Git vs GitHub comparison

Git and GitHub are both solutions in the Version Control category. Git is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.0, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0. Git holds a 9.5% mindshare in VC, compared to GitHub’s 7.6% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Git users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Git

Read 38 Git reviews

1,073 Views
1,073 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 94 GitHub reviews

3,809 Views
1,524 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Git

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

GitHub and Git compete in the version control and collaboration tools category. GitHub has the upper hand due to its extensive community support, collaboration tools, and integration capabilities.

Features: GitHub is renowned for its community support, collaboration tools like pull requests and branching, and integration with tools such as Jira, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps. Git offers straightforward version control, effective branch and merge conflict management, and supports both CLI and GUI operations.

Room for Improvement: GitHub needs to enhance its security features, improve integration with automation tools, and simplify interface complexities for non-technical users. Git requires a more user-friendly interface and improved branch management standardization. Both platforms struggle with large file handling and AI tool integration for automation and security analysis.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is mainly cloud-based with hybrid and on-premises options and has a robust community although official support can be hit or miss. Git is commonly used in private infrastructures and relies on open-source support. Both could benefit from more direct and professional support.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers free public usage and tiered plans for private projects, though licensing complexities exist. Git is open-source and cost-effective with straightforward ROI. GitHub's pricing is reasonable, offering enhanced features at a premium compared to Git's free model.

To learn more, read our detailed Git vs. GitHub Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,155 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Git is 9.5%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 7.6%, up from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Hari Kathireshan

Sr PHP Developer at GE

An easy-to-use solution that can be used for configuration management

We use Git for configuration management Git is an easy-to-use solution that can be used for parallel working. Git's user interface could be improved. I have been using Git for almost eight years. Git is a stable solution. Git is a scalable solution. Around 2,000 users use the solution in our…

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Git's learning curve is shallow, making the solution easy to use after a few tutorials."

"The features I am most impressed by is the automation."

"I like that it's easy to use and because it's accessible from a terminal or a graphical user interface if needed. I also like that we can pass comments from Linux if required."

"The most valuable feature of Git is its reliability and user popularity."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the branch management functionality."

"All of the features in Git are useful."

"Git is an easy-to-use solution that can be used for parallel working."

"The most valuable feature of Git is its ability to track updates, such as firmware documentation. Additionally, many people can make changes to code without problems. It is able to solve conflicts very easily."

More Git pros

"The Projects Tab, which shows you the todo list and the progress for projects, is very helpful."

"The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code."

"A great feature is being able to have different repositories and different kinds of projects in a single solution at a single time. It's just a click away."

"The versioning of the code and the tracking of changes are definitely some of my top features."

"Any complex banking can be handled very easily in GitHub. It allows us to integrate with tools like Grid, where we can merge and resolve conflicts without any hassle."

"GitHub have a built-in software application development environment and this has been most useful."

"I recommend using GitHub because it is reliable and helpful for developers."

"The product helps our team collaborate across different locations."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"Git is mostly command based and needs to have a helpful user interface."

"Synchronization could be better. Sometimes when you create a branch and merge it into another branch, I think it's a bit complex for no reason. The initial setup is also tricky when you do it for the first time."

"The platform could have a feature for monitoring data recovery similar to Azure."

"The scalability could be better. I think it requires some discipline to have large teams working on the same project without facing problems merging code. I'm using Git for personal projects, but I know companies face merge conflicts when more than one person is working on code simultaneously."

"If the solution could provide more language support options such as Korean, it would be helpful."

"I would like to see less updates with the product."

"The product needs to improve its UI."

"New developers sometimes find it difficult to call a review or create a request."

More Git cons

"The merging features can be improved."

"The integration with Visual Studio Code could be more streamlined."

"The GUI design is poor, so I exclusively use the CLI, which is much easier to use and understand. It would be great to see the GUI updated to be more user-friendly."

"I faced one or two breakdowns. That said, they lasted only for a few seconds or a minute."

"The initial setup and implementation could be easier, I had some difficulties with it at first but I don't have a development background."

"I would like a more graphical, user-friendly UI, to avoid writing so much code on cmd."

"This solution could be improved if migration was fully automated to make it easy, for example, to migrate repositories into GitHub."

"GitHub could automate the setup process more, such as creating YAML files for GitHub Actions."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"Git is an open-source software."

"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"We use the open-source version."

"Git is completely free."

More Git pricing and cost advice

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"I use the free version of GitHub."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 40% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 15% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 12% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 9% of the time

More Git Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Git

July 2025

Download Git product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

July 2025

Download GitHub product report

Overview

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Git

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

July 2025

Free Report: Git vs. GitHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Git vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Git vs. GitHub report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.