Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Git vs GitHub comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Git
Ranking in Version Control
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
GitHub
Ranking in Version Control
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
95
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Git is 10.0%, up from 7.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 8.0%, up from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
GitHub8.0%
Git10.0%
Other82.0%
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Grazvydas Govaras - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps to store and version the code
We use the solution for code management to store and version the code. It is the standard service we use for developing applications and infrastructure services You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.  I would like to see less updates with the product.  I…
Kamalanadha Reddy - PeerSpot reviewer
Improved deployment pipeline visibility with generally good support
My primary use case involves working with GitHub for code management. I have extensive experience using it for various tasks, such as creating repositories, managing pull requests, and utilizing GitHub Actions for automating workflows GitHub contributes to efficient project management by…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I like Git's merging feature. For example, say there is an instance where I am working on the same code as another developer. Git automatically merges the work of two developers on the same file. If I'm working on line 50 and he's working on 60, and we both commit, it mergest automatically."
"You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches."
"The implementation is easy."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Since I am a very simple user of the tool, its scalability is good for me."
"The most valuable feature of Git is its reliability and user popularity."
"The best thing about this solution is that it can be learned very quickly, and used very easily."
"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."
"Git is easy to use."
"The most valuable aspects of GitHub are version control and parallel development. I also appreciate the forking part, which allows us to release a specific set of features to the environment."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The ease of use is valuable."
"This product is very good for storing and versioning code."
"We use GitHub instead of our regular shared drive. It offers instant access to shared folders as well as good security."
"The solution is scalable."
"Our code is secure."
"GitHub is convenient and easy to use."
 

Cons

"Synchronization could be better. Sometimes when you create a branch and merge it into another branch, I think it's a bit complex for no reason. The initial setup is also tricky when you do it for the first time."
"New developers sometimes find it difficult to call a review or create a request."
"The solution could improve by having more customization."
"The UI can be more user-friendly."
"More security is always welcome in my opinion."
"The scalability could be better. I think it requires some discipline to have large teams working on the same project without facing problems merging code. I'm using Git for personal projects, but I know companies face merge conflicts when more than one person is working on code simultaneously."
"The GUI needs to be improved."
"The main problem for me is the frequent upgrades in the solution because every other upgrade is a minefield. When you do the upgrade, there is always something that doesn't work."
"The support team needs to have a well-defined SLA model since it is an area where the tool currently has some shortcomings."
"I would want to see some form of code security scanning implemented."
"It is difficult to merge a code or restore it to an older version."
"We would like this solution to have a more user-friendly interface."
"The sign in process is a bit difficult."
"The ticketing system is not working."
"I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity."
"Github needs more storage."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."
"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."
"Git is an open-source software."
"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."
"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."
"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."
"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."
"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."
"The product is reasonably priced."
"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."
"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."
"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."
"The private repositories are free, which is very good."
"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."
"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."
"The price of this solution is reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
17%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise21
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business42
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise48
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Git?
You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.
What needs improvement with Git?
There is nothing that could be improved at this time.
What do you like most about GitHub?
The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?
I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.
What needs improvement with GitHub?
Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse
Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent
Find out what your peers are saying about Git vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.