Sitecore Digital Marketing System vs Teradata comparison

Sitecore Digital Marketing ...

Read 76 Teradata reviews

248 Views
195 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Sitecore Digital Marketing System and Teradata compete in the digital marketing and data management domain. Sitecore leads in content management and personalization, while Teradata is stronger in data integration.

Features:Sitecore provides content personalization, marketing automation, and customer insights. Teradata offers advanced analytics, data warehousing, and seamless integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Sitecore features streamlined deployment with integrated solutions and responsive support. Teradata's deployment is more technical, requiring specialized resources but includes comprehensive enterprise support.

Pricing and ROI:Sitecore has moderate setup costs, offering good ROI through enhanced customer engagement tools. Teradata's initial costs can be higher but deliver substantial ROI for extensive data capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Sitecore Digital Marketing System vs. Teradata Report (Updated: May 2025).

Sitecore Digital Marketing System vs. Teradata

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,471 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Sitecore Digital Marketing ...

Ranking in Marketing Management

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Teradata

Ranking in Marketing Management

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Customer Experience Management (6th), Backup and Recovery (20th), Data Integration (17th), Relational Databases Tools (8th), Data Warehouse (3rd), BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (10th), Cloud Data Warehouse (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Marketing Management category, the mindshare of Sitecore Digital Marketing System is 0.8%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Teradata is 3.6%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Marketing Management

Featured Reviews

Venugopal Kulasekaran

Product Delivery Manager at Infosys

Advanced features and personalization improve content management experience

Sitecore Digital Marketing System ( /products/sitecore-digital-marketing-system-reviews ) is a standout tool because it offers cloud capabilities and numerous built-in features, including AI components. Its advanced search options facilitate content creators in locating content efficiently. Additionally, the system allows for personalization based on customer profiles, altering page content according to demographics.

Read full review

SurjitChoudhury

Data engineer at Cocos pt

Offers seamless integration capabilities and performance optimization features, including extensive indexing and advanced tuning capabilities

We created and constructed the warehouse. We used multiple loading processes like MultiLoad, FastLoad, and Teradata Pump. But those are loading processes, and Teradata is a powerful tool because if we consider older technologies, its architecture with nodes, virtual processes, and nodes is a unique concept. Later, other technologies like Informatica also adopted the concept of nodes from Informatica PowerCenter version 7.x. Previously, it was a client-server architecture, but later, it changed to the nodes concept. Like, we can have the database available 24/7, 365 days. If one node fails, other nodes can take care of it. Informatica adopted all those concepts when it changed its architecture. Even Oracle databases have since adapted their architecture to them. However, this particular Teradata company initially started with its own different type of architecture, which major companies later adopted. It has grown now, but initially, whatever query we sent it would be mapped into a particular component. After that, it goes to the virtual processor and down to the disk, where the actual physical data is loaded. So, in between, there's a map, which acts like a data dictionary. It also holds information about each piece of data, where it's loaded, and on which particular virtual processor or node the data resides. Because Teradata comes with a four-node architecture, or however many nodes we choose, the cost is determined by that initially. So, what type of data does each and every node hold? It's a shared-no architecture. So, whatever task is given to a virtual processor it will be processed. If there's a failure, then it will be taken care of by another virtual processor. Moreover, this solution has impacted the query time and data performance. In Teradata, there's a lot of joining, partitioning, and indexing of records. There are primary and secondary indexes, hash indexing, and other indexing processes. To improve query performance, we first analyze the query and tune it. If a join needs a secondary index, which plays a major role in filtering records, we might reconstruct that particular table with the secondary index. This tuning involves partitioning and indexing. We use these tools and technologies to fine-tune performance. When it comes to integration, tools like Informatica seamlessly connect with Teradata. We ensure the Teradata database is configured correctly in Informatica, including the proper hostname and properties for the load process. We didn't find any major complexity or issues with integration. But, these technologies are quite old now. With newer big data technologies, we've worked with a four-layer architecture, pulling data from Hadoop Lake to Teradata. We configure Teradata with the appropriate hostname and credentials, and use BTEQ queries to load data. Previously, we converted the data warehouse to a CLD model as per Teradata's standardized procedures, moving from an ETL to an EMT process. This allowed us to perform gap analysis on missing entities based on the model and retrieve them from the source system again. We found Teradata integration straightforward and compatible with other tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform’s most valuable feature is the ability to create web pages with ease."

"Improved performance of ETL procedures, reporting."

"It's a pre-configured appliance that requires very little in terms of setting-up."

"It has reduced a lot of reworking on maintaining indexes, partitions, etc."

"It is quick, secure, and has less hassles because we don't have to involve our networking team, infrastructure, etc. It is very easy to deploy and make market ready."

"The most valuable feature of Teradata is the quick processing of large data."

"The most valuable feature is the ease of running queries."

"The most valuable feature is the ease of uploading data from multiple sources."

"The ability to handle machine data parallel processing is the most valuable feature of Teradata."

More Teradata pros

Cons

"In a few scenarios, Sitecore DMS works slowly."

"I'm not sure about the unstructured data management capabilities. It could be improved."

"Their level of technical support is adequate. It could be better."

"There is some improvement required on OLTP level and some analytical function is missing."

"We tried to use case Teradata for a data warehouse system, but we had some problems in relation to the Teradata system, CDC tools, and source databases. We were unable to transfer data from HPE Integrity mainframe to Teradata."

"Sometimes the large injestion takes days to load data, and some of our stored procedures take two to three days."

"Data ingestion is done via external utilities and not by the query language itself. It would be more convenient to have that functionality within its SQL dialect."

"The primary challenge with Teradata lies in its cost structure, encompassing subscription fees, software licenses, and hardware expenses."

"They should add more connectors to different platforms."

More Teradata cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for Teradata IntelliFlex, which is very expensive."

"The tool costs about 30,000 euros a month, while Azure Synapse SQL only costs 10,000."

"It is still a very expensive solution. While I very much like the pure technological supremacy of the software itself, I believe Teradata as a company needs to become more affordable. They are already losing the market to more flexible or cheaper competitors."

"It's a very expensive product."

"Teradata's licensing is on the expensive side."

"Teradata is a very expensive solution."

"Make sure you have the in-house skills to design and support the solution, as relying on external sources is extremely costly and tends to lock you into specific platforms, tools, and paradigms."

"The price of Teradata could be less expensive."

More Teradata pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Marketing Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,471 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user232068

Senior Data Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 5, 2015

Netezza vs. Teradata

Original published at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-i-choose-net Two leading Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) architectures for Data Warehousing (DW) are IBM PureData System for Analytics (formerly Netezza) and Teradata. I thought talking about the similarities and differences…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Sitecore Digital Marketing System?

The platform’s most valuable feature is the ability to create web pages with ease.

What needs improvement with Sitecore Digital Marketing System?

Sitecore Digital Marketing System can be improved by incorporating more AI capabilities. AI should assist in generating appropriate content automatically and enhancing searches, such as locating sp...

What is your primary use case for Sitecore Digital Marketing System?

I primarily use Sitecore Digital Marketing System ( /products/sitecore-digital-marketing-system-reviews ) for content creation and management. This includes handling text, videos, and images displa...

Comparing Teradata and Oracle Database, which product do you think is better and why?

I have spoken to my colleagues about this comparison and in our collective opinion, the reason why some people may declare Teradata better than Oracle is the pricing. Both solutions are quite simi...

Which companies use Teradata and who is it most suitable for?

Before my organization implemented this solution, we researched which big brands were using Teradata, so we knew if it would be compatible with our field. According to the product's site, the comp...

Is Teradata a difficult solution to work with?

Teradata is not a difficult product to work with, especially since they offer you technical support at all levels if you just ask. There are some features that may cause difficulties - for example,...

Oracle Exadata vs Teradata

Comparisons

No data available

Compared 13% of the time

SQL Server vs Teradata

Compared 10% of the time

Snowflake vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Teradata

Compared 6% of the time

MySQL vs Teradata

Compared 6% of the time

More Teradata Competitors

Product Reports

Download Sitecore Digital Marketing System product report

Marketing Management

May 2025

Sitecore Digital Marketing System report

Download Teradata product report

April 2025

Also Known As

No data available

IntelliFlex, Aster Data Map Reduce, , QueryGrid, Customer Interaction Manager, Digital Marketing Center, Data Mover, Data Stream Architecture

Overview

The Sitecore Digital Marketing System (DMS) is a way for marketers to manage content, analytics, personalization, automation, email and testing within a single interface and leverage all of the data within one location. Sitecore DMS allows marketers to focus on what's most important - focusing on strategic investments and evaluating their success based on ROI - and bypass factors slowing them down - multiple platform maintenance and subscription fees.

Sitecore

Teradata is a scalable data analytics platform designed to meet enterprise demands for large-scale data management and processing, focusing on performance, scalability, and security for complex query executions.

As a leading data warehousing solution, Teradata integrates advanced analytics enabling organizations to derive insights from massive datasets. It supports high-volume data workloads with its architecture optimized for analytical queries. Users benefit from its robust scalability, allowing seamless expansion as data grows. Teradata's SQL engine is compatible with a wide range of data types, ensuring flexibility in data analysis. With advanced security measures, it protects sensitive data across various environments, providing peace of mind to users handling critical information.

What are the most important features of Teradata?

Linear Scalability: Easily expands data processing capabilities to handle increasing data loads without performance degradation.
Advanced Analytics: Supports complex analytical operations integrating machine learning and AI for predictive insights.
SQL Compatibility: Offers a comprehensive SQL interface that supports complex queries across diverse data types.
Data Security: Implements rigorous security protocols to protect data integrity and confidentiality.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Decision-Making: Derive actionable insights quickly for strategic business decisions.
Cost Efficiency: Optimized resource usage reduces operational costs associated with data processing.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined data operations save time, allowing teams to focus on analysis.
Enhanced Scalability: Seamless growth without significant additional investment as data volumes increase.

Teradata is widely used in industries like finance, telecommunications, and healthcare, where data-driven decisions are critical. Companies leverage its robust analytics capabilities to enhance customer experiences, streamline operations, and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. In these sectors, quick access to data insights can significantly impact competitive advantage.

Sample Customers

easyJet, Panasonic, Oxfam, Jabra, Graf von Faber-Castell, Boy Scouts of America, eQ Asset Management, Zurich Group International, YouSee

Netflix