Lead Technical Instructor at Code.Hub5.0I find Git essential for software development. It's powerful and boosts productivity by promoting collaboration and efficient code organization. However, effective branch management is crucial to avoid confusion. Despite this, Git's benefits far outweigh any challenges, making it indispensable.
Senior Engineer at Apexon4.5I primarily use Git for code repository and version control due to its performance, stability, and availability. While the ROI is good, I suggest a better pricing model for individuals. We switched to Git from SVN for its cloud capabilities.
Systems engineer at Expleogroup4.0As a student and at work, I use Git for version control, finding it accessible via terminal or GUI. However, synchronization and the initial setup can be complex. Despite this, its ease and functionality make it valuable for storing code and documents.
Software Engineer at Thomson Reuters International Pvt. Ltd.4.0I primarily use Git for version control to manage development versions and scripts, benefiting from its easy setup, stability, and reasonable pricing. Its features, like branch creation and repository access, enhance project management without any significant issues over the past year.