Git vs GitHub comparison

Git and GitHub are both solutions in the Version Control category. Git is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. Git holds a 7.9% mindshare in VC, compared to GitHub’s 6.0% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Git users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Git

Read 38 Git reviews

1,290 Views
1,111 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,060 Views
908 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Git

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

GitHub and Git offer solutions in the version control systems category. GitHub holds an upper hand with its comprehensive collaboration tools and cloud-hosted capabilities, while Git provides robust version control with local development features.

Features: GitHub enhances collaboration with source code management, GitHub Actions for CI/CD, and integration with tools like Jenkins, offering advanced security and community-driven support for open-source projects. Git excels in simplicity for version control with Git Hooks and SSH keys, focusing on local development and effective incremental merging.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could improve by adding more DevOps tool integrations, enhancing security measures, and simplifying features for non-technical users. Git would benefit from a more advanced GUI, better merge conflict resolution, and a more intuitive user interface to broaden its reach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub operates primarily on the Public Cloud, offering scalable access, though support responsiveness is sometimes critiqued. Community support is strong. Git offers flexibility with deployment on various infrastructures, including on-premises, with reliable offline development and extensive documentation for independent problem-solving.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides both free and paid tiers with private repositories in the free plan, facing some licensing complexities. Git, being open-source, incurs no licensing fees, making it appealing to budget-conscious teams. Both systems offer strong ROI, with Git providing cost efficiency for managing codebases.

To learn more, read our detailed Git vs. GitHub Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Git is 7.9%, down from 8.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 6.0%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Srujan Panuganti

Scientist - Instrument II at AbbVie

An excellent open source, software hosting solution that provides strong version control functionality and a user-friendly interface

We use this solution to host our software, and where we need to develop new features and new functionality, we create new branch from our existing software, work on our branch, develop it, test it, validate it, and then merge it with the master or main software The best thing about this solution…

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Git is a powerful and mature tool that all software engineers use, whether they use it from the command line with the original version or integrate it with various tools. It helps by promoting collaboration and eliminating problems with code in separate locations. This greatly boosts productivity since you're not lost in a massive local repository, and everything remains organized."

"The repository management and check-in/check-out commands are the most valuable features for ensuring secure code."

"The setup process is pretty simple."

"The most valuable feature of Git is its ability to track updates, such as firmware documentation. Additionally, many people can make changes to code without problems. It is able to solve conflicts very easily."

"Git is easy to use."

"We use the tool to store codes."

"I like Git's merging feature. For example, say there is an instance where I am working on the same code as another developer. Git automatically merges the work of two developers on the same file. If I'm working on line 50 and he's working on 60, and we both commit, it mergest automatically."

"Git is an easy-to-use solution that can be used for parallel working."

More Git pros

"The most valuable feature is the fact that it's cloud-based, and we don't have to manage an on-premises server to use it."

"We can make a private repository."

"All the features are valuable, but the most important feature is that GitHub has advanced security. The second important feature is the capability to create custom GitHub actions and the capability to deploy in different types of architectural infrastructures, such as hybrid, private, or public."

"The product helps our team collaborate across different locations."

"It provides Draft Pull Requests for review purposes without needing immediate merging and GitHub Actions for CI/CD implementation."

"This product allows us to easily collaborate on development tasks with our subcontractors, and control the workflow as the project progresses."

"I find GitHub very user friendly."

"The product has a good UI. It's simple and easy to access, and technical help is easily available. The two-factor authentication security is another valuable feature."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"About the configuration it is a little bit difficult, it can be improved."

"The product needs to improve its UI."

"The platform could have a feature for monitoring data recovery similar to Azure."

"If another person raises a pull request under the same ID assigned to the previous person, and both parties modify the tool, their changes will be grouped together in the same request until it is closed, which is an issue."

"Git is mostly command based and needs to have a helpful user interface."

"Synchronization could be better. Sometimes when you create a branch and merge it into another branch, I think it's a bit complex for no reason. The initial setup is also tricky when you do it for the first time."

"Some challenges arise when Git is not used correctly, particularly in managing branches. It's easy to get lost, but these challenges can be overcome with proper management. A common advice is maintaining the repository and ensuring developers are in sync with the production branch. Branches should be promptly merged into development to avoid getting lost in many branches."

"New developers sometimes find it difficult to call a review or create a request."

More Git cons

"They're improving the work items to track the progress of the team, but in my experience, Azure DevOps is better in this functionality. GitHub needs to improve the form to track the progress of the work done by a team."

"The GitHub repository needs an upgraded user interface and overall UI improvements."

"GitHub could have better integration or capability with other solutions."

"One area for improvement in GitHub could be integration with other tools, such as test management or project management tools."

"I would like to see integration with Slack such that all of the changes made in GitHub are reflected there."

"The descriptions within Github could be more user-friendly to show the trees of Gitflow."

"Lacks sufficient support in terms of professional services that could be provided."

"Could be more user friendly."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"Git is completely free."

"The tool is free."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."

"The platform is less expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

More Git pricing and cost advice

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 36% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 16% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 14% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

More Git Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Git

April 2025

Download Git product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

April 2025

Download GitHub product report

Overview

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Git

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

April 2025

Free Report: Git vs. GitHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Git vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Git vs. GitHub report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.