Git vs GitHub comparison

Git and GitHub are both solutions in the Version Control category. Git is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.9, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0. Git holds a 8.2% mindshare in VC, compared to GitHub’s 6.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Git users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Git

Read 38 Git reviews

1,105 Views
673 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 94 GitHub reviews

1,637 Views
680 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Git

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

GitHub and Git offer solutions in the version control systems category. GitHub holds an upper hand with its comprehensive collaboration tools and cloud-hosted capabilities, while Git provides robust version control with local development features.

Features: GitHub enhances collaboration with source code management, GitHub Actions for CI/CD, and integration with tools like Jenkins, offering advanced security and community-driven support for open-source projects. Git excels in simplicity for version control with Git Hooks and SSH keys, focusing on local development and effective incremental merging.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could improve by adding more DevOps tool integrations, enhancing security measures, and simplifying features for non-technical users. Git would benefit from a more advanced GUI, better merge conflict resolution, and a more intuitive user interface to broaden its reach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub operates primarily on the Public Cloud, offering scalable access, though support responsiveness is sometimes critiqued. Community support is strong. Git offers flexibility with deployment on various infrastructures, including on-premises, with reliable offline development and extensive documentation for independent problem-solving.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides both free and paid tiers with private repositories in the free plan, facing some licensing complexities. Git, being open-source, incurs no licensing fees, making it appealing to budget-conscious teams. Both systems offer strong ROI, with Git providing cost efficiency for managing codebases.

To learn more, read our detailed Git vs. GitHub Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Git is 8.2%, up from 8.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 6.5%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Hari Kathireshan

Sr PHP Developer at GE

An easy-to-use solution that can be used for configuration management

We use Git for configuration management Git is an easy-to-use solution that can be used for parallel working. Git's user interface could be improved. I have been using Git for almost eight years. Git is a stable solution. Git is a scalable solution. Around 2,000 users use the solution in our…

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Git is a powerful and mature tool that all software engineers use, whether they use it from the command line with the original version or integrate it with various tools. It helps by promoting collaboration and eliminating problems with code in separate locations. This greatly boosts productivity since you're not lost in a massive local repository, and everything remains organized."

"Git is easy to manage...It is helpful for me and easy to manage the interface we are using from development to production."

"The repository management and check-in/check-out commands are the most valuable features for ensuring secure code."

"The tool's most valuable feature is branch workflows."

"Git is an easy-to-use solution that can be used for parallel working."

"Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"I like Git's merging feature. For example, say there is an instance where I am working on the same code as another developer. Git automatically merges the work of two developers on the same file. If I'm working on line 50 and he's working on 60, and we both commit, it mergest automatically."

"Code versioning, for example, we work in the branch and want to come back to this branch another time.Git is a very useful tool, helpful to collaborate with other members in the group to finish more rapidly our work."

More Git pros

"If you want to share documents, you can create articles and diagrams with GitHub and share."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy but it is always good to connect with GitHub's team that manages APIs."

"The product has a good UI. It's simple and easy to access, and technical help is easily available. The two-factor authentication security is another valuable feature."

"The most valuable features are GitHub are the standard features, they are very useful."

"GitHub is very straightforward. I really appreciate the versioning capabilities, ease of use, and the ability to host code."

"We've found the technical support to be very helpful."

"This solution is very easy to use which I like about it. The capacity to own artifacts and share them with others is another good feature. You don't have to write all your code from scratch, you can use available templates and alter the code according to your needs."

"I did not have any issues with the stability of Github. It worked seamlessly."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"We would like to see tutorials added to the product, for new users to follow so that they can optimize their use of the solution."

"The UI can be more user-friendly."

"I would like to see less updates with the product."

"If other people are included in their project, you're going to have to make merge requests to merge the code you made, and the code your colleagues have made. So it's a little bit complicated."

"Git can improve the size of the depository it can handle and add the capability to detect the change between common files, such as Excel and PDF documents."

"It would be preferable if the updates could be completed at a faster pace."

"If another person raises a pull request under the same ID assigned to the previous person, and both parties modify the tool, their changes will be grouped together in the same request until it is closed, which is an issue."

"The UI can be more user-friendly."

More Git cons

"There is room for improvement in terms of interface."

"If it had all of the end-to-end integration, then we probably wouldn't have any doubts about what we have installed. However, at this point, we're still trying to figure out how to use it end-to-end."

"The documentation needs to be more concise and easier for developers to understand."

"The sign in process is a bit difficult."

"It is difficult to merge a code or restore it to an older version."

"We are not able to access GitHub from our VPN."

"It is currently only from the development perspective. It doesn't have features related to project management and testing. It is not like Azure. So, there is a lot of room for improvement. It is a version control product, and it would be good if they can come up with a complete DevOps product."

"The support team needs to have a well-defined SLA model since it is an area where the tool currently has some shortcomings."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the open-source version."

"The platform is less expensive."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"Git is an open-source software."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."

More Git pricing and cost advice

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"The product is reasonably priced."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 38% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 16% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 12% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

More Git Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Git

June 2025

Download Git product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

June 2025

Download GitHub product report

Overview

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Git

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

June 2025

Free Report: Git vs. GitHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Git vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Git vs. GitHub report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.