Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] comparison

Sonar and Black Duck are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while Black Duck is ranked #46. Sonar holds a 20.3% mindshare in SAST, compared to Black Duck’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Sonar users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Black Duck users who would recommend it.
SonarQube Server (formerly ...
Read 117 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews
  • 40,838 Views
  • 30,220 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
Synopsys API Security Testi...
Read 1 Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] review
  • 346 Views
  • 249 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

SonarQube Server and Synopsys API Security Testing are competing products in software quality and security management. Synopsys API Security Testing leads with its comprehensive API security testing capabilities, while SonarQube is preferred for its pricing and support.

Features: SonarQube Server focuses on code quality analysis, offering detailed reports and integration with development workflows. It provides code vulnerability detection, supports multiple programming languages, and has active directory integration. Synopsys API Security Testing focuses on API security, equipped to uncover vulnerabilities across API endpoints. It features automated API security scans, dynamic application security testing (DAST) capabilities, and integration with popular CI/CD tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube Server is known for its straightforward deployment and effective customer support, ensuring easy integration into systems. Synopsys API Security Testing, despite offering extensive support, can be complex to deploy due to advanced configuration requirements. SonarQube's setup is user-friendly, while Synopsys caters to complex organizational needs.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube Server is cost-effective with a notable ROI, appealing to teams focused on code quality. Synopsys API Security Testing has a higher upfront cost but provides substantial ROI with its advanced security features. SonarQube is affordable compared to Synopsys's investment in cutting-edge API security.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: August 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
August 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SonarQube Server (formerly ...
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
117
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)
Synopsys API Security Testi...
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
46th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 20.3%, down from 27.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)20.3%
Synopsys API Security Testing0.2%
Other79.5%
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Sthembiso Zondi - PeerSpot reviewer
Consistent improvements in code quality and security with effective integration and reliable technical support
The features of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) that I find most useful are the suggestions received from reviewing the code. When they review the code, they provide suggestions on how to fix it, and we find those very useful from a development perspective. We use SonarQube Server's (formerly SonarQube) centralized management and visualization of code quality metrics on the dashboard because that's the executive dashboard that we send to the executives to show where we are in terms of quality, security, and where the company can improve. We use that for organizational improvement purposes. The ability to tailor metrics tracking in SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) has been beneficial to my team. There are team-specific dashboards which are related to specific repositories they utilize, and we have that aggregative dashboard that shows the whole organization's performance. We can drill down per specific repository, which makes it easier for the team to improve specific things.
Read full review
UmarQureshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful threat vectors, beneficial results, but implementation needed support
We are using Synopsys API Security Testing for scanning APIs for risks and vulnerabilities and to understand our posture before deployment within our business The most valuable features of Synopsys API Security Testing are the metrics, results, and threat vectors that it shares. I have been…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is an easy tool that you can deploy and configure. After that you can measure the history of your obligation and integrate it with other tools like GitLab or GitHub or Azure DevOps to do quality code analysis."
"Improve the code coverage and evaluates the technical steps and percentage of code being resolved."
"The product itself has a friendly UI."
"We have the software metrics that SonarQube gives us, which is something we did not have before. This helps us work towards aiming coding standards to empower us to move in the direction of better code quality. SonarQube provides targets and metrics for that."
"There are many options and examples available in the tool that help us fix the issues it shows us."
"SonarQube is useful for controlling all of our Azure task tracking and scanning."
"Issue Explanations: Documentation with detailed samples. Helps in growing technical knowledge and re-writing logic to conforming solutions."
"The product is simple."
More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros
"The most valuable features of Synopsys API Security Testing are the metrics, results, and threat vectors that it shares."
 

Cons

"During the setup process, we only had one issue related to the number of available files. To perform the analysis, you have quite a lot of available file handles, so we had to increase that limit."
"The scanning part could be improved in SonarQube. We have used Coverity for scanning, and we have the critical issues reported by Coverity. When we used SonarQube for scanning and looked at the results, it seems that some of them have incorrect input. This part can be improved for C and C++ languages."
"There isn't a very good enterprise report."
"There are limitations to the free version that limit development options as far as languages."
"The pricing could be reduced a bit. It's a little expensive."
"We've been using the Community Edition, which means that we get to use it at our leisure, and they're kind enough to literally give it to us. However, it takes a fair amount of effort to figure out how to get everything up and running. Since we didn't go with the professional paid version, we're not entitled to support. Of course that could be self-correcting if we were to make the step to buy into this and really use it. Then their technical support would be available to us to make strides for using it better."
"I have found this solution creates more noise than competitors."
"From a reporting perspective, we sometimes have problems interpreting the vulnerability scan reports. For example, if it finds a possible threat, our analysts have to manually check the provided reports, and sometimes we have issues getting all the data needed to properly verify if it's accurate or not."
More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons
"The solution required us to use our team and we spoke to Synopsys API Security Testing's support to do the implementation. We use two people from our team for the implementation. and one person for maintenance."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the open-source community version, but there are enterprise licenses available."
"It's an open-source product."
"The development license cost is reasonable, and we've had no concerns about SonarQube when it comes to cost."
"There is both a free and licensed version. The free version has limitations on development languages and support."
"I requested this license for one million lines of code and they accepted this."
"The product’s price is lower than Veracode’s price."
"The developer edition is based on cost per lines of code."
"Some of the plugins that were previously free are not free now."
More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Government
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business32
Midsize Enterprise21
Large Enterprise75
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?
I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...
See all answers
Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?
SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...
See all answers
How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?
We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 18% of the time
Coverity Static vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
Coverity Static vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 10% of the time
GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 10% of the time
Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 6% of the time
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 6% of the time
More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
August 2025
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reportDownload SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
August 2025
Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] reportDownload Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

Sonar
No data available
 

Overview

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?
  • Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
  • Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
  • Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
  • CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
  • Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.
What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?
  • Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
  • Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
  • Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
  • Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sonar

AppSec testing optimized for the needs of API developers
APIs provide open, flexible interfaces that enable applications and services to talk to each other. But these characteristics can also make it difficult to build secure software—and even more difficult for traditional AppSec tools to test it.

Black Duck
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
August 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: August 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.