We performed a comparison between Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and SecurityScorecard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Vendor Risk Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I prefer BitSight due to its patch management capabilities. The score is a valuable feature. I have contacted the customer support through e-mail and their response rate is fast. I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"Offers open ports from an external point of view."
"The product helps us identify the vulnerabilities of internet-facing applications."
"Its customer service team responds quickly."
"I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process."
"The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities."
"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."
"With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."
"The solution’s benchmarking should be improved."
"Data enrichment is the major issue."
"Its factor analysis feature could be better."
"At the moment, when the vulnerability score decreases, it remains the same for quite a while, even though issues are resolved in 24 hours."
"There may be room for improvement in the methodology for identifying findings, as occasional errors occur on the technical side."
"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."
"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."
"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."
"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."
More Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management is ranked 2nd in IT Vendor Risk Management with 5 reviews while SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews. Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management is rated 8.6, while SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management writes "User-friendly solution with robust patch management capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management is most compared with RiskRecon, Microsoft Secure Score, UpGuard Vendor Risk, Tenable Lumin and OneTrust GRC, whereas SecurityScorecard is most compared with Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Qualys VMDR. See our Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management vs. SecurityScorecard report.
See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
