ScreenConnect vs Transmit Security comparison

ConnectWise and Transmit Security are both solutions in the Remote Access category. ConnectWise is ranked #18, while Transmit Security is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.3. ConnectWise holds a 3.1% mindshare in VUS, compared to Transmit Security’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of ConnectWise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Transmit Security users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

ScreenConnect and Transmit Security are products competing in the IT and security sectors. ScreenConnect holds the upper hand in affordability and support services, while Transmit Security excels with comprehensive security features providing more value for the price.

Features: ScreenConnect offers remote access and control capabilities that provide flexibility in managing systems. Its key features include remote support, unattended access, and session recording. Transmit Security focuses on secure identity management with advanced authentication methods, fraud prevention, and seamless platform integration. The significant difference is ScreenConnect's emphasis on remote connectivity versus Transmit Security's robust security infrastructure.

Room for Improvement: ScreenConnect could enhance its security measures to remain competitive with its rivals. Improved integration options and enhanced reporting features would be beneficial. A more intuitive user interface would also promote easier navigation. For Transmit Security, simplifying deployment processes would be advantageous. Enhancing customer support channels and optimizing pricing structures could also attract more users. Focusing on lower initial investment could increase accessibility for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScreenConnect provides a straightforward deployment model with quick setup and user-friendly operations. Customers appreciate its efficient support and quick response times. Transmit Security requires a more detailed configuration for maximum security, but offers comprehensive support during deployment and ongoing assistance. The difference is ScreenConnect's simplicity versus Transmit Security's security-centric, more complex setup.

Pricing and ROI: ScreenConnect offers a cost-effective solution with lower setup costs, providing good ROI for businesses focusing on remote management. Transmit Security has higher initial costs but offers significant long-term ROI by enhancing security and reducing data breach risks. The distinction lies in ScreenConnect's affordability versus Transmit Security's high-value investment in security.

To learn more, read our detailed ScreenConnect vs. Transmit Security Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ScreenConnect vs. Transmit Security

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Remote Access category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 7.1%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScreenConnect is 3.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Transmit Security is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Access Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Intune	7.1%
ScreenConnect	3.1%
Transmit Security	0.3%
Other	89.5%

Remote Access

Featured Reviews

Varun Mehra

collaboration support engineer at a retailer with 11-50 employees

Centralized device management has transformed security and streamlined remote provisioning

One area where Microsoft Intune can improve is the user interface. Sometimes the portal feels a bit complex and not very intuitive, especially for new users, and it can take time to find specific settings. Another point is troubleshooting. While logs are available, the diagnostic policies and sync issues can still be time-consuming and not very straightforward. I also feel that reporting could be more detailed and customizable. The built-in reports are helpful, but for deeper insights, I often need to rely on additional tools. Overall, it is a strong solution, but improving usability and troubleshooting experience would make it even better. While Microsoft Intune works very well within the Microsoft ecosystem, the integration of some third-party tools could be smoother and require less customization. Support is another area that could improve, as sometimes response times can be slow, and resolving complex issues may take longer than expected. In terms of features, I think more advanced automation and built-in remediation options would be helpful since common issues can be fixed automatically without manual intervention.

Read full review

Todd Blake

Senior IT Specialist at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees

Simple to set up, reasonable pricing, and useful remote control capabilities

I'm on the latest version of the solution. I just updated it yesterday. While we have the solution on-premises at this time, we'll likely move to the cloud later this year. They have a trial version that you can try. They have a free version that you can try as well. I use it myself to support my family. I would try the free version or the trial version depending on your business. They can set you up and you can get to see all the features. I would also advocate going to the cloud version. Don't bother with the on-prem. It's just easier to jump to the cloud. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer2804310

Lead Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Journey orchestration has improved fraud prevention but still needs shared rules and better usability

The main improvement needed is that with the tool, you have to build rules for each and every application. There is no common place where you can write the rules and use that rule for all your applications, which is missing. This is a big feature that is missing compared to the other products in the market. Additionally, the SDKs, Journey Player, and other components are not business-friendly, so you really have to be technical to get into it and do those things. A non-technical person would find it really hard to implement and learn things inside Transmit Security. Even though it requires less coding, you still have to have some technical people in your team to really write the rules and integrate those rules into your application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Intune's most valuable features are the device, compliance, and configuration policies."

"I like Intune's ability to manage roles, maintenance tasks, compliance settings, and patch development for all endpoints."

"The interface is user-friendly, and the reporting tool works in real-time."

"The ability to block and erase remote devices is valuable to us, especially when those devices are lost."

"We have not had any issues with the scalability."

"The aspects I find most valuable are managing the data and applications, restricting users from installing any applications, and being able to wipe the data if a phone is misplaced or stolen."

"Microsoft Intune is the best solution available; we can connect with any device and handle all queries, which sets it apart from other tools available in the market."

"Intune provides full visibility into all active mobile device users. If their devices are noncompliant with our security policies, I have the flexibility to update them remotely."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"I am able to support our remote users; this has been a great help."

"it gives me the ability to remotely connect to machines that I manage without user intervention."

"We are more efficient at resolving end-user tickets as a result of implementing this product, with our ticket count lower and our ticket throughput increased because now we just click a button to connect and we're off and running."

"Ease of use is good, it's very easy to use, very easy to understand."

"Compared to what's out there the pricing is probably a good value."

"If you are looking for a quick and easy web-based connection session without the need to be on intranet, then this is the solution for you."

"I am overall satisfied with the product."

"Being able to flip quickly between however many monitors that I have running, detune the video for black and white, or with fewer colors to make it faster, is amazing."

More ScreenConnect pros

"Transmit interface is flexible and user-friendly, which is important for our workload. Switching from one authentication code to multiple exposure or two-factor authentication (MFA) is seamless."

"Transmit Security has impacted my organization positively because it is reassuring to know that we are building on top of a trusted tool, and we do not rely on developers that could make mistakes, and because it is an authentication platform, that could be detrimental."

"Transmit Security has positively impacted my organization by improving the development of workflows in order to help the user experience."

"Transmit Security has played a major role for our organization, especially in the authentication areas."

Cons

"The interface is not as modern as some competitors in terms of single pane of glass visibility across the entire landscape. It has a very Azure vibe and may not be as graphically appealing as other products."

"Cost is the biggest factor for us right now. Microsoft Intune and AD P1 together in a bundle is a good thing to have, but it is very costly compared to other products in the market. Otherwise, Microsoft Intune is the best."

"One big problem with Microsoft is that they're changing the names of the products quite often, or they're quite consistently doing so. Intune is now Endpoint administration. Constantly switching the user interface or the administrative interface makes it quite hard to keep pace. If you are on a two-week holiday and you come back and look at the same screen you have looked at for the last couple of months, it looks different, which is annoying. Changing things around all the time doesn't make it easy."

"There is improvement needed in integrating with the installed Office solutions versions, such as Office 2019."

"We would like to see the ability to use multiple personas on a device, similar to Samsung Knox, included in future updates."

"Customer support is decent overall, but not perfect. Most issues get resolved but sometimes response time can be a bit slow or require multiple follow-ups."

"Better reporting capabilities, stronger Mac OS management, faster policy synchronization, and easier troubleshooting are needed."

"The solution could improve by having better integration with Apple."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"I really didn't care for the onboarding process and it is something that should be improved."

"Speed is a major factor in Automate, and the control panel is horribly slow."

"There could be improvement to the remote command line tools."

"Support for PAC files on the guest's side and support for proxy on the host's side. Currently, there is no support for guest-side PAC files or for the host-side proxy (which uses authentication)."

"The recent redesign has made it slower and basically worthless."

"My immediate supervisor said it was lacking in documentation and had too many words to describe how to use the product when crafting instructions to send to our third party consultant who was going to connect to our system behind our firewall."

"Setting up permissions and groups in the portal is NOT simple or intuitive by any stretch."

"I have not had to deal with their tech support very much. When I have, I was not thrilled with their support."

More ScreenConnect cons

"The main improvement needed is that with the tool, you have to build rules for each and every application."

"Pricing is an area where Transmit Security could improve. The pricing needs to be more competitive."

"The scalability of Transmit Security is a little bit tricky. It is not easy to scale and depends on the complexity of my workflows and how many users I am going to support."

"The customer support varies, but overall, we are satisfied."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Intune is cost-effective as it is included in some of the Office 365 packages."

"Microsoft's licensing is more flexible and adaptive than its competitors."

"We work in the charity sector, so a lot of our clients get Microsoft Premium licenses or Business Premium for free. They get ten licenses free, and a lot of our clients do not have more than ten staff members. They are getting the tool for free, so its cost is not an issue."

"As a partner, we always look for how we can generate more revenue from a consulting point of view, but I do not see any complaints from the customer side regarding pricing, so they are satisfied with it."

"Pricing can be improved."

"While Microsoft Intune boasts a wide range of features, its user-friendliness and bundled licensing cost are key considerations for me."

"Microsoft Intune is moderately priced. There is a monthly license required to use the solution and it is approximately eight dollars per month."

"Microsoft Intune is expensive."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"We pay an annual licensing fee."

"We pay $85 per month for each user for a ConnectWise package with multiple solutions."

"I think the product's pricing is a good value. I paid $600 a year and that was fine for me. It was about $50 a month. Licensing is all very straightforward."

"ConnectWise Control is not an overly expensive tool. Its pricing is reasonable."

"It is priced well and it is still a great value. Although I have been reading a lot about Splashtop. They are getting pretty competitive on their pricing, including a fairly easy to use remote support for mobile applications, like iOS and Android."

"Make sure you have enough licensing for all the techs that you have."

"It is priced fairly."

"We pay $3,000 USD for the service, yearly upfront."

More ScreenConnect pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Access solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

Marketing Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

30%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	157
Midsize Enterprise	59
Large Enterprise	181

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Transmit Security?

I have heard that pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Transmit Security are a little bit expensive, but I am not ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Transmit Security?

I think Transmit Security can be improved by creating features that would allow the replacing of other companies such...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Transmit Security?

My main use case for Transmit Security is access management and identity journey coordination. A specific example of ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 9% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 7% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

TeamViewer vs ScreenConnect

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs ScreenConnect

Compared 6% of the time

BeyondTrust Remote Support vs ScreenConnect

Compared 6% of the time

LogMeIn Rescue vs ScreenConnect

Compared 6% of the time

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs ScreenConnect

Compared 4% of the time

More ScreenConnect Competitors

Auth0 Platform vs Transmit Security

Compared 18% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Transmit Security

Compared 15% of the time

ForgeRock vs Transmit Security

Compared 9% of the time

Okta Platform vs Transmit Security

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Identity Manager vs Transmit Security

Compared 8% of the time

More Transmit Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

April 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

ScreenConnect

April 2026

Download ScreenConnect product report

Buyer's Guide

Transmit Security

April 2026

Download Transmit Security product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

ConnectWise Control

BindID, FlexID, WorkID

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

ScreenConnect enables seamless remote access to desktops and mobile devices with robust security features, minimizing customer downtime and safeguarding interactions.

ScreenConnect stands out with its customization options, allowing users to white-label their software and showcase brand identity in every support interaction. With AES-256 encryption and two-factor authentication, security is integral. The Support Premium edition includes ScreenConnect View, allowing real-time troubleshooting via mobile camera streams. Configurability and granular permissions ensure tailored access for team members, while unattended access and session persistence enhance usability and productivity. Integration capabilities and tool-sharing optimize efficiency, making it ideal for IT service providers.

What features make ScreenConnect unique?

Robust Remote Access: Facilitates seamless connectivity across devices.
Unattended Access: Allows remote management without user presence.
Customization: Offers white-labeling to match brand identity.
Session Persistence: Maintains connections across reboots.
File Transfers: Enables easy exchange of files during sessions.
Integration Capabilities: Enhances software functionality through third-party connections.
Session Groups and Triggers: Organizes sessions efficiently.

What benefits should users look for?

Stable Connectivity: Ensures consistent remote access.
Security: Features robust encryption and authentication measures.
Efficiency: Optimizes IT support processes and resource management.
Customization: Tailors the software to individual brand needs.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface for straightforward operation.
Scalability: Adapts to the growing demands of organization.

Organizations use ScreenConnect for remote support, providing IT teams with a tool to assist clients efficiently from anywhere. Managed service providers leverage features like unattended access to troubleshoot and manage IT issues across multiple devices. ScreenConnect's adaptability makes it suitable for companies with remote employees, ensuring seamless support and connectivity.

ConnectWise

Transmit Security's cloud-based platform provides comprehensive Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) services, streamlining identity and access solutions with innovative functionalities.

Transmit Security delivers a robust suite of CIAM services, focusing on identity orchestration for automated access control, detection and response for risk management, and identity management with features like single sign-on and verifications. Offering authentication services including multi-factor options, the platform ensures data validation, enhancing accuracy and fraud prevention with minimal technical complexity through its low-code approach.

What are the key features of Transmit Security?

FlexID: Tailored user experiences for identity management.
Multi-factor Authentication: Offers secure, passwordless logins.
AuthScript: Simplified programming for application flows.
Graphic Interface: Facilitates workflow development and customization.
Journey Orchestration: Enhances user interaction and fraud prevention with low-code solutions.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Customization: Allows intricate configurations for specific needs.
Security: Protects high-risk transactions and data accuracy.
User Experience: Simplified application workflows enhance interactions.
Technical Efficiency: Backend journey coordination reduces recompilation needs.

Transmit Security is widely implemented for seamless user application and access management across industries needing secure and efficient identity coordination. In sectors like finance, it helps manage customer identities and protect high-risk transactions such as bank transfers, leveraging technologies like biometrics and RESTful API integrations, although pricing and technical complexity can be challenging for some enterprises.

Transmit Security

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Jon Rosen Systems

Mitgate, Telepass, Metro Bank, Santander

Buyer's Guide

ScreenConnect vs. Transmit Security

April 2026

Free Report: ScreenConnect vs. Transmit Security

Find out what your peers are saying about ScreenConnect vs. Transmit Security and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ScreenConnect vs. Transmit Security report.

See our list of best Remote Access vendors.

We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.