We compared Siebel CRM and Zoho CRM across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: Siebel CRM is known for its strength and adaptability. Users like its ready-made industry verticals and comprehensive workflows. Zoho CRM receives acclaim for its intuitive interface, customizable choices, cost-effectiveness, and extensive features.
Room for Improvement: Siebel CRM users say could be simpler and more customizable customization guidance, user interface, mobile app, support, backend performance, and cost reduction. Zoho CRM users said the mobile app could be simpler and that Zoho could improve its data organization and automation.
Service and Support: Some customers appreciated Siebel’s advanced support, while others were dissatisfied with slow response times and had difficulty contacting the support team. Zoho CRM generally offers good customer service, with responsive support during regular business hours. However, some users had mixed experiences with knowledge and availability.
Ease of Deployment: Users have reported that the initial setup process for Siebel CRM is challenging. Zoho CRM's setup process differs in terms of complexity and time required. While some users found it straightforward, others mentioned that it took a significant amount of time, ranging from weeks to months.
Pricing: Customers find the setup cost of Siebel CRM to be expensive and a cause for concern. Zoho CRM is praised for its affordable pricing, being seen as competitive and reasonable. Customers appreciate the cost-effectiveness of using Zoho CRM in the cloud, which eliminates the need for hardware investment.
ROI: Siebel CRM provides distinct features that are not found in other CRMs, resulting in a favorable return on investment. Zoho CRM enhances productivity and effectiveness, minimizing the requirement for extra personnel and leading to a positive return on investment.
Comparison Results: Siebel CRM is highly regarded for its versatility and ability to accommodate a diverse user base. At the same time, it’s also criticized for its complicated setup, and users say the interface is difficult to navigate. Zoho CRM is commended for its simplicity and intuitive interface. It is more cost-effective and offers more features than many competing solutions. However, users have said Zoho’s scalability and customization options are limited.
"Siebel CRM's most beneficial aspects are the workflows. It has complete holistic workflows for a customer management system."
"The solution's order management pack is quite fantastic."
"Due to the many features that are built in from a CRM perspective, it is the best product we have."
"It is quite robust and flexible. You can develop almost anything you want. You go into the tools, and you can do anything you want."
"Siebel CRM is used for distributing information between systems, trouble ticketing, and case management."
"Siebel is easy to configure and comes with various pre-built industry verticals, so it doesn't require much effort. If you want to roll out Siebel in telecom or manufacturing, they have the verticals."
"Siebel offers a high level of customization which has been valuable. The solution also offers the ability to model complex products."
"Siebel CRM has a strong database model, workflow and integration tools."
"The most valuable features are the lead, opportunity and task management as well as dashboard creation, reporting, contact management and campaigns."
"I think the whole pipeline tracking is most useful for us."
"I am impressed with the product's information on customers."
"I like Zoho CRM's automatic lead assignment and automated workflows."
"There's no installation required."
"The most valuable features include the dashboards, deal tracking, email tracking, notes, managing notes and the ability to manage databases in one place."
"The most valuable solution of Zoho CRM is lead management and analytics. It has a powerful analytics tool."
"The initial setup is pretty fast."
"The problem with Siebel is that everything is customizable in it. It's probably over-engineered, which makes it difficult to use, and it makes it difficult for the users to get started with the system."
"However, there are areas that this product has not evolved at par with global industry trends, including the UX/UI and cloud capabilities."
"Siebel CRM should improve its UI. Because it's all about the customer experience and how the customer experiences it, the internal customer is more important for CRM than the people handling the company. So, you get frustrated if you don't have a very good user interface and user experience."
"Currently, Siebel CRM is not helping the agent provide faster feedback to the customer."
"The tool took a lot of time to deploy."
"The documentation needs to be improved."
"It is difficult to set up."
"I want Oracle to improve the tool’s UI with a vanilla application. I would also like to see an insurance broking vertical in their future releases. There are thousands of brokers who look for an insurance broking solution."
"Certain functions have occasional performance issues."
"The reporting for developers should be improved."
"I would like to see better integration with Zoho Creator."
"The only thing I noticed was that it does not support multi-country operations. In Canada, for example, we do not use the term "state," but rather "province," and we do not use zip codes, but rather "postal codes.""
"I have issues with the tool's scalability."
"Zoho CRM has a rule engine or a place where you can set certain rules. That's not evolved very much. They could improve this within the platform."
"There are at least two big pieces. One is just the ability to reorganize the data and clean it up to eliminate duplicates and things like that. It is very manual at the moment. It only gives us certain fields that we can check on. Because of our particular database, it creates a problem. We deal with hospitals, and there are 50 hospitals. It is tough to figure out which one is which. Is it this one or the other one? So, trying to clean things up is very difficult. I'd like to have more ability to share data fields. The data is structured into different buckets, and I frequently have to create the same field in two different buckets. It would be nice if I could just do a view-only field in another bucket. In my contact bucket, I would like to be able to have just a view-only of the account information so that I don't need to enter it again, which is what I have to do currently."
"What needs improvement in Zoho CRM is the UI. It needs to be more user-friendly. I like Salesforce better than Zoho CRM in terms of the UI, so if Zoho CRM can make some UI changes, that would make the tool better."
Siebel CRM is ranked 5th in CRM with 16 reviews while Zoho CRM is ranked 6th in CRM with 47 reviews. Siebel CRM is rated 7.8, while Zoho CRM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Siebel CRM writes "Comes with complaint management feature but improvement is needed in UI ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zoho CRM writes "A highly stable solution that allows customization and data sharing". Siebel CRM is most compared with Microsoft Dynamics CRM, SAP CRM, Oracle CRM, Oracle CX Sales and Vlocity, whereas Zoho CRM is most compared with SAP CRM, monday.com, Bitrix24, Microsoft Dynamics CRM and Salesforce Sales Cloud. See our Siebel CRM vs. Zoho CRM report.
See our list of best CRM vendors.
We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
