Red Hat AMQ vs Redis comparison

Red Hat and RedisLabs are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Additionally, 90% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of RedisLabs users who would recommend it.

Red Hat AMQ

Read 9 Red Hat AMQ reviews

2,204 Views
1,578 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Redis

Read 22 Redis reviews

1,261 Views
1,141 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat AMQ

Redis

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Red Hat AMQ and Redis based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Red Hat AMQ vs. Redis Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat AMQ vs. Redis

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Red Hat AMQ

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (7th)

Redis

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

NoSQL Databases (7th), In-Memory Data Store Services (1st), Vector Databases (4th)

Featured Reviews

Sther Martins

Java Developer at SCCON

An easy-to-learn solution that can be used with microservices

We have done around 20 projects in Red Hat AMQ. I have two projects using Red Hat AMQ, and I can share how its scalability has impacted them. In one project, we have a solution for authentication and authorization using SSO. We need to integrate with other systems in two ways. We use Red Hat AMQ for social data, sending messages to other queues, and integrating with business. We have two databases with the same information. The solution is good because it helps us solve problems with messaging. For instance, when messaging doesn't change, we still check the cloud and verify the information. In another project, we have a large banking solution for the Amazon region using Red Hat AMQ for financial transactions. In this solution, business messages are sent, and another system processes them.

Read full review

Yaseer Arafat

.Net Developer at Freelance

Unmatched Performance and Scalability for Modern Applications

Redis has room for improvement in a few areas. Enhanced tools for managing and monitoring clusters would be beneficial, as would built-in security mechanisms like advanced encryption and granular access controls. Simplifying setup and configuration could make Redis more accessible to new users. Introducing more enterprise-grade features, such as better multi-tenancy support and improved backup and restore capabilities, would also be advantageous. For the next release, it would be great to see enhanced cluster management tools, native multi-region supports for better data redundancy, integrated analytics for deeper insights, AI and ML integration features, and improved developer experience through enhanced SDKs and tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is stability."

"My impression is that it is average in terms of scalability."

"This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature."

"The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day."

"Reliability is the main criterion for selecting this tool for one of the busiest airports in Mumbai."

"Red Hat AMQ's best feature is its reliability."

"The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched."

"I can organize the tool with microservices, which allows me to use it across different services. It is easy to learn."

More Red Hat AMQ pros

"The solution is fast, provides good performance, and is not too expensive."

"Redis acts as an in-memory search tool that improves the speed of operations."

"Redis is a simple service that does what it promises."

"Redis is good for distributed caching management."

"It is particularly efficient for cloud-based storage and operations."

"The best thing about Redis is its ability to handle large amounts of data without frequently hitting the database. You can store data in temporary memory, especially for high-volume data."

"The ability to fetch and save data quickly is valuable."

"Redis has multiple valuable features such as being a free and reliable open-source tool."

More Redis pros

Cons

"This product needs better visualization capabilities in general."

"There are several areas in this solution that need improvement, including clustering multi-nodes and message ordering."

"Red Hat AMQ's cost could be improved, and it could have better integration."

"The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow."

"AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools."

"The challenge is the multiple components it has. This brings a higher complexity compared to IBM MQ, which is a single complete unit."

"The product needs to improve its documentation and training."

"There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly."

More Red Hat AMQ cons

"I would prefer it if there was more information available about Redis. That would make it easier for new beginners. Currently, there is a lack of resources."

"Redis presents a single point of failure and lacks fault tolerance."

"The development of clusters could improve. Additionally, it would be helpful if it was integrated with Amazon AWS or Google Cloud."

"There is a lack of documentation on the scalability of the solution."

"The initial setup of Redis was difficult, with a rating of two or three out of ten."

"Redis could be improved by introducing a GUI to display key-value pair database information, as it is currently a CLI tool with no visual representation."

"The solution's pricing for a local installation is very expensive."

"The only thing is the lack of a GUI application. There was a time when we needed to resolve an issue in production. If we had a GUI, it would have been easier."

More Redis cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a subscription needed for this solution and there are support plans available."

"Red Hat AMQ's pricing could be improved."

"This is a very cost-effective solution and the pricing is much better than competitors."

"The solution is open-source."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"We saw an ROI. It made the processing of our transactions faster."

"Redis is an open-source product."

"The tool is open-source. There are no additional costs."

"Redis is not an overpriced solution."

"Redis is an open-source solution. There are not any hidden fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Red Hat AMQ?

AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat AMQ?

The product needs to improve its documentation and training.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat AMQ?

We just started working with Red Hat AMQ. We selected it as the ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) platform for a new airport project. I manage the entire Master System Integration (MSI) project for one ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Redis?

Redis is better tested and is used by large companies. I haven't found a direct alternative to what Redis offers. Plus, there are a lot of support and learning resources available, which help you u...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Redis?

There are a few areas where Redis could improve. The pub-sub capabilities could be optimized to handle network sessions better, as there are challenges with maintaining sessions between clients and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Redis?

We use Redis ( /products/redis-reviews ) for several purposes, including ranking, counting, saving, sharing, caching, and setting time-to-live notifications. These functionalities are employed acro...

See all answers

Comparisons

ActiveMQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 36% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 27% of the time

IBM MQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 22% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Event Streams vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 5% of the time

More Red Hat AMQ Competitors

Chroma vs Redis

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle Coherence vs Redis

Compared 11% of the time

Red Hat Data Grid vs Redis

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon SQS vs Redis

Compared 8% of the time

Faiss vs Redis

Compared 5% of the time

More Redis Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat AMQ

April 2025

Download Red Hat AMQ product report

Buyer's Guide

Redis

April 2025

Download Redis product report

Also Known As

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ, Red Hat JBoss AMQ

Redis Enterprise

Overview

To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

Red Hat

Redis is a high-performance, scalable, and easy-to-use caching solution that improves application performance. It is also used for session management, real-time analytics, and as a message broker.

Redis's valuable features include its ability to handle large amounts of data quickly, its simplicity and straightforward setup process, and its support for various data structures, providing flexibility for different use cases.

RedisLabs

Sample Customers

E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings

1. Twitter 2. GitHub 3. StackOverflow 4. Pinterest 5. Snapchat 6. Craigslist 7. Digg 8. Weibo 9. Airbnb 10. Uber 11. Slack 12. Trello 13. Shopify 14. Coursera 15. Medium 16. Twitch 17. Foursquare 18. Meetup 19. Kickstarter 20. Docker 21. Heroku 22. Bitbucket 23. Groupon 24. Flipboard 25. SoundCloud 26. BuzzFeed 27. Disqus 28. The New York Times 29. Walmart 30. Nike 31. Sony 32. Philips

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat AMQ vs. Redis

April 2025

Free Report: Red Hat AMQ vs. Redis

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat AMQ vs. Redis and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Red Hat AMQ vs. Redis report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.