Red Hat AMQ vs Redis comparison

Read 26 Redis reviews

7,107 Views
1,279 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat AMQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Red Hat AMQ and Redis based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Red Hat AMQ vs. Redis Report (Updated: April 2026).

Red Hat AMQ vs. Redis

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Red Hat AMQ

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (7th)

Redis

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

NoSQL Databases (4th), Managed NoSQL Databases (6th), In-Memory Data Store Services (1st), Vector Databases (4th), AI Software Development (13th)

Featured Reviews

SachinJain

Senior Technical Specialist at Intuitive Technology Partners

Efficiently manages high availability and fault tolerance for critical systems with user-friendly management features

I have experience with features such as message persistence and fault tolerance because I configured high availability and fault tolerance for the client environment, including active-active and active-passive configurations. I mainly prefer active-active. I created a security feature for user authentication and authorization in Red Hat AMQ using vault. When you enable the vault, then your whole Red Hat AMQ becomes more secure. Management is straightforward. I configured it and created documentation. The operations team takes care of the operation part. I educate them on how to manage access, so they can easily add new people who join the company or manage the people who leave. The benefits of using Red Hat AMQ include easy configuration and monitoring. On the portal, I can monitor how many packets or alerts have been generated or sent to the end user via Red Hat AMQ along with messages or emails. It also shows utilization in the tool. These features also come with other AMQs such as Amazon and IBM.

Read full review

Varuns Ug

Senior Software Developer at NIT

Caching has accelerated complex workflows and delivers low latency for high-traffic microservices

A few features of Redis that I use on a day-to-day basis and feel are among the best are extremely low latency and high throughput. Since Redis is in-memory, it makes it ideal for cases such as caching and rate limiting where response time is critical. TTL expiry support is very useful in Redis as it allows me to automatically evict stale data without manual cleanup, which is something I use heavily in my caching strategy. Another point I can mention is that the rich data structures such as strings, hashes, and even sorted sets are very powerful. I have used strings for caching responses and counters, whereas I have used hashes for storing structured objects. One more feature I can tell you about is atomic operations. Redis guarantees atomicity for operations such as incrementing a counter, which is very useful for rate limiting and avoiding race conditions in distributed systems. Finally, I want to emphasize that Redis is easy to scale and integrate, whether through clustering or using a distributed cache across microservices. Redis has impacted my organization positively by providing default support that is very useful. For metrics, in one of my core systems, introducing Redis as a distributed cache helped me achieve around an 80% cache hit rate, which reduced repeated downstream services. Real API latency also improved from around two seconds to approximately 450 milliseconds for P99. It also helped reduce the load on dependent services and databases, which improved overall system reliability.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature."

"The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched."

"The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day."

"From the functionality perspective, 3scale provides a very comparable, if not the same feature set as any leader in the market for API management and the gateway perspective, but with a fraction of the price."

"AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination."

"The self-service aspect is very important for us, and AMQ Streams has enabled us to deliver new services faster, going from days to hours."

"My impression is that it is average in terms of scalability."

"Reliability is the main criterion for selecting this tool for one of the busiest airports in Mumbai."

More Red Hat AMQ pros

"Redis is a simple service that does what it promises."

"I use Redis mostly to cache repeated data that is required."

"Redis acts as an in-memory search tool that improves the speed of operations."

"Redis has multiple valuable features such as being a free and reliable open-source tool."

"The performance of Redis is very fast."

"Redis is a powerful and reliable tool for improving application performance."

"The ability to fetch and save data quickly is valuable."

"It makes operations more efficient. The information processing is very fast, and very responsive. It's all about the technology."

More Redis pros

Cons

"The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow."

"Red Hat AMQ's cost could be improved, and it could have better integration."

"The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow."

"There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated."

"This solution is completely unstable. We lose messages."

"This product needs better visualization capabilities in general."

"There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on."

"The challenge is the multiple components it has. This brings a higher complexity compared to IBM MQ, which is a single complete unit."

More Red Hat AMQ cons

"There is a lack of documentation on the scalability of the solution."

"For the PubSub feature, we had to create our own tools to monitor the events."

"Redis could improve its efficiency in handling locally stored data, not just Amazon Cloud or Google Cloud."

"Redis could be improved by introducing a GUI to display key-value pair database information, as it is currently a CLI tool with no visual representation."

"There are some features from MongoDB that I would like to see included in Redis to enhance its overall efficiency, such as the ability to perform remote behaviour. MongoDB is more efficient in handling updates than deletions and is quicker in processing updates, but it can be slower regarding deletions. This can sometimes pose a challenge, especially when dealing with large datasets or frequent data manipulations that involve deletions. In such cases, I often rewrite columns or update values instead of directly deleting data, as it can be more efficient."

"The initial setup of Redis was difficult, with a rating of two or three out of ten."

"There are some points where I feel Redis can be improved."

"The solution's pricing for a local installation is very expensive."

More Redis cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a subscription needed for this solution and there are support plans available."

"This is a very cost-effective solution and the pricing is much better than competitors."

"Red Hat AMQ's pricing could be improved."

"The solution is open-source."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"Redis is an open-source solution. There are not any hidden fees."

"Redis is an open-source product."

"The tool is open-source. There are no additional costs."

"Redis is not an overpriced solution."

"We saw an ROI. It made the processing of our transactions faster."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Red Hat AMQ?

The areas for improvement include cost, which is a primary concern. The deployment process is simple, but the cost is very important. Additionally, the management portal should be more user-friendl...

What is your primary use case for Red Hat AMQ?

For use cases for Red Hat AMQ, let's take banking purposes. This depends upon the firm or the service or product company. For example, let's take HDFC Bank or any other bank. Whenever a customer de...

What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat AMQ?

I work primarily with Red Hat. For IBM, I have worked with their channel partner, not directly with IBM. For Amazon, I work with partners only. I am working with one company as a consultant. I also...

What do you like most about Redis?

Redis is better tested and is used by large companies. I haven't found a direct alternative to what Redis offers. Plus, there are a lot of support and learning resources available, which help you u...

What needs improvement with Redis?

Overall, Redis is a powerful and reliable tool, but there are a few areas for improvement. One limitation is that Redis is memory-based, so scaling can become expensive compared to disk-based syste...

What is your primary use case for Redis?

My main use case for Redis is caching frequently accessed data to improve performance and reduce database load. For example, I cache API responses and user-related data so that repeated requests ca...

Apache Kafka vs Red Hat AMQ

Comparisons

Compared 24% of the time

ActiveMQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 20% of the time

IBM MQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 17% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Event Streams vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 9% of the time

More Red Hat AMQ Competitors

Upstash vs Redis

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Coherence vs Redis

Compared 5% of the time

Hazelcast Platform vs Redis

Compared 5% of the time

Red Hat Data Grid vs Redis

Compared 5% of the time

Azure Cache for Redis vs Redis

Compared 4% of the time

More Redis Competitors

Product Reports

Red Hat AMQ

Download Red Hat AMQ product report

Download Redis product report

Also Known As

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ, Red Hat JBoss AMQ

Redis Enterprise

Overview

Red Hat AMQ provides robust performance with high scalability and security, supporting efficient message processing and various protocols. It integrates with OpenShift and Apache Kafka, making it ideal for event-driven microservices in hybrid environments.

Red Hat AMQ is designed for asynchronous messaging, data synchronization, and real-time notifications. Its strengths include high availability, fault tolerance, and operator-based automation. The lightweight, scalable design enables straightforward management, combined with reliable official support. Integration with ActiveMQ ensures stable and independent installation. Users can also employ connectors and routing on Kubernetes, enhancing its utility for sectors like banking and logistics.

What are the most valuable features of Red Hat AMQ?

Compatibility with OpenShift, facilitating seamless integration
Operator-based automation for streamlined processes
High availability and fault tolerance for continuous operations
Vault-based security ensuring data protection
Scalability and lightweight design for efficient resource use
Support for multiple protocols enhancing flexibility

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Red Hat AMQ?

Scalability for growing business demands
Ease of configuration reducing setup time
Robust performance delivering reliable message processing
Cost advantages offering economic benefits over competitors
Stability from independent installation ensuring resilience

Industries use Red Hat AMQ for asynchronous application messaging, enhancing communication in Master System Integration projects. Sectors like banking utilize it for real-time alerts, while logistics companies leverage it for notifications. Its support for connectors and routing within OpenShift benefits organizations with complex data flow requirements.

Red Hat

Redis offers high-speed, in-memory storage, renowned for real-time performance. It supports quick data retrieval and is used commonly in applications like analytics and gaming.

Renowned for real-time performance, Redis delivers high-speed in-memory storage, making it a favorite for applications needing quick data retrieval. Its diverse data structures and caching capabilities support a broad array of use cases, including analytics and gaming. Redis ensures robust scalability with master-slave replication and clustering, while its publish/subscribe pattern renders it reliable for event-driven applications. The solution integrates smoothly with existing systems, minimizing performance tuning needs. Although documentation on scalability and security could be improved, Redis remains cost-effective and stable, commonly utilized in cloud environments. Enhancing integration with cloud services like AWS and Google Cloud and refining GUI may improve usability.

What are the key features of Redis?

High Speed: In-memory data storage for swift access.
Scalability: Master-slave replication and clustering for growth.
Data Structures: Supports diverse types for varied uses.
Persistence: RDB snapshots and AOF logs ensure durability.
Integration: Seamless integration reduces tuning efforts.

What should users look for in Redis reviews?

Performance: Real-time data retrieval boosts efficiency.
Cost-Effectiveness: Stable, budget-friendly implementation.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse environments and platforms.
Reliability: Ensures data persistence and high availability.

Redis finds application across industries for tasks like caching to improve application performance and speed, minimizing database load. It enables real-time processing for session storage, push notifications, and analytics. As a messaging platform, Redis handles high traffic and supports replication and clustering for cross-platform scalability.

Sample Customers

E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings

1. Twitter 2. GitHub 3. StackOverflow 4. Pinterest 5. Snapchat 6. Craigslist 7. Digg 8. Weibo 9. Airbnb 10. Uber 11. Slack 12. Trello 13. Shopify 14. Coursera 15. Medium 16. Twitch 17. Foursquare 18. Meetup 19. Kickstarter 20. Docker 21. Heroku 22. Bitbucket 23. Groupon 24. Flipboard 25. SoundCloud 26. BuzzFeed 27. Disqus 28. The New York Times 29. Walmart 30. Nike 31. Sony 32. Philips

Red Hat AMQ vs. Redis