We performed a comparison between Git and Liquibase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Git and others in Version Control."All of the features in Git are useful."
"The implementation is easy."
"Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The product protects our data."
"I believe it is beneficial to maintain a detailed log or history of who did what to a project and which user committed to the change."
"I use the solution for website management."
"The product is easy to use."
"I like Git's merging feature. For example, say there is an instance where I am working on the same code as another developer. Git automatically merges the work of two developers on the same file. If I'm working on line 50 and he's working on 60, and we both commit, it mergest automatically."
"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."
"Git is mostly command based and needs to have a helpful user interface."
"I would like to see an improvement in the way the product owner can review changes."
"If the file changes are on the same line, we need to resolve a merge conflict manually. Let's say there is a merge conflict on line 50 because we have multiple commits on the same line number. Git could add some artificial intelligence to resolve the conflict automatically."
"The scalability could be better. I think it requires some discipline to have large teams working on the same project without facing problems merging code. I'm using Git for personal projects, but I know companies face merge conflicts when more than one person is working on code simultaneously."
"The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter."
"I would like to see less updates with the product."
"More security is always welcome in my opinion."
"In our company, we sometimes feel the need to have certain kinds of reports, but we never get those customized reports in Git's dashboard."
"The pricing is quite high."
Earn 20 points
Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 35 reviews while Liquibase is ranked 7th in Version Control. Git is rated 8.6, while Liquibase is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Liquibase writes "A unique product that is easy to implement, with great automation capabilities ". Git is most compared with Atlassian SourceTree, Canonical Bazaar, IBM Rational ClearCase, Surround SCM and Bitbucket, whereas Liquibase is most compared with Bitbucket and DBmaestro Database Source Control.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
