We performed a comparison between Trend Vision One - Cloud Security and Veracode based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints."
"The storage and computing features are valuable."
"I like the conformity and workload security modules. Workload security is all about intrusion detection and prevention. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has behavioral rules that are auto-populated based on organizational structure. That's one aspect that we liked most."
"The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight."
"Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"Code analysis tool to help identify code issues before entered into production."
"Within SCA, there is an extremely valuable feature called vulnerable methods. It is able to determine within a vulnerable library which methods are vulnerable. That is very valuable, because in the vast majority of cases where a library is vulnerable, none of the vulnerable methods are actually used by the code. So, if we want to prioritize the way open source libraries are updated when a library is found vulnerable, then we want to prioritize the libraries which have vulnerable methods used within the code."
"Scanning of .war and .jar is key for us."
"Veracode does not require any maintenance."
"The best feature of Veracode is that we can do static and dynamic scans."
"The best feature is definitely the detailed reports. It provides code-related queries in the order of high, medium, and low depending on what we need to do. Veracode is user-friendly as well."
"Veracode's technical support is great. They assigned us a TAM and once a week, we have a brief engagement with the TAM to verify that everything's going well. If we have any outstanding issues, they get serviced and addressed."
"The capability to identify vulnerable code is the most valuable feature of Veracode."
"The licensing model could be improved. To gain full coverage, you need to spend more to buy subscriptions for each kind of service they offer. It will start to be pricey if you want full coverage."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
"The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent."
"One area for improvement in Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is marketing; in particular, Trend Vision should update the marketing documentation. The information needs to be more comprehensive."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
"Documentation on cloud architecture and job architecture would be helpful."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
"Veracode's ability to fix flaws is less sophisticated than that of its competitors."
"The reporting was detailed, but there were some things that were missing. It showed us on which line an error was found, but it could have been more detailed."
"Veracode has plenty of data. The problem is the information on the dashboards of Veracode, as the user interface is not great. It's not immediately usable. Most of the time, the best way to use it is to just create issues and put them in JIRA... But if I were a startup, and only had products with a good user interface, I wouldn't use Veracode because the UI is very dated."
"The scanning process for records could be faster and there is room for improvement in Veracode's performance."
"The sandbox could use some improvement; when creating a sandbox, it requires us to put the application name in twice, which seems unnecessary."
"When it comes to the speed of the pipeline scan, one of the things we have found with Veracode is that it's very fast with Java-based applications but a bit slow with C/C++ based applications. So we have implemented the pipeline scan only for Java-based applications not for the C/C++ applications."
"The UI is not user-friendly and can be improved."
"Some features could be improved in terms of user-friendliness."
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 7th in Container Security with 17 reviews while Veracode is ranked 4th in Container Security with 194 reviews. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6, while Veracode is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veracode writes "Helps to reduce false positives and prevent vulnerable code from entering production, but does not support incremental scanning ". Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Orca Security, whereas Veracode is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx One, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and OWASP Zap. See our Trend Vision One - Cloud Security vs. Veracode report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors and best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
