Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ReadyAPI Test vs Testim comparison

SmartBear and Testim are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.3, while Testim is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.6. SmartBear holds a 0.7% mindshare in FT, compared to Testim’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Testim users who would recommend it.
ReadyAPI Test
Read 31 ReadyAPI Test reviews
  • 1,619 Views
  • 324 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
Testim
Read 10 Testim reviews
  • 2,938 Views
  • 1,498 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

ReadyAPI Test and Testim are competing products in the software testing space. Based on comparisons, Testim stands out for its advanced feature set, whereas ReadyAPI Test receives accolades for its pricing and support.

Features: ReadyAPI Test offers extensive API testing, including security and performance capabilities, and integrates well with DevOps tools. Testim shines with AI-driven test creation, powerful automation, and adaptability to various testing requirements. The primary distinction is Testim's innovative technology opposed to ReadyAPI's concentration on API testing essentials.

Room for Improvement: ReadyAPI Test could enhance its user interface for greater accessibility and streamline its scripting capabilities. Additionally, improving integration support for more platforms could be beneficial. Testim should address its complex learning curve and provide more in-depth documentation. Simplifying manual configurations would also be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ReadyAPI Test is known for its straightforward deployment and efficient customer service. Testim's advanced AI features require technical proficiency for deployment, presenting a learning curve, but its customer service is praised for being responsive and supportive. The main difference is ReadyAPI's user-friendliness compared to Testim's complex deployment.

Pricing and ROI: ReadyAPI Test is often commended for its competitive pricing, offering good ROI with its comprehensive feature set at reasonable rates. Although Testim incurs a higher initial cost, its ROI is considered worthwhile due to its advanced automation features. The key contrast lies in ReadyAPI's affordability and Testim's value-driven investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ReadyAPI Test vs. Testim Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ReadyAPI Test vs. Testim
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ReadyAPI Test
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
21st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Regression Testing Tools (9th), API Testing Tools (9th)
Testim
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
11th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of ReadyAPI Test is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 3.4%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Luis Sanchez - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps in data, regression, performance, security, and functional testing
ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution.
Read full review
Dheeraj Bavirisetty - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancing automation skills, intuitive, and low-code
We use Testim to automate our testing scripts. I am part of the testing team for a corporate bank in the US, which is my client. We work on building their product, and Testim is used to automate the scripts since it is a low-code automation platform The feature I like most about Testim is the…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution offers excellent integration capabilities."
"Using SoapUI's automation suites to run all our test cases saved us a lot of time. Running 300 test cases takes about three to four days. When you automate all that, it takes only two to three hours."
"API mockups, functional testing, and load testing are valuable features."
"One good feature is SoapUI's URL check, which allows you to check among the applications. I'm not just talking about the ones for Android. It has all kinds of multi-world tests that are really helpful."
"The utmost importance lies in the performance of the application."
"The interface is user-friendly."
"It's a very simple solution to use."
"We used to write our own solutions, from small scripts to task web services, so this saves us thousands of hours."
More ReadyAPI Test pros
"The product is easy to use."
"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."
"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."
"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers."
"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."
"The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios."
"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."
"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."
More Testim pros
 

Cons

"The UI could be a bit more flexible."
"Stability has been an issue for us. It needs to be looked at and made a bit better."
"It is limited to scope and risk services only. It does have some support for JMS, but it is not out-of-the-box; you have to do some tweaks here and there."
"Occasionally, when you are saving, the solution can hang."
"SoapUI Pro is a little heavy due to the number of features. Previously it was not that heavy. Now the tool is too heavy, they should work on fixing this issue because until your system has lots of resources, you won't be able to use it seamlessly. The performance of the application itself could improve."
"The current interface is unsatisfactory."
"ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution."
"Could integrate the graphing module for load testing."
More ReadyAPI Test cons
"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."
"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."
"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."
"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."
"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."
"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."
"There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now."
"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."
More Testim cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten."
"It is free of charge."
"My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."
"The cost is not that bad."
"The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees."
"I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."
"ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."
"SoapUI Pro is open source but it has a subscription-based model which involves some more features. At the moment we are using the free version. The Pro version requires a license, and it is an annual license to use it."
More ReadyAPI Test pricing and cost advice
"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."
"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."
"The solution is not expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Insurance Company
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Educational Organization
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SoapUI Pro?
The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SoapUI Pro?
ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SoapUI Pro?
ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would b...
See all answers
What do you like most about Testim?
The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?
I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Testim?
More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Postman Enterprise vs ReadyAPI Test Logo
Postman Enterprise vs ReadyAPI Test
Compared 57% of the time
ReadyAPI vs ReadyAPI Test Logo
ReadyAPI vs ReadyAPI Test
Compared 7% of the time
Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Test Logo
Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Test
Compared 6% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs ReadyAPI Test Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs ReadyAPI Test
Compared 6% of the time
Katalon Studio vs ReadyAPI Test Logo
Katalon Studio vs ReadyAPI Test
Compared 6% of the time
More ReadyAPI Test Competitors
Tricentis Tosca vs Testim Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Testim
Compared 42% of the time
Katalon Studio vs Testim Logo
Katalon Studio vs Testim
Compared 21% of the time
Functionize vs Testim Logo
Functionize vs Testim
Compared 15% of the time
Testsigma vs Testim Logo
Testsigma vs Testim
Compared 6% of the time
Applitools vs Testim Logo
Applitools vs Testim
Compared 4% of the time
More Testim Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ReadyAPI Test
August 2025
ReadyAPI Test reportDownload ReadyAPI Test product report
Buyer's Guide
Testim
July 2025
Testim reportDownload Testim product report
 

Also Known As

SoapUI NG Pro
No data available
 

Overview

For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.
SmartBear

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Testim
 

Sample Customers

Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler
Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality
Buyer's Guide
ReadyAPI Test vs. Testim
July 2025
Free Report: ReadyAPI Test vs. Testim
Find out what your peers are saying about ReadyAPI Test vs. Testim and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ReadyAPI Test vs. Testim report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.