Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

RSA Archer vs SecurityScorecard comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
RSA Archer streamlines operations by automating processes, centralizing data, and enhancing risk management for high ROI and cost savings.
Sentiment score
6.2
SecurityScorecard helps organizations identify and mitigate risks, enhancing decision-making and proactive security against digital threats and breaches.
It relates to the effectiveness of employees and the time taken to complete tasks manually versus using the RSA system.
The biggest benefit is visibility, allowing organizations to understand their risks, vulnerabilities, and potential threats.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.3
Users experience varied satisfaction with RSA Archer support, appreciating prompt assistance but sometimes requiring escalation for complex issues.
Sentiment score
5.8
SecurityScorecard's customer support is knowledgeable but slow, with resolution times of 1-3 days and satisfaction rates averaging 7/10.
The response time from RSA Archer's support team is not an issue; usually, there's no problem getting a timely response, but there could be more knowledgeable agents available.
They are responsive and perform well in technical support.
They need better organization to support their customer volume.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
RSA Archer offers scalable solutions for multiple organizations, though effectiveness varies with strategy, deployment, and resource management.
Sentiment score
7.0
SecurityScorecard is scalable for medium to large businesses but may not suit Fortune 500 due to scale issues.
Scalability depends on the number of servers, including web and service servers.
The level of scalability depends on customization and how skillful our customization team is.
The product is suitable for medium to large businesses, typically with a revenue range from $200 million to a couple of billion dollars.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.1
RSA Archer is stable and improved, though performance varies with resources and user load, rating around seven to eight.
Sentiment score
7.8
SecurityScorecard is highly stable with a 99.99% rating; users report no issues, except minor MS Edge adjustments.
Performance issues arise mainly since it is not a core service for most organizations, so the resources provided are fewer.
The tool has stability, and it allows me to automate whatever process I have.
 

Room For Improvement

RSA Archer struggles with outdated interface, complex workflows, costly updates, and lacks intuitive design and efficient integrations.
Users seek improved support, better pricing, faster responses, mobile app scanning, and enhanced risk management features.
A remaining area for improvement is integration. There should be built-in integration mechanisms, for example, for organizations switching from platforms like ServiceNow to Archer, instead of custom integrations for each client.
While the AI features are emerging and the cost is comparatively low, it's not yet up to the market standard.
It would be helpful if RSA Archer had the capability for two-way integration because, in any information technology area, having the ability to provide feedback is beneficial.
There is a need for more active rather than passive third-party risk management features to truly mitigate risks.
 

Setup Cost

RSA Archer is costly but valued for flexibility and functionality, appealing more to large enterprises than smaller ones.
SecurityScorecard pricing starts at $400/month, appealing for flexibility, though international users face extra currency fees.
after comparing it with other products in the market, I would rate it around six or seven out of ten, as the price is relative.
There are more expensive and cheaper options available.
 

Valuable Features

RSA Archer enhances governance, risk, and compliance with configurable modules, automation, robust security, and strong reporting, appealing to users.
SecurityScorecard enhances security with easy reporting, vendor analysis, threat monitoring, and risk assessments using threat intelligence and breach insights.
In the banking sector, Archer has been used to automate processes such as business continuity management, transitioning from manual processes to automated systems.
The tool has stability, and it allows me to automate whatever process I have.
This allows us to show end users and management where the issues lie and effectively demonstrate accountability and visibility in compliance.
It combines threat intel data with vulnerability information to increase risk ratings and provides insights into third-party supply chain risks.
 

Categories and Ranking

RSA Archer
Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
GRC (1st), IT Governance (1st)
SecurityScorecard
Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the IT Vendor Risk Management category, the mindshare of RSA Archer is 12.3%, up from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SecurityScorecard is 10.9%, up from 10.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Vendor Risk Management
 

Featured Reviews

IMRAN ALMARZOOQI - PeerSpot reviewer
Automates compliance management effectively but needs improved interface and dashboards
The tool basically automates whatever processes you already have, so I cannot specify improvements in that regard. However, my main issue with Archer is the graphics. The graphics have always been lacking. I always need to depend on another tool to read information from Archer to have better dashboards. It is like using Linux, and it has a Linux mindset and interface. I want to use Archer for top management and CEOs, but it looks too technical, and the dashboards are not really friendly. They are bulky, like opening an old Nintendo system from nineteen-ninety. The management agrees that Archer lacks in terms of presentation and dashboarding. It is complex, not user-friendly, and bulky. The interface just looks old.
Hadar Eshel - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services
Our organization relies on numerous SaaS services for critical business functions, such as CRM and monitoring solutions. In a hypothetical scenario where a security breach occurs in the CRM database, potentially exposing our data and our clients, SecurityScorecard proves invaluable. It provides a security score, typically a percentage, based on extensive data collection from various sources, including the dark web and social networks. Let's say our CRM solution receives a security score of 78%, indicating a relatively safe status according to the information gathered by SecurityScorecard. One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements. Additionally, it provides valuable insights into vulnerabilities within an organization, utilizing tools such as CVE details. For instance, it can assign a score based on vulnerabilities detected, such as 60%, and specify each vulnerability by its identifier. It offers scalability and can handle large volumes of real-time data. The continuous monitoring feature significantly enhances the ability to manage risks by providing real-time data collection on suppliers. We can observe fluctuations in their security levels over time, sometimes even every month. We can create alerts for high-risk situations, enabling organizations to respond promptly to potential security threats or vulnerabilities identified within their supplier network. The product's security ratings are helpful. While there may be occasional false positives, it does not function as a scanning solution. Instead, it presents the same information that hackers could potentially exploit. While I haven't worked with other cybersecurity rating solutions, I can attest to its strengths based on my experience. One notable advantage is their extensive data collection capabilities, surpassing many competitors in the market. They gather a wide range of information, resulting in a vast database that includes many suppliers or companies. It is easy to integrate with other tools. I rate it a nine out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.
864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Insurance Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about RSA Archer?
It has various valuable features. For example, showing us if a control aligns with specific standards or frameworks helps us understand it better and verify its compliance.
What needs improvement with RSA Archer?
If the user needs to fill data, they need to go to one page and then to the next page if they can reduce the number of clicks to perform some activities and would like RSA to improve in this area. ...
What is your primary use case for RSA Archer?
I perform all of our information security management governance and risk -related activities through Archer. My organization manages all types of audits and Enterprise risk activities using Archer.
What do you like most about SecurityScorecard?
One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SecurityScorecard?
SecurityScorecard is priced in the middle range. There are more expensive and cheaper options available, however, Fortify Data and Censinet are also in the same middle range.
What needs improvement with SecurityScorecard?
The product can be improved by incorporating more data points and intelligence around dark web information and threat data. Adding more features to combine and consolidate internal vulnerability sc...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Archer
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

T-Systems, Bridge Point, Equifax, First Data, Global Imaging Company, Manulife Financial
TriNet, USAA, Zurich, Gilt Groupe, McGraw Hill Financial
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA Archer vs. SecurityScorecard and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.