No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Rapid7 Exposure Command vs Sweepatic EASM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Rapid7 Exposure Command
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
22nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (18th)
Sweepatic EASM
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
44th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of Rapid7 Exposure Command is 1.9%. The mindshare of Sweepatic EASM is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Attack Surface Management (ASM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Rapid7 Exposure Command1.9%
Sweepatic EASM0.7%
Other97.4%
Attack Surface Management (ASM)
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Qualys, TrendAI and others in Attack Surface Management (ASM). Updated: March 2026.
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Qualys, TrendAI and others in Attack Surface Management (ASM). Updated: March 2026.
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.